CreateDebate


SportsAnimal's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of SportsAnimal's arguments, looking across every debate.

Don't understand even the basics of how chemotherapy works or are anti-science I see.

Exposing PEOPLE to tremendous amounts of UV ("So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous — whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light") - DUMB!

Everything is poisonous if used in too high of an amount. That's why tanning booths and chemo doctors use less amounts.

Funny.. I didn't read where they're shoving UV light bulbs up anybody's ass.

Then you don't know much about chemotherapy.

https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/find-a-clinical-trial/a-study-looking-type-light-treatment-with-chemotherapy-cancer-head-neck

I'm going to cover you with honey and dump duck feathers all over you while putting a Ronald Reagan mask on your head.

If you vote Democrat, you'll vote for Bernie who praises Fidel Castro or Biden who is obviously in serious cognitive decline.

No one doubts that you are a leftist to control blacks.

We know which group survival of the fittest would keep in its ranks if not for social programs keeping these loons from extinction.

Have you ever cooperated with someone or considered them your equal? Yeah? Well I guess that kills your "socialism is bad" narrative.

No it doesn't. You, burritolunch, claimed to be rich, not just making money for survival.

Your comparison would only make sense if FrogofLondon was anti socialist while traveling to another country for free healthcare or the equivalent.

2 points

Can you make good energy policy if you BELIEVE oil will last forever??

Show us the realistic other choices. Nevermind, there are none, which is why we keep using oil. Libs would go crazy for years, yelling for it back if oil was yanked from our reality. Libs like to say environmental things to feel good within the hive, but behind closed doors, love every bit of the stuff they carry on about because they are attention whores.

39 scientists who specialise in climate science who say it's a hoax. Must be the ones who don't have to come up with left wing results to get grants and funding. And it's just one list. There are thousands who agree with them who would be on other lists. It also doesn't say how many give no definitive opinion.

Looks like someone is anti-science.

That economy's looking great isn't it AlofRI?


1 of 3 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]