Also a spokesperson for the committee has admitted multiple errors. In one case Schiff attributes a text to Jim Jordan, and it was from someone else. He also deleted key punctuation to make the text appear angrier rather than with pauses that make it come off normal. The committee spokesperson openly admits this.
I've shown you video of Trump saying "be peaceful today," on January, 6th. That didn't make us cool. It made you double down on lying.
Right. So I have the right to shoot you in the face because you are making me feel threatened.
You've already claimed you want Corbyn to take this position. You're a liar.
In other words no rebuttal. I gladly accept your white panty flag.
Do underwater volcanoes explain any ice melts and temperature rises in the oceans?
Maybe. But volcanoes don't change the fact that science hates you.
So an admittance of me being correct. Good.
Are we simply in a part of the climate shift where temperatures rise naturally due to the tilt changing of the Earth over time?
No.
Wild Speculation.No data to back up your claim.
If temperatures have slightly risen, is this current, mildy risen temperature, better or worse than when it was a degree cooler? Why or why not?
You're not thinking long term enough.
Tell us how long term to think. And if the climate seems fine, why would I assume it's getting worse, seeing most of the worst hurricanes on record aren't recent?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ListofdeadliestAtlantichurricanes
So stop referring to ancient civilizations and try to dispute the indisputable fact that humans are emitting gases that trap heat in the atmosphere.
Demonstrate to me that gases being trapped in the atmosphere isn't due to natural phenomenon. Then provide me data from any other time period to compare it to. Oh wait. I gave you the best data available. That data of another time period is? Cities were covered over with water not that long ago but before industrialization. Was it because "gases trapped heat in the atmosphere"?
The climate had nothing to with the onset of ice ages
THE NATURE OF ICE AGES
Ice ages are times when the entire Earth experiences notably colder climatic conditions
The climate had nothing to with the onset of ice ages you daft bastard. Ice ages are caused by the Milankovitch cycles. Read a book for fuck's sake. You are embarrassingly stupid.
God you're an uneducated idiot.
But you didn't agree they were two separate things
I never made any claim that human caused change is the same as natural chsnge. I claim there is no human change in the first place.
Ice ages are caused by the Milankovitch cycles
Cool. How do you know which part of the cycle we are in? Is this the part where the temperature rises a mild tad like perhaps when much of Alexandria somehow wound up under the sea? Or did the ancient Egyptians cause thousands of cities to be covered by ocean waters by their emmitting carbon with their 2,000 year old automobiles?
I read it. I could easily refute its hypothesis and explanations. You can't even describe what is in them because you don't understand them. If you did, you would have explained them earlier when I asked.
One explanation for the hypothesis was sea level rising. I just pointed out many pre industrial revolution cities being deep under water.
Another explanation for the hypothesis was antarctic ice melts. I pointed out earlier that there are volcanoes under the antarctic ice.
Another explanation for the hypothesis was ice cap melts from a few decades of data concerning satelite imagery. The problem is we have no satelite imagery of any other time period in history to know if this is a normal cyclic pattern that happens every few decades or centuries or so. For all we know the slow shifts of the Earth cause this by its altered tilt, among many other factors, such as sun spots and flares.
There are links to sixteen different data centres listed as references at the bottom of the article you retarded little twat.
Then why don't you just explain their content to us. We are waiting.
Your copy and paste nowhere tells us any data or tells us why or how on anything. You continue to avoid telling us how or why, or present us any actual specific data. It should be easy if you are right.
You are a complete fucking idiot
I'm far more intelligent than you are.
who would deny his own nose for the sake of making money.
I make no money off of carbon emissions.
Deliberately confusing natural historical variations in the Earth's climate with human-induced global warming is pretty stupid, given that 97 percent of climatologists agree they are two separate things.
Agreeing they are two seperate things doesn't mean man actually IS causing it. Even if you could, which you've shown no data as of yet, the Chinese are the biggest emissions producer, and they laugh at your rules.
