Cheney is down 30 points in the polls.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/
Liz Cheney is reviled by most Republicans for being very dishonest and a RINO and has no chance of winning re-election due to that fact. She's a part of the same Clinton Bush mafia style political machine. And if we used your logic, she would only be proof that Republicans can think for themselves. The opposite of a cult. You also keep saying it's a cult despite knowing Trump voters have booed him before. Cultists don't boo their candidate. Cultists believe everything the media says despite proof of the media lying nonstop like lunatics.
That Trump was acquitted in the Republican Senate, only means there's a Trump CULT in the right wing..
It means they had no proof. I watched the proceedings. It was a complete joke. The Democrats offered emotions and conjecture and proof of nothing other than a dosier that even CNN says is fake. CNN must be tired of losing court suits over defamation, libel and slander.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.
It's just LESS wrong than forcing a woman to carry her baby to term.
So murder is less wrong than letting a person live. Makes perfect sense.
For the record, let me be clear about my views on abortion.. It's WRONG
The only way it can be wrong is if it's murder.
And, BEFORE the Texas snitch on your neighbor law, if you called the cops to report an abortion, they'd LAUGH at you..
By laugh you mean they wouldn't enforce something that isn't a law.
I can't, of course.. All I got is, if it looks like a duck, and quacks like duck, it's a duck..
Show me what you have that looks and quacks like a duck.
But, the 1/6 committee has proof
Adam Schiff said he had proof of Russian collusion. We still haven't seen it to this day. According to transcipts of him being under oath, he knew all along there was no proof.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/all-the-adam-schiff-transcripts-11589326164
And guess who's on the 1/6 Committe who says there's proof. Adam Pinnochio Schiff.
https://www.axios.com/2021/09/23/
Telling the cops about a murder where someone killed a baby in its crib is called a testimony in court, which is both parties' position. Killing someone is murder in court, which is both parties' position. No Democrat lawyer on Earth would object to that position, and neither would you just so long as I never told you the location of the baby. No Democrat judge would need to know if the baby was killed inside or outside. It'd be murder either way. Prosecuting murder is normal and correct. Sending the military after Constitutionally protected property while throwing their owners in prison is Fascism.
If ANYBODY handed it over to Biden, it was Mike Pence.. When facing a coup d'état, he protected America too..
Pence did his legal job just like every other day, you can't show us any "Trump coup" despite it being requested numerous times, and you handed it to Biden because it was you, not us, who voted for the carnage you see now. Only you pulled that lever or put an X on that box. I voted for $1.25 gas, food on the shelves and the lowest unemployment in the last 50 years. What you see now is the result of closing down businesses, sending manufacturing from America across the world (globalism), and a President Joe Biden who Obama said is good at f*ing things up. You voted for and supported that.
There's alot to say. In fact you just got a long line of info on what the obvious difference is. One goes after a citizen for practicing a Constitutional right specifically called an inalienable right. The other punishes a murder just as Democrat lawyers punish murder in court every day because murder is clearly wrong. If I took a baby out of the womb and put him or her on a table, and someone smashed its head with a hammer, suddenly you'd think it was murder too, and the only difference is its location. If you kill a baby in the bedroom, it's murder. If you kill a baby in the bathroom, it's murder. Where you killed it makes no difference. You still killed it. It's still murder. If I shove a crying baby back into a womb, that doesn't mean killing them is now somehow moral.
There's quite a difference between testifying against someone who just killed someone else and knocking down someone's door to grab their gun despite them killing no one. In fact, you wanted Kyle Rittenhouse to go to prison for killing someone in self defense. We want someone to have a mild penalty for literally killing someone else, and not in self defense. Our position is the same as giving you a punishment for killing an infant in its crib. Your punishment is an attempt to go after someone who has killed no one and to subvert inalienable rights given in the Constitution. Yours is Nazi Germany. Ours is enforcing punishment on murder as Democrat lawyers do every day in court because murder is met with punishment in any civil society even according to the left.
In 1931, Weimar authorities discovered plans for a Nazi takeover in which Jews would be denied food and persons refusing to surrender their guns within 24 hours would be executed. They were written by Werner Best, a future Gestapo official. In reaction to such threats, the government authorized the registration of all firearms and the confiscation thereof, if required for “public safety.”
The policy you just described is what was called the “Malicious Attacks Law" in Nazi Germany. Guns, speech they didn't like etc were reported by your kids and neighbors to the authorities.
https://www.amazon.com/
I dunno HOW you missed it, but it's the gun nuts who're threatening the government, not the other way around..
The left attacked a federal courthouse, took over city blocks for weeks, ran the President into a bunker, burned down a Presidential church near the Whitehouse, destroyed a security post near the whitehouse and waved the Communist flag while doing it to your delight. By the government, you mean the left.
Saying bat shit crazy towards bronto still doesn't make you a Jew, and the Chinese would bury you.
I don't think it is necessarily intelligence which is the issue for most people. The problem is more with the ability to understand and apply reason, and one of the biggest factors impacting that is capitalism. To subscribe to capitalism requires being taught to value the emotional side of the brain and the pleasure centre above the logical side of the brain which deals with reason
Trade is a natural survival instinct based in the left side of the brain. Even monkeys and apes do it. What is not natural or instinctual is to think that other animals will gather apples then freely give them to animals that refuse to gather anything themselves. It's an appeal to emotion, that the other animals will accept you into the herd as an equal rather than to parasitically use you for your stupidity.
