The only liar here is you.

So you are delusional as well as dishonest? That's nice. Now, how about that quote I asked for, you pitifully stupid cunt?

Obviously, you admit to being biased: "Of course I am biased"

You seem to have missed the obvious sarcasm in that remark while you were busy chopping up my sentences and rearranging them to mean the things you want them to mean.

Then, you implied that the other criticism were also true: "to try to fool people into believing I wanted to achieve these things, when all I actually wanted to do was tell the truth. "

The quoted statement says absolutely nothing about whether the accusations are true. It says they aren't relevant to the topic. If I claim the theory of a flat Earth isn't relevant to my topic does that mean I "implied" the flat Earth theory is true?

Fuck off you intellectual retard. You're a liar and an idiot.

I pointed out that your post was obviously biased

You pulled a random accusation of bias out of your asshole.

which you yourself acknowledge is the case.

I acknowledged that I am biased in the same way I am biased against the geocentric model of the universe. It isn't my fault that you are too stupid to understand the implications of that statement.

If you pay any thought to what you write

Your insults only show your own childishness and stupidity.

you may have noticed that you both claimed my remark regarding your bias was the basis for a rebuttal (which is in of itself absurd)

Right. So failing to agree with your completely baseless accusation which was not supported by anything remotely resembling evidence is "absurd". Gotcha. Burden of proof is on me to disprove your random bullshit. Conservatism in its absolute element.

and that it's entirely irrelevant to the topic at hand

You are deceitfully isolating the word "bias" from your initial attack, which also concerned my civility and my wit. This is dishonest and stupid. Also dishonest and stupid is pulling random accusations of bias out of your idiotic asshole and expecting other people to disprove them.

What are you talking about?

Your inability to understand English is not my problem. It is proof of the validity of the opening post.

Let's take the two statements I was referring to, and use them in the manner I stated:

Let's not because the only person who enjoys reading the idiotic, convoluted gibberish you type is you. You can't structure coherent paragraphs so I do not have a fucking clue why you are using a debating site. You are an idiot. It is fortunate for you that your own narcissism is blocking your view of this self-evident fact.

Now, where's my claim that you're wrong because you're biased?

You are a retard. Now where's my claim that you are wrong because you are a retard?

Pretending you do not know the obvious implications of your own attack, when the implications are the reason you made the attack in the first place, is childish, stupid, and has absolutely no point. It's a waste of your time as much as mine.

You really are proving that the assertions in the OP are absolutely accurate.

And when was this?

This was when you randomly pulled the word "bias" out of your asshole and tried to use it as a weapon.

The sad thing about this statement is that the one it's supposedly refuting itself serves as a perfect refutation to it.

The sad thing about your infantile circular argument is that it applies to every fact in the known universe. Bananas are yellow? You're just saying that because you're biased. Bruce Willis is bald? Well, what a thoroughly "unbiased" argument that is!! Like I mentioned once already, you are a petulant child using playground rhetoric and expecting a serious reply.

Such as?

Such as everything you have thus far said.

serving to facilitate a meaningful discussion

You decided to start a "meaningful discussion" by ignoring the topic and using sarcasm to launch a series of unprovoked personal attacks? I must say that's quite a long-winded way to go about it. Why not just post your opinion about the topic instead?

Given the rampant, baseless namecalling on display

So you expect not to be called names in response to your unprovoked personal attacks? That's awesome. Would you like a lollipop instead? I have green or blue.

You said all three of his red herrings were true

Quote where I said that you fucking liar.

"Stupid and morally wrong" in your thoroughly unsubstantiated opinion.

I was making a point you fucking idiot. You implied (falsely) that I think Conservatism is stupid because of bias, but the reality is I am biased against Conservatism because it is stupid. You might as well accuse me of being "biased" against the geocentric model of the universe, you complete raging moron.

I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt

I'm going to ask you to stop saying stupid things to me.

I fail to see how sarcastic slights qualify as a distraction tactic

Then you are a fucking retard, aren't you? Your "sarcastic slights" had nothing to do with the topic. They were empty personal attacks which, if anything, prove the validity of the opening post.

This based on what?

This is based on me knowing I had no intention of being witty or civil.

How can you claim me to be implying anything with my statement other than that your original post holds none of the aforementioned virtues?

Because your"statement" has nothing to do with the topic and is an unjustified personal attack. Do you need a diagram?

Are you claiming the aforementioned virtues (specifically civility) to be of secondary concern?

They are of no concern whatsoever, secondary or otherwise, because none of them have anything to do with my topic. You offered no argument, but instead attempted to seize the moral high ground and then blew raspberries at me. You are nothing more than a petulant child.

You just agreed with everything he said

No I didn't. I explained that he was throwing out red herrings. Is basic reading comprehension perhaps not your greatest strength?

Can you please stop pretending atheists are the ones who believe in magic, when the truth is the exact opposite? Atheists believe science did it. Christians believe a magical being called God did it. That's the reality, so your word games are merely testament to the fact that you lack anything remotely resembling a good argument.

unbiased

Of course I am biased against things which are stupid and morally wrong. You threw three red herrings out there (witty, unbiased and civil) to try to fool people into believing I wanted to achieve these things, when all I actually wanted to do was tell the truth. You should try it sometime instead of having a tantrum whenever someone criticises your faith. Your apparent theory that Conservatives should be able to do anything they like to the world and the others in it without suffering "bias" is quite clearly fucking ridiculously stupid. Do you take the same position when you talk about Maoists or Stalinists you snivelling hypocrite?

You don't like trickle down?

Trickle down economics is pseudo-intellectual bullshit. By the time any money from the top of the pyramid has "trickled down" to the bottom, it is no longer worth what it was worth when it was at the top. The scarcer money is the more it is worth. If there is a sudden abundance of it at the bottom then all that achieves is the relative devaluation of the currency.