Yeah, beautiful stuff for gullible people, warmers and the like.
So conspiracy theories like 9/11 government job are more to your liking, huh?
The progressives' plan is to tear down civilisation and culture to have a reason to "come to the rescue". Their plan already works quite nicely in urban areas where crime and mayhem is rampant.
Ah yes, the conspiracy theories, they must never be missed.
Of course 9/11 was a government job, wasn't it?
It depends on the case. The syndrome could have a positive effect when it gives the child a feeling of being taken care of which is a very important factor in child development. On the other hand, when a child is poisoned by the parent because of the proxy Munchhausen syndrome it's necessary to separate the parent from the child.
The decision for an administrative measure must not be based on the syndrome but the behavior of the parent.
There are pockets of rape culture in America, all in urban areas infested with progressives.
If there is a country with a manifest rape culture it's India.
Fair enough. But tell me, which Version of Relativity Theory do you believe in? The Original or 2.0?
Terrorists only listen to the sound of gunfire. That's the only language they understand.
Western metropolitan men are so effeminate they are weaker than girls. See →Pajama Boy
Rumor has it Jesus didn't even pilgrim to Mecca. What a bad prophet of islam!
Blocking is still better, because there are trolls can't be stopped another way. And there are really nasty trolls here.
I told you before there isn't more than one form of Christianity. Because there is only one Bible and 2 + 2 is always 4 (except for progressives in which case the answer is 5). So your question isn't valid in the first place.
You asked a cynical rhetorical question equating to "and what do you pick from Christianity". You did that with the intent of upsetting me. So don't indulge in projection, it's still you who is the troll.
So denial makes me a child? That accusation is rather ironic.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Please feel free to indicate how I have demonstrated "trolling".
The definitions you cited define exactly your behavior. It's exactly what you do. You are not interested in a debate, you just target people who are not in the Church of Progressivism and try to "sow[s] discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion." (from your Wikipedia citation).
So back off already and troll someone else.
First, I am quite clearly not a troll, if you actually understand what a troll is.
Third, I have not been dishonest in any way.
You deny just everything like a five-year-old. That's certainly very grown-up.
Second, you do not know what my political ideology is, at all.
You are perpetually revealing it. It's plain to see.
What you seem to be saying, and correct me if I am wrong, is that you will "debate" with people that share your opinions, and you will insult those that don't.
Wrong again. There is really no point in going further. You live on another planet.
You dare to try to teach me about a matter you have not even the slightest hint of a clue about, you ask cynical questions whether I make up my own values and deny this is a straw man argument, and then you have the nerve to ask why I am insulting you. That can only come from someone of your ilk.
I am here do have a debate with honest people, not to quibble with far left-wing trolls who are hardly able to keep coherence between sentences.
No it wasn't. I agree I should have made a new paragraph, so anyone with a limited mental capacity wouldn't make a mess of it.
As the sender of the message, it is your responsibility to make sure that you convey it properly, otherwise receivers of said message only have the words that you have used to go by.
Yeah, I should have thought about the different mental capabilities, since you seem not to be the sharpest knife in the drawer.
Of course you are saying this because for the likes of you there are neither rhetorical questions nor straw man arguments, as long as they're coming from you.
Is there physics that only works on you? Are there laws that are only for some part of the people? The whole question is complete nonsense and doesn't serve anything than as a straw man. And we can be discussing this in a year from now and it won't change anything.
Again, "every single time" specifies the entirety of time.
Wrong again. "Every single time" asks for a condition, because otherwise it would be eternity which doesn't make sense to someone with a sane mind.
Your rhetorical question was exactly a straw man. Why would you come up with such a silly question otherwise?
That's asked a lot from this kind of people. They discuss mostly to stir things up.
Yeah, these Christians are really nasty.
Islam is only responsible for 25500 terrorist attacks since 9/11. That's almost nothing compared to Christianity.
