I really don't get how if the trinity is one triune god that Jesus doesn't know when god will send him, even though they are the same person.

There is more than likley an answer, but until I find it it's puzzling as all get-out.

I've only played Dota2, and It has better streamers, so yeah. Awesome.

Provided you don't get ripped off in shipping and handling charges, the variety, price, and convince of ordering from your home far outweigh using gas money to drive to a selected spot using your time as well to get something that you could have gotten over the internet...

Easier

Faster

Better

More.

Considering that George Washington's empire tried to rebel against him only a few years after he had it, the choice is obvious.

A big problem is that Christians when arguing that their god is the ideal one (on issues such as gay marriage, celibacy, baptism, universal salvation, etc)

Resort to the True Scotsman fallacy that they are not a chrisian if they believe in one specific god.(or Ariana)

In a monarchy you at least know you don't have a choice :)

How about we saw Mexico off the bottom of the U.S and make them swim?

Eh, if you believe in Christian universalism, there is no choice.

If that did happen, it would pretty much make whoever had the technology infinitely powerful/rich, and basically do whatever they want.

It's at least better then the gospel of wealth, which has 90% tax rates for the top 1%

It's obvious if you believe that a Free will and omnipresenticism can combine to make something other then the disproof of god you are sadly mistaken.

They may be able to do manual labor or other such tasks generally frowned upon by society, so they definitely have a use.

Provided that it has some backing in material goods, so it'S stable, then yes.

To be content, not nessecrily pleased. The nessecary inclusion of many ways is just a route, to that sudden stop everyone takes.

"1. It is possible that a maximally great being (MGB) exists.

2. If it is possible that a MGB exists, then a MGB exists in some possible world.

3. If a MGB exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world.

4. If a MGB exists in every possible world, then it exists in the actual world.

5. If a MGB exists in the actual world, then a MGB exists.

6. Therefore a MGB exists.

The Last time I had one, a Super Cell was within 5-10 minutes of destroying our house and killing us.

Waking up when it was on the ground would be suicide.

Taxes were approximately 4% back then. The only reason we aren't rebelling now is because of our standard of living.

Precisely. If you start the defense before the attack, why would people not attack?

It's inevitable that if the option is there it is going to happen.

Repeat offenders on the other hand...

As If I need a reason to say yes. I mean really, it's beer.

I have to say, If I have to start off an argument from anything, it is our ability to appreciate things that have no practical application, such as looking at a sunset or a painting, as well as our intense pursuit of entertainment.

I would say that it is plausible normally, but how it is supposed to get here without dying( Assuming it is uninvolved life.) is what makes me doubt this one.

If you mean saved as in delayed death (Which with our technology, will still happen anyway), then I fully agree. Otherwise, that simply isn't true.

+1 points for clarification.

Just expand #1.

1) It is possible given an infinite amount of time, then an infinite amount of things would exist. (Premise)

2) The Flying Spaghetti monster is timeless (Premise)

3) If an infinite amount of things exist, then everything would eventually be encompassed in that infinity. (From 1)

4) The Flying Spaghetti Monster would therefore exist then. (From 1 and 3)

5) The flying Spaghetti Monster Exists. (From 2 and 4)