You haven't posted a single argument. Not one. Nada. Niente. I, on the other hand, have posted more than 20.

Perhaps this relates more so to immigrants...

You're embarrassing yourself by making an incorrect distinction b/w "immigrants" and "migrants". The former is specifically international, whereas the latter can be international, it has nothing to do with employment. The worse thing is the entire paragraph does not argue the point of culture and behavior.

.

What you're arguing is for Australia to continue accepting immigrants but filter them so that Australia only lets in the skilled people. The filtering process will drastically reduce the number of migrants coming into Australia. Which is the same as agreeing with me: that Australia should accept far fewer migrants.

My pet water bottle not carcinogenic, it really good, it blue and green and has white cap and everything.

show me the arguments that you think are "stupid" and "flawed".

Your argument is flawed from the definition of the word "migrant". Nowhere can I find in a definition the words "forced" or "unforced". It has nothing to do with being forced or not. A migrant is simply someone who has moved to another country. Convicts are migrants, refugees are migrants, asylum seekers are migrants.

Migrants are disruptive to the current stability and threatens to destroy the fabric of society existing in Australia today. They come in not knowing much about the Australian political systems, the current culture, so they can't really make an informed decision when it comes to voting, they behave in ways that may be normal in their home countries, but are unacceptable in Australia.

Not to mention they bring with them political problems from their home countries, so if they were at war with other groups in their home countries, they continue that war on Australian soil, etc... That, my friend, disrupts the current stability of the country.

.

On the education of the migrants: IT COSTS MONEY!

Money that we can use to better educate the people already in Australia, who ALREADY knows Australian cultures and systems.

You can't kill all the bees... if humans don't exist, species will still go extinct, it's natural to go extinct when your species can no longer adapt to changes in the environment.

Animals have rights? Rights can only be taken, they cannot be given. Just as gifts can only be given, never taken.

So you want to play god.

Saving every insect, every bird, every speck of life that is endangered by human activities? What a crazy idea. Truly. What makes you think we can?

Do wasps stop and say "wait a minute! we don't have to kill and eat bees, let's just feed on leaves instead"

Conservatives are boring... truly, I mean nothing really happens if conservatives get their way...

You can be like "let's do it this way!"

and they'd be like "nah... let's just stick to what always works...",

"but this other way works just as well if not better!",

"nah, it's too much work to change things...",

"but we might learn something new in the process!",

"nah, there's nothing new, it's all been done before...",

"C'mon! It'll be fun!",

"Nah.. it's cool... umm I mean it's ok, that's what I mean, I don't like fun anyways... you go ahead"

The fact that you're inconvincible is testament to your own stubbornness. There's nothing wrong with most of the logics and reasonings provided here.

I may have argued aff before in a different debate, but I'm arguing neg here :)

Yes kids! This is a rookie mistake and noone likes it ;)

I say let everyone who wants to develop nuclear weapons do it. This will bring the world back to a balance of power and long lasting peace.

War is human nature. We fight for an ideal all the time. Change does not come without great friction and resistence, but change is good.

May be you can make a mistake. You make mistakes right? Don't say no, because it'd be a lie.

People make mistakes. We all may feel the desire for someone else other than our partner, sometimes the situation won't allow us to act on that desire, other times it may just be perfect for action... that doesn't mean we don't love our partner, right?

Vegetarians can't eat cheese

No, you're talking about vegans. Vegans don't eat cheese. Vegetarians on the other hand are a little different as they do eat animal products other than meat.

Also soy can cause hypothyroidism.

So can pregnancy, radiation treatments to the neck area (if you needed to treat cancer), for the rest you can Google it. The major risk factors are if you're over 50 years old or female. Consuming soy never gave me no hypo-nuthin'.

The world could end. That's not an argument though :) .

................

Talk to the vegan monks who practice martial arts about endurance and strength... see if you can out do them in anything physical... endurance and strength is as much about training as it is about eating a balanced diet. This balanced diet can be vegan.

With the benefit of modern nutritional science, we've now discovered something we did not know thousands of years ago: We will be just as healthy (if not more) if we don't eat meats...

I don't quite understand why people argue healthier or not

Where have you been the last 10 years?

The argument of healthier or not does not play an important role of life or death

You're right, it doesn't. But we're no longer the hunter gatherer tribesmen and tribeswomen thousands of years ago. Most of us are not in any danger of starvation any more. So the argument of healthier is about living longer and being able to function better.

.

Bottom line, if we have evolved to be able to eat both, it means we can choose. Vegetarianism is better in so many ways as have already been mentioned.

I have a pet water bottle, it's the best ever.................................

This will help you take stress off your bodies functions to maintain homeostasis and will result in a long and healthy life

How will this take stress off you when you're worried about a million and 1 things that could make your meat consumption a bad experience (chemicals, toxins, habitat, method of butchery, method of cooking, preservatives, hormones...).

Methinks vegetarianism is a lot less stressful...

This argument is as stupid as saying banning war will put all those people in the weapons industry out of a job! They can find other things to do, surely...

.

Btw, no body is arguing that meat eating should be banned. We're simply saying Vegetarianism is better.