CreateDebate


PuppetOfHam's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of PuppetOfHam's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

They are both consumables.

So is rat poison. A law against feeding it to babies is hardly the same as a law that says you can't feed babies food.

If you care about one and not the other, then you aren’t against laws concerning consumables as such, but only specific consumables.

See above. Then refer to my "don't give a rat's ass what you put in your body" point from earlier.

1 point

It shows that meth addiction being prevalent in commonly conservative areas does not indicate that conservatives are for legalizing drugs, even if its conservatives who are using them.

Not a particularly convincing argument seeing your position was "right wingers want to control what you put into your body" all while not controlling what they put into their bodies and even sharing it with each other while not caring some more.

1 point

Goddamn spellcheck.

Freudian slip? Jesus? Where? Where?

Think. The word was think.

Sure it was. It says hunk. No takebacks.

1 point

Great.

Not great. One party is pushing further and further toward more and more extreme views.

It made a point too.

Not one that helped your position. Rush doing opiods has little to do with a position that you don't even know if he takes, and it has zero to do with illegalizing steak.

Oh. I though it was that The left wants to tell us what we can and cannot put into our bodies. That’s not exclusively a left wing thing.

You still haven't shown any equivalence between drugs vs food. Illegalizing water isn't equivalent to illegalizing hair products, and in this analogy, the group is letting go of illegalizing hair products and moving center.

1 point

I’m assuming you don’t actually care that the left wants to tell us what we can and cannot put into our bodies

I created a debate about that very thing. You then created a red herring (drugs) to avoid the actual topic (food) all together.

but rather what they tell us we can or cannot put in our bodies

Illegalizing food is a rather disturbing position. Illegalizing a drug with known side effects is hardly comparable to illegalizing food. Agree or disagree?

1 point

No one knows who the hunk you are because no one even knows what that means.

1 point

I don’t think it’s the case that all social security fraud is a felony

1)Citation needed.

2)All Social Security fraud is a crime at minimum.

Even if you do find that one type of crime is more prevalent among immigrants, you haven’t shown that crime rates in general are higher.

It looks like he has. He provided data showing that almost all illegals commit at minimum two crimes. Being in the country illegaly and social security fraud. Most Americans are guilty of neither, and no Americans are guilty of being in the country illegaly.

1 point

Sounds like a good argument against using tax dollars to fund abortions and provide free condoms.

1 point

A) The Right moving Left doesn’t prove their original position to be Left.

It proves only one wing is moving toward the center rather than further into the extremist position.

B) Rush Limbaugh got addicted to pain pills. That doesn’t mean he is for legalization of opioids.

Cool story.

C) Personally? I’d rather be told I can’t do what I already don’t do. That’s not really the point though. The point is that your debate topic applies to the right on a different issue.

The topic is a left wing loon wanting to make steak illegal. You've ignored that point for 15 to 20 straight posts now.

1 point

The fact that there is an article that says “hey republicans too” makes my point.

Not really. It proves that what you said concerning who advocates for legal pot was objectively false.

Pointing out that Right wingers too want to tell us what we can and cannot put into our bodies does not justify what Left wingers are doing. Maybe change the title slightly.

I am assuming you cede that drug enforcement is hardly comparable to food enforcement, seeing you ignored debating the point.

1 point

None of the states where it is fully legal are very Right. That’s sufficient.

So you cede that Nazi Germany was left wing, and are unable to make the connection that drug use laws are hardly comparable to food prohibition. You are welcome to show me a steak eating's effects on a baby in the womb vs drug use.

1 point

Laws against drug use are right wing in nature.

Guess that kills the Hitler was a right winger myth.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.history.com/.amp/news/inside-the-drug-use-that-fueled-nazi-germany

https://newrepublic.com/article/141125/third-reich-addicted-drugs

Advocates to legalize pot have always been on the left.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.mic.com/articles/amp/174683/republicans-want-to-legalize-it-too-meet-the-conservatives-fighting-for-marijuana-reform

States that have recreational pot fully legal are predominantly left.

Libs are known for jumping off the cliff hoping they can fly. Usually their positions backfire on society. But mainly, being cautious to legalize a drug for play, that does have known side effects vs criminalizing eating steak is hardly comparable.

1 point

10 Have it fully legalized, and they are lefty states

There are "lefty states" where it isn't fully legal. Care to explain that one?

1 point

A)Which means the right moved left for it to be legal at all in that part of the country. Not exactly drug Nazism.

B)And the meth capital of America is? Trump country.

http://mediad.publicbroadcasting.net/p/khpr/files/styles/x large/public/201605/2014map.jpg

Guess that killed your "right wingers judging everybody for drugs" narrative.

C)If we assumed you were right for argument's sake, would you rather be told you can't smoke meth or that you can't eat a steak?

1 point

Looks like about half or more has it legalized, meaning obviously the right wing position has morphed left.

Ever notice the left never comes right? They just keep going further left? I've noticed it too.

Next, right wing states are known for heavy meth use. Do you deny this?

http://forums.tcm.com/topic/257824-jimmy-kimmel-says-trump-supporters-are-meth-users/

1 point

Everyone I know goes to church. Nobody cares. Many advocated for marijuana due to its use for certain conditions. 1980 called and wants you to stop pretending we're still in that decade.

The DEA enforces laws, not right wing political positions.

1 point

Don't care either way. I don't personally know any right winger who gives a flying rat's ass if you take drugs.

The DEA enforces laws, not right wing political positions.

1 point

Most right wing states have legalized marijuana. As for harder drugs, the FDA isn't right wing. It's the FDA.

And of course it took a Trump administration to get "right to try" passed.

-1 points

Roses are red

Lemons are sour

Open ur legs and give me an hour

Kissing Is A Habit

Fucking Is A Game

Guys Get All The Pleasure

Girls Get All The Pain

10 Minutes Of Pleasure

9 Months Of Pain

3 Days In The Hospital

A Baby Without A Name

The Baby Is A Bastard

The Mother Is A Whore

This Woulda Never Happend If The Rubber Hadn't

Tore!!

Sex is like math

You subtract the clothes

Add the bed

Divide the legs

And Pray to god

You dont multiply

Roses are red

Grass is green

Open your legs

And I'll fill you with cream

Hickory dickory dock

This bitch was suckin my cock

The clock struck two

I dumped my goo

And dumped her to the end of the block

Sex is good

Sex is fine

Doggy Style & 69

Just for fun

Or gettin paid

Everyone likes gettin laid

Sex is evil

Sex is a sin

Sins are forgiven

So stick it in!!!

roses are nice

violets are fine.

ill be the six

if you be the nine.



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]