CreateDebate


TimCast's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of TimCast's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

The right has tried to shrink the power of government the left has expanded it. What did you expect from a political party that supports censorship, freezing bank accounts of people who are convicted of no crime but say things they don't like, likes investigations of political rivals and FBI raids on their opponents' homes? I would expect cameras everywhere if I were you. Social scores and wrong think punishments are already here. Can't wait to see what the authoritarian left gives us next. Organ harvesting? Welding people in their homes during Covid? The Chi Coms do it, and leftist politicians keep telling us how great the CCP is.

0 points

Let it be noted that Silly was unable to disprove the claim or form a formal argument for the defense. Also let it be noted that Silly pretended to copy and paste from mediabiasfactcheck, and that what he or she posted in bold did not match what was actually on the mediabiasfactcheck site. For example, Silly posted

Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

The credibility rating on the actual site was "MIXED" and not "LOW" as Silly falsely transcribed. The rest of what he or she put in bold followed in the same way.

2 points

I'm a liberal, and the link links to a liberal named Tim Pool. I, Tim Pool, attended Occupy Wallstreet.

1 point

When I saw it was the Tim guy, my LIAR, LIAR, PANTS ON FIRE, alarm bell went off..

Care to demonstrate which statement in this video or any past videos was false?

1 point

In terms of this journalist, it's my view that he was searched, NOT because he was investigating Biden, but because a lawful search warrant was issued..

The NAZIs in the 1930s and 1940s issued warrants. What exactly was the warrant for do you suppose?

1 point

A strawman is to intentionally recreate your opponents' argument and attack an argument they never made because it's easier to debate against your version of their argument than their actual argument. The sentence used in this case is called a question.

1 point

Wondering more why you're ignoring this.

https://youtu.be/GTxUFZH_KEk

1 point

Project Veritas has never lost in court against anyone. Not one single time, and Snopes is a far left "fact checker" site that has had to delete many claims due to defamation and false information in court.

In the link you provided, nowhere does it disprove the person in question having actually said the exact thing Project Veritas claimed they said. Snopes saying they don't like this or that does not erase the person actually saying on video, "yes, voter ID would cut down on fraud, and we plan on bussing people to the voting booths."

https://kreately.in/epic-a-rw-group-that-has-never-lost-a-legal-battle-sues-the-newyorktimes-for-defamation/

2 points

It's not a court case, so don't need a charge, but let's go with insighting an insurrection by bailing out ANTIFA members who attacked federal buildings and took over city blocks while armed.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN2360SZ

2 points

You didn't watch the video or read the article. The man in question, John Sullivan, broke into the capitol building by force and begain giving instructions to others to follow him and gave them instruction on what to do. This isn't speculation. He's facing prison charges for insurrection, amongst other charges. He was paid $35,000 by CNN and $35,000 by NBC, equaling $70,000. His identity and political persuasion have been proven in court. He goes on livestream videos as ANTIFA and is known for it. He also holds ANTIFA rallies.

2 points

At first, they blamed ANTIFA for the riot. Now, they EMBRACE it. Said it was GOOD.

You've said on this forum that you are the resistence. One would think you would applaud resistence if you really were the resistence.

-2 points

1 of 2 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]