CreateDebate


Sinknight's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Sinknight's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

A tip if anything is a sign of merit to your service, even if it was insignificant as signing up a guy to join a social gathering club. I wouldn't be burdened or concerned so much on this issue. It isn't at all inappropriate to give a tip to a stranger, it's if anything supporting the "cause." Accept it or deny it and move on.

If you are speaking about tipping in terms of being a waiter then its pretty essential. Being a waiter means you get below minimum thus, tips are actually a part of your paycheck.

What you should consider is if it was a sufficient tip but you don't need too because it was an accidental tip so its positive if anything else. Now if he gave a $2 tip after he had a bill of $50 then that would be indecent of him (I usually give tips around 10% of the bill.)

1 point

What? Understand that the concept of porn isn't anything of a illegal premise on a broad spectrum. If your just referring to the porn the common 18 or 40 year old watches to beat his meat too, then it's nothing illegal. Sure, it could be immoral in your book but such partisan view isn't applicable to everyone.

The title of this debate certainly is strange as if it implied that porn is gradually being "banned." Child pornography is already illegal so I don't really see anything else that needs to be censored or removed in the porn world in legal context.

1 point

Well even if you disprove their deity can't they just reshape their ideas again so that it becomes valid? A step back, can't a deist design such a broad deity that it would be pretty much impossible to disprove (i.e. since god is (god) he is everything and also nothing, he isn't a physical being but a thought like the "mandate of heaven." But, that is just a brief makeshift example.

1 point

I wonder who this person is ?

2 points

Everyone does deserve assured safety but, in the natural context no one is going to be safe from what the world brings us. Torture, rape, etc. might be the human infringements we do but, we will always be in fear and insecurity to what isn't human. Countless disasters occur that aren't from us humans and we can only pray we bought some good insurance.

Hence, it wouldn't matter if everyone is granted safety because in the end no one is guaranteed safety and will be subject to uncontrollable events, things we must brave through.

1 point

But people interpret the bible differently so how is a denomination or any branch suppose to assume one branch is right? Essentially, maybe a branch isn't going astray from the bible but just seeing it in a different perspective but, people will state they are wrong because it isn't how they interpret it. My understanding is that as long as you believe in the holy trinity your a supposed Christian.

Sinknight(518) Clarified
1 point

In bettering my understanding on this matter:

If there is a fundamental standard in being a Christian, couldn't other groups see that standard differently otherwise? Or is what your mentioning just from what your branch of Christianity states and not the general mass (the other thousands of Christian denominations.) Jehovah Witnesses believe they are Christians in their own sense of Christianity, does that make them wrong? (http://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/are-jehovahs-witnesses-christians/ )

Sinknight(518) Clarified
1 point

Oh I didn't think we were putting it into the perspective of this debate, I assumed we was speaking about fapping in general. To answer your question it depends but I can leave you with "the real thing always is better."

15 points

How can we born good or evil if we born not knowing what GOOD or EVIL is. We are born ignorant and if you consider ignorance to be bad or good it really is subjective to a situation. No one can be born good or bad because they haven't develop personality or displayed good or bad traits yet, its when we live and get conformed by our surrounding when we show our colors.

Sinknight(518) Clarified
1 point

Some (or majority) of men would find that to be pleasureful than a punishment... :l

4 points

However if all branches of Christianity follow different standards, doctrine, ideals and concepts, what makes Mormons any different from the 30,000-40,000 Christian denominations who go by different beliefs? Is there even a common mold for a Christian to go by?

1 point

Of course and its not really the NBA just deciding this, the Clippers team and Doc have seem to come to reason that playing for someone who views them as inferiors is utterly pointless. The NBA commissioner has the authority as long as he holds the infallible facts and Sterling knows his actions (even though I feel it was a setup.) Its a truly a double edged sword for Sterling: keep the ownership and the team abandons him or give it up in general, hes going to suffer either way and keeping it would only make the common masses despise him more.

1 point

I mean of course its worse being a women. I mean as a guy I have many methods of escaping my issues: wife or not. But, going through menstruation is something you cannot escape from, its going to occur whether you like it or not. There is no real argument...

Sinknight(518) Clarified
9 points

Yup !

1 point

It honestly doesn't matter to me but, I can see where managers and employers would feel uncomfortable in hiring young people. Primarily in the medical field, patients wouldn't feel as comfortable having a fresh out the door registered surgeon than a old and experienced doctor. When officials employ these new surgeons, attorneys, etc. they have to the realize that patients and victims are wanting the best out of them which generically is the Johnnie Cochran attorney who has reputation, the elderly wise look, and disposition that would grasp the victim's attention.

9 points

Our heart just pumps our blood it holds no emotional nor mental components. Its simple to say that its our brain that provides us our feelings towards someone or something.

1 point

Cause sex is "cool" .

1 point

You can slap a woman whenever just like you could slap a man any time you want. Is it morally wrong? Well, women want to be equal to men then they should be able to take that burden of being treated like men. Personally, hitting anyone is wrong unless necessary regardless if your male or female.

1 point

Well, atheists are definitely vast intellects because they aren't discipline by god, they are free to believe in whatever they want whenever they want. This makes their views on god really unpredictable however. Many theists see god as a revered being with ground laws but then again there are MANY different views of what god is. WE theists have no MATURE idea of god because WE don't know him/her/it just stories and recollections from past events, we can just assume a omnipotent god (deism.) This question really should be: Everyone has a very immature idea of what god is...

1 point

OF COURSE, we are humans the most we can do is be approximate to what god wants us to be.

Christians judge people which they arent suppose too.

There is even a haircut they must follow by and certainly not all abide to that.

Sinknight(518) Clarified
1 point

Well, clearly im a politician. Its only necessary that I have some sort of security prereference.

No, games are not illegal from where I dwell.

0 points

no .

Sinknight(518) Clarified
1 point

Political Security Name

Its to ensure the safety of a politician by making up a username that

should have some kind of military vocab within it.

1 point

Trolling should be legal .


1 of 15 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]