so widespread and severe that its citizens HAVE TO CARRY FIREARMS.
Only in America do we have millions of unknown people illegally crossing our borders with the intent of joining gangs and selling illegal firearms. Your entire point is an example of left wing policies failing in a country with a massive border to protect.
Nothing you have posted addresses that illegal guns are everywhere in the US due to lax border control, that America is the most gang ridden country on Earth, and that much of America lives nowhere near a police force. Leave it to the left to create a gun problem then demand its citizens disarm by stating there are more guns, thus more gun murders. There are more gangs and guns due to leftist policies. That's not an argument to disarm the innocent but to arm them for their own safety. If you live in a safer country, the odds are it doesn't have gangs, guns and illegals pouring across its borders like we do.
Dems saying Republicans behind defund police movement are clearly lying
Democrats will lie about the color of grass so..
Should Republicans figure out what a straw man is??
That would be called a dodge. I'm now assuming you are cozy with whites acting like they own blacks and their opinions.
You supported procedures that bankrupted a third of businesses, and rather than own it, you reply uh, uh, uh, but pajama guy.
So says the guy who BELIEVES that Trump still IS the president, and he's going to save us from the lizard people, who fuck children and drink their blood.
Yeah, that guy.
No one believes that. You just tried, and not well, to avoid what you actually did, because lefties can't face when they support dumbass shit.
I'm not concerned because that situation is no different to how reality has always been
AKA "I've always lived under Capitalism, am not concerned about it, but will gripe about Capitalism anyway as I try to put a system in place that may be worse because I lack basic common sense and have feelings and emotions I need to emote."
Can you tell me what the BLM platform is?
The founders are openly Communist, so whatever it takes to divide the populace against each other by race.
The fact that the postmodernists dare to be Marxists is also something that I find I would say not so much intellectually reprehensible as morally repugnant and one of the things that the post modernists, postmodern Neo Marxists continually claim is that they have nothing but compassion for the downtrodden. And I would say that anybody with more than a cursory knowledge of twentieth century history who dares to claim simultaneously that they have compassion for the downtrodden and that their Marxists are revealing either their ignorance of history. That’s so astounding that it’s actually a form of miracle or a kind of malevolence that’s so reprehensible that it’s almost unspeakable.
Because we already ran the equity experiment over the course of the century and we already know what the Marxist doctrines have done for oppressed people all around the world and the answer to that mostly was imprison them and enslave them, work them to death or execute them.
And as far as I can tell that’s not precisely commensurate with any message of compassion and so I don’t think that the postmodern Neo Marxists have a leg to stand on ethically or intellectually or emotionally.
And I think that they should be gone on after as hard as possible from an intellectual perspective, an informed intellectual perspective and this is fundamentally a war of ideas and that’s the level of analysis that it should be fought upon.
And not only is it a war of ideas, I think it’s one that can be won because I think that the especially the French intellectual post modernists are a pack of what would you call them, well we could start with charlatans and that’s a good one. Pseudo intellectual would be good, resentful would be another and then I would also consider them highly, they’re highly deceptive in their intellectual strategies because almost all of them were Marxists student intellectuals and they knew by the time the Gulag Archipelago came out and even before that the nightmares of the Soviet Union and Maoist China were of such magnitude that they had completely invalidated any claim to ethical justification that the fundamental Marxist doctrines had ever managed to manifest.
And so it’s a no-go zone as far as I’m concerned. Intellectually the game’s over. We’ve already figured out that there are finite constraints on interpretation and we also understand why those exist and how they evolved and from the perspective of political argumentation there’s absolutely no excuse whatsoever in the 21st century to put forth Marxist doctrines as if they’re the bomb that’s needed by the "compassionate" that’s administered to the downtrodden.
Sorry, tried that didn’t work. We’ve got a hundred million corpses to prove it and that’s plenty for me and if it’s not enough for you well then you should do some serious thinking either about your historical knowledge or about your moral character.
Lol. What? I like burritos so that makes me racist? Good one.
You're racist towards tacos. Do you not know that the hard shell with meat and salad within its loins matters?
