CreateDebate


Nana-llama's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Nana-llama's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Marijuana damages the brain in more than one way. If taken before a fully developed brain, I imagine it slows, and potentially stops progressive growth. A lot of people become lazy and mindless with it too. With a lack of healthy stimulation through productive means, the brain will never reach its peak state. In addition, one consuming weed is psychologically manipulating and warping the brains true reality. I’d assume this isn’t healthy.

1 point

Rice is grown, noodles are forged. Therefor, rice must be better than noodles. Takes up less land to make because of less ingredients associated with rice. Whereas a noodle has more, taking up more land and resources to make and consume. Plus, chicken curry on rice is my favorite.

1 point

Although I personally support prolife fellas one-hundred percent, I feel that the funds given would not be maximized. People who are in favor of abortion are rather bull-headed about it. If funds were given to a Koala breeding program, there would be guaranteed results.

Nana-llama(44) Clarified
1 point

Woah, a mankind hater huh. That’s a shame. Koalas are a rather cute creature I suppose.

1 point

When engaging in sexual acts with a penis and vagina, there is no guarantee whether or not a child may be conceived. A child should not have to grow up in a single parent home with an unknown father figure. Prostitution undermines the value of sex. Without a doubt unwanted child births, sexual diseases and abortions will be on the rise.

1 point

Well why not? Yes, he may have caused distraught to many, and he may not have been the first "person" to discover our great land, but he did bring England to this land. It may not have been a worldly discovery, but it was a discovery nonetheless. And you can't blame him for his actions. He was only but a confused white man. These people were foreign to him, he wasn't sure what to do so he resorted to the only thing he could think of that kept him safest.

0 points

Sprawled across the page, yes. Of course the records are real. They must be, unless we have all just imagined the same exact bible.

Do I believe the meaning behind the records? No. But it is for certain that the records themselves are real, just not what they have spilled out in ink.

3 points

I never mentioned anything what so ever in my comments about God controlling our actions. So, therefore your argument is somewhat invalid. I claimed for those of whom believing in God say that he is our Creator. So if that is to be true, then he is the one at fault for allowing ourselves to exist. So if God is to know the future he would've seen our horrendous behavior towards Earth. Plus, even given our so-called "Free will", he still made the ultimate choice to summon us into existence.

4 points

I've seen a few references to God on this prevalent issue. Though I don't fully disagree nor agree with his existence, I do find it peculiar how we twist the words of the bible and/or of God him(it)self. If such an existence is to be, then how are we to know the true ways. In no way do we hear from this prevailing force the words set upon us. We are only given our minds to comprehend things into our own viewpoints. So even if we are to hear the true words from this Ultimate Force won't we just make our individual interpretations rather than what was initially intended from the Creator. So how can one expect our minds to fully develop the knowledge of the truest comprehendance on each word thrown upon us.

Now even if certain individuals viewpoints on God is to be of physical form, then I still have yet to argue. Many supporters of God claim that climate change is, in fact, man-made. So if that's to be true in your eyes, then aren't you contradicting your "own" beliefs? You say God created us, yet we are the ones at fault for worldly issues. Doesn't it, in turn, break down to Gods fault. After all, he is the one who made the decision to bring us into form.

For those of you looking for certain biblical quotes to refer to, here you are---> http://www.whatchristianswanttoknow.com/bible-verses-about-creation-1-quotes-to- study/

2 points

According to this website presented by the AAAS, climate change has already revealed that it's definitely human induced to a degree (pun intended). So rather than keep debating with other public parties whether or not its human induced, we shall hence start focusing on how we can further prevent our man-made impact on our very own Earth. And for those of you who believe that our overall impact takes accumulative time, you would be somewhat wrong. Though the temperature increase within our atmosphere has taken time, there's direct causes of climate change as shown in the following article.

http://whatweknow.aaas.org/get-the-facts/ Note: This article/paper clearly states that this isn't just another paper, but it is an accumulative set of data, surveys, and studies within multiple consecutive years.

Nana-llama(44) Clarified
1 point

I much thank you for your clarification and knowledge held within such a topic. I will indeed make sure to read up more on these matters. Thanks again and good day sir.

1 point

This argument does not ask whether both heaven and hell are false. It clearly states whether or not hell can exist if heaven ceases to be.

1 point

I actually agree with much of what you have to say, and I myself have read plenty of books on studies such as us taking certain actions before we are consciously aware. Although it may not be a necessity to be fully aware and all knowing of individuals, I still see how things can get mangled, misinterpreted, and such if one cannot fully interpret another, thus leading to misguided conclusions. Though even having said so, I still definitely see your point and would actually appreciate it if you talked to me more on the subjective perception and existence beyond physical form (bodies). My stance on this topic was, and still remains inconclusive, though I partially believe love can be a misunderstanding my opinion still remains to be more thoroughly developed. If you so choose to further your explanations on such a topic I'd much appreciate that, but if you choose not to I'm still curious as to if you could please consider recommending some books for myself to read.

Nana-llama(44) Clarified
1 point

Yet a Genious knows himself to be a fool no matter their findings and apprehendance of certain topics.

1 point

But if you were to have more time would you still prefer checkers over chess?

1 point

And why do you claim that many people prefer short games over longer games?

Nana-llama(44) Clarified
1 point

I much agree with you on chess, but how can you say that chess is preferred by you if you've never played checkers?

1 point

Personally I prefer chess over checkers for I'm in love with the idea of trying to see all aspects of things, and chess forces you to do so. My dad taught me how to play ever since the ripe age of 6, and I've hence always enjoyed the complications that come with chess. Checkers is a simplistic game that doesn't nearly challenge your thought process as much. Thus leading to my love for chess. Chess, unlike checkers can it turn expand your mind and/or keep it fresh and speedy. How? Simple, a German study found that by planning chess you exercise each side of your brain which overall by doing so leaves you with a higher IQ, decreased chances of Alzheimers by improving memory, increased problem-solving, critical, and foreshadowing skills, and it also greatly improves your concentration and creativity skills.

Nana-llama(44) Clarified
1 point

No, I'm most definitely not saying your wrong. What I was trying to say was that I don't know if that's the exact angle the creator of this debate was going for. And at the time I was in serious mode so my apologies if my response came off as un nice. It's a good point but I believe that maybe you should make another point as well, but that is all up to you:) What you have now is perfectly fine though.

Nana-llama(44) Clarified
1 point

May you please extend and clarify further on such a statement?

Nana-llama(44) Clarified
1 point

You make a strong point about if we ourselves are even liable to make our own choices. And this is why I say that our predetermined neurological mindset captivates our interpretations of our personal experiences. So to a quite limited degree I believe we can make somewhat of an extent to our choices, but unfortunately, our biology on such matters predetermine how things will in turn happen.

Now in regards to your comment about what this has to do with whether or not love is a miss-understanding is essential to know. Through our choices we often find ourselves believing we create ourselves, and in a manner you can believe it and really feel and/or find comfort in believing that. This is how the miss-understanding comes in. No two people may ever expect to know and understand fully who they so as choose to be their lover. And if one cannot know and explore all aspects of another, they may never understand who the other is, for it is practically inexecutable. And if one lacks even the slightest miss-understanding of another, they lack the knowledge of also themselves in a manner. Our neurology keeps us remaining restrained in certain aspects, but whenever presented with new knowledge and/or ideas, we keep on developing our individuality and our thought process going. Unfortunately, because we can never know our own true selves or another we may never, in turn, fall in love But we can foolishly choose to have love, or at least our own sense of what we may individual believe as love.

1 point

I kind of see your point of view, although to some degree you are contradicting your own words.

4 points

Are you even taking all the information into account? Yes, I believe we all know climate change is indeed happening, but the fact still remains if it's manmade or not?

I definitely concur that we should take action and try to sustain our wondrously beautiful Earth, But unfortunately, this is not what this debate is currently about.We already know and are trying to take action upon such horrendous effects that have been made.

1 point

Though many people believe love is a feeling I would like to believe otherwise. Love is a choice and most likely not too much of a feeling. Yes, some may get their nerves excited or something like that, but one needs to keep in mind that feelings do not last forever. Emotions are based off of the neurological mind and/or genetics. So essentially we are just our father's father (and so on) prodigies and ultimate productions. We are indeed no I, for we are just all of our pre neurologically set experiences. So I suppose in light of that, love can, at many times be a miss-understanding, but I cannot possibly fully concede to my thoughts quite yet.


1 of 2 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]