Plot twist...

All of the excon hater accounts are actually alts of excon trying to get attention

Lol. I had a feeling someone was going to ask this question.

Hey, you said it.

Anyone who spams this site with topics about ex con's Jewishness is a loser.

Who cares? It's 2018. I identify as a trigendered Guava fruit. Science proves it or something

The only people who care are losers.

I agree with you that you can't know truths until you discover them.

I'm not sure you really understand what I'm saying. This might be a semantic argument.

Well, you are asking for proof of the existence of The Truth which in itself is evidence that you believe in truth.

If you actually believe in truth, you by necessity believe in The Truth, because if The Truth doesn't exist, there can be no truth.

So really it looks to me like you are having a hard time admitting that you actually do believe The Truth exists.

If you were really trying to illuminate me, you wouldn't hesitate to explain yourself.

I don't have to know or understand The Truth to know it exists.

Neither do you.

If you were totally ignorant of the laws of mathematics, would that mean that these laws are not true?

If no one knew these laws, would that mean they are not true?

Truths are discovered, they don't pop into existence only when they are known. They existed beforehand.

Knowledge is not truth.

The Truth, as in the eternal reality.

To distinguish from a truth, which is true only in a time, place, circumstance, and not eternally.

I do not understand what you are saying, but I wouldn't go so far as to call it gibberish as there may be a meaning behind it that I do not grasp.

Are you willing to interpret these strange tungues for me?

And how do you interpret this saying?

----------------------

That certainly appears to be nonsense to me, but I know that things are not always how they seem.

There is a difference between saying "that is nonsense" and saying "that looks like nonsense to me".

You got it.

Knowledge is inherently subjective.

So there is a difference between a known truth and an unknown truth, but an unknown truth isn't untrue simply because it is not known.

The Truth itself is something that absolutely cannot be known, because it wouldn't be what it is if it was known. That said, we can at least know that it exists.

I don't know or care about Deepak Chopra, but if he is saying what I am saying, how does that make what I'm saying any less true?

You say my words are gibberish like someone who only knows English might call Korean gibberish.

It isn't that what I'm saying is gibberish to you, it is that you either don't understand or refuse to understand.

It's very simple

What you know to be The Truth is not the same thing as what The Truth is in actuality.

If you can't see that, there are children with more insight than you, and you should be ashamed of your haughtiness.

But I think more highly of you than that, and I believe that you are capable of believing The Truth with sincerity.

You are saying that the only truth is knowledge?

So what about the things that science has not yet discovered, are these things untrue?

If I said, "The sky is blue", a blind person could say, "that makes no sense"

If I said, "the number 5 comes after 4" a mathematical fool might say, "that makes no sense."

You saying I make no sense is not an argument. You are only saying that you can't make sense of what I am saying.

So what exactly are you having trouble comprehending? What do you find confusing about what I just said?

If the FBI is saying the DNC hack was an inside job, that only makes the Seth Rich case stronger.

I don't know, don't look at me.

All knowledge of truth is subjective, you are correct.

Yet.....

The Truth is not a subjective, nor is it knowledge.

Knowledge of The Truth =/= The Truth

Knowledge that The Truth exists Is supported by multiple facts.

The Truth itself does not need support, and in fact supports everything else, including facts.

The state of things as they actually exist.

The way things actually are =/= The way things actually are as we know it

What is in accordance with fact or reality is that we are all wrong and don't see things as they truly are.

To admit this is to admit sin.

God is That Which Truly Is.

The Truth is eternal always existing

A truth in contrast is contingent in relative things like circumstance and and perceptions. A truth was not always true and will not always be true, but is only true for a season.

If there is a truth though, it could only be so if The Truth was somewhere in it. Killing a truth doesn't kill The Truth.

It is nonsense to you because you can't make sense of it.

What is nonsense to you is not nonsense to me.

You do after all say I have my truth, and you have your truth.

If you deny The Truth, which is greater than your personal truth or my personal truth, it stands to reason that you lack good sense.

But of course, you wouldn't be so foolish as to deny truth greater than your truth? You are of course, a man of reason who doesn't hold the truth in arbitrariness, right?

If there is anything at all with eternal existence it is The Truth.

Nothing is impossible

Or

Nothing is impossible?

A truth can certainly be supported by multiple facts, I don't think we are in disagreement about that.