Smashy smashy!

On a similar note, when I was at school, a friend of mine received a letter home from a teacher complaining that she wasn't completing her homework. Her mother therefore threw her TV out of the third story window as punishment.

Chill, dude, all that anger isn't good for you. Try to find some sort of release, a sport maybe?

I've not been made aware of any replies from you concerning militarism.

But if you were to eat bread and drink wine in a non-religious setting, without observing rituals of Christianity, and without thinking about praising God whilst doing so, then it would NOT be holy communion, it would just be bread and evening drinks.

It was not "don't ask don't tell" for straight people. If a straight man let on to his buddy that he slept with a woman the night before, would he be discharged? No! Would a straight man have to pretend that his boyfriend was actually just his roommate? Of course not! DADT was excessively hard on gay men, for no reason other than the continuation of an outdated policy.

You are trying to tell me that you are supposedly educated enough to have studied anything in detail, and yet you still cannot differentiate between 'your' and 'you are'?

Yeah, I call fake.

If you wish to only drink bottled water, be my guest. You are only wasting your own money with your paranoia.

Traditional yoga might be, modern yoga isn't. I strongly suggest you go to a yoga class so you actually know what you're talking about. I think you would find it informative.

So what? Do you think most yoga classes around the world focus on Hindu beliefs? Hell to the No! My local church hall has a yoga class in there, which just goes to show how outdated and excessive you views are.

Not where I live it isn't. Don't be so ethnocentric.

Secondly, you do realise that bottled water is in many cases just tap water, right? That's complete with all those lovely carcinogens from your mains supply.

Then why is their a problem in your eyes? Why should homosexuals have less rights than heterosexuals?

Three things; firstly, stop clogging the boards with repeatedly posting in order to bolster you side score.

Secondly, for the love of God learn to reply to an argument properly as opposed to just heading your post with their name, and finally, please, please proof read what you write. You are not helping yourself.

I think drinking bottled water is one of the most ridiculous things people regualy do, however, it is up to the consumer to make their own idiotic decisions. Why should we ban something people buy and therefore stimulates the economy? Sure, it's a mostly stupid product, but so are a lot of things.

If someone is at risk of killing civilians of their own country, or serving men of mine, I do not care if they are dirt poor or if they were raised in multi-million dollar mansions. Their personal finances are irrelevant.

I think the operative word in the title is "overly", as opposed to "at all".

You say "occupies" as if we are Germany occupying France. We are in Afghanistan working with the Afghan national army and indigenous population to quell terrorism.

Whilst I agree that they should not be stopped, I would disagree that they are a sign of refined society. A refined society does not feel a need to kill its criminals.

The sexuality isn't a part of their military career. Whilst military men and women do have sex, they do so on their own time, and what happens in their own time, legally, between consenting adults is not the business of the military.

Or you could read where I said "The concept of...gravity".

I also find it quite rich that you are calling me an idiot when there is no semblance of punctuation in your post.

That is what i am saying; have a rule saying that it cannot be practised on the school property without permission if at all. You completely misread my post.

Not the same thing. It's manufactured by Gerber in my home town.

I thought it was never FDA approved in the US?

(50 characters)

I haven't ha cheetos in years- thanks for making me crave them :P

Do they still come with a tattoo?

Then ban it as an un-organised sport. Some schools teach parkour in PE, or as an extracurricular, and it is therefore fully insured.

No, of course not, Firstly, where do you draw the "dangerous" line? Do you draw it at parkour, or do you draw it at football or rugby?

Are they talking about banning students from doing things outside school, or in it? If it is outside school, then they have no right to interfere. For instance, what if a child's father wind surfs, and they have also done so since a young age? Should they be stopped from doing so because the school says so?

The propersition is ludicrous.

Except that flys in the face of the right to be free from cruel or unusual punishment.