CreateDebate


Winklepicker's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Winklepicker's arguments, looking across every debate.

Feigning a tantrum when asked to show the colour of his money.

A very weak and unconvincing diversionary tactic.

Actually I thought that the pirarah had reported me and Andy had deleted my, ''colourful'' replies to the filth.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

So much for open debate and consideration of other people's views.

But, as you say, when such people are allowed to infest a debate forum like this it loses it's entertainment value and becomes a much less attractive way to spend an hour or so exchanging views.

This deranged person spends most of his time making lewd remarks and being gratuitously rude and generally makes participating in CreateDebate an altogether unpleasant experience.

But then, that's exactly what his intention.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

So much for open debate and consideration of other people's views.

But, as you say, when such people are allowed to infest a debate forum like this it loses it's entertainment value and becomes a much less attractive way to spend an hour or so exchanging views.

This deranged person spends most of his time making lewd remarks and being gratuitously rude and generally makes participating in CreateDebate an altogether unpleasant experience.

But then, that's exactly what his intention.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

Careful what you say there SS or the piraha will run off and tell his mum that you're being 'beastly' to him.

Such is the intolerance of the bully when the tables are turned on them.

Look, you're very wrong here and this your ignorance along with your lack of intellect and maturity was graphically illustrated when you banned almost everyone, including me on a recent, juvenile thread you posted has meant that you have downgraded yourself to the 'bottom of the class'.

Instead of standing your ground and fighting your corner like a man you ''ran crying to mummy'' and told her that the 'big bad boys' were calling you names.

This childish action combined with the spewing out with your ridiculous 'conspiracy theory', drivel along you callous comment''Charlie Hebdo was nothing'' has, as far as I'm concerned, rendered you a pariah and someone with whom I want no contact.

Your, understandable conspiracy theory is nevertheless just that, a theory.

I feel that by expressing your theory you have accredited our politicians with more sense than they really deserve.

Their open door policy of, ''come on on on on in, there's plenty of standing room on top'' has dramatically backfired and their now trying to pass laws to make it a custodial offense to point out the threat which they, and they alone, ( the politicians, past and present) have brought upon the populations which they were entrusted to protect.

No Islamic terrorists?

Tell that to the employees and loved ones of Charlie Hebdo, the 130 victims and their grieving relations and loved ones of the Paris nightclub shooting and the 186 men women and children who were mowed down by an Islamic terrorist in Nice, France.

That's not to mention the 9/11 and London's 7/7 atrocities along with the countless acts of Muslim barbaric terrorism throughout the western world.

Until people realise that we're in the clutches of an extensive network of Muslim terrorist cells as a result of the romantic notions and shortsighted stupidity of our politicians all the people of the west will have to endure the endless stream of deadly Islamic terrorism.

A problem cannot even be addressed, never mind resolved if we don't recognise it's true nature.

''To begin at the beginning'' we must realize it's the politicians that need to be replaced.

You will note that, relatively speaking, China, Russia and Japan, to mention a few, don't suffer from ''The Muslim Disease'' to anywhere near the same extent, if at all, as the poorly and weakly governed nations of the west.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

What about the L.G.B.T.s?

................................................................................................

Well, I didn't mean exclusively Russia, but Russia included.

Many years ago, the mid 1970s, one of my ex-employees went to work in Riyadh Saudi Arabia and explained the harsh and repressive Muslim regime which existed there.

He was the first person to enlighten me to the barbarity of Sharia law and the Islamic intolerance to western values and customs.

That was over 40 years ago and nothing has changed, except their presence in the west has increased manifold and throughout many cities in Europe they're trying, successfully, to establish and enforce their Sharia laws.

That I can understand.

But what I cannot comprehend is the way most liberal politicians in the west are aiding and abetting them in achieving their goal of the Islamization of the west.

You couldn't make it up.

He started off as a pacifist, then turned to terrorism to achieve his political goals.

Mandela should be viewed without rose coloured glasses and recognised for the murderous terrorist he was.

He signed off on the murder of innocent people, lots of them.

At his trial he pleaded guilty to well over 100 acts of public violence including mobilizing terrorist bombing campaigns, which planted bombs in public places such as Johannesburg railway station killing and maiming many.

Mandala's M.K. terrorists killed many innocent women and children.

He could have achieved is aspirations peacefully, which is what he did eventually.

His eventual triumph was greatly marred by his callous disregard for the lives of his fellow countrymen and women.

He never, like all terrorists, including the the so called Irish Republican Army, renounced violence.

If you've never had to live through the absolute nightmare of a bloody and indiscriminate terrorist campaign it would be easy to perceive such a conscienceless psychopathic killer as some sort of romantic liberator.

If, however, you had lived through 30 long years of daily terrorist atrocities in Northern Ireland as I did, I can assure that your perception of Mandela type ''liberators'' would very quickly change.

Mandela with his M.K. terrorists and the I.R.A., are no different than the terrorists of I.S.I.S.

How did you guys feel after the 'Twin Towers. atrocity?

Did you consider that such a barbaric act was carried out by 'liberators'?

I would think most Americans would not.

Once you condone the achievement of political aims through the armalite and not the ballot box than you've given a new generation of terrorists justification for their murderous activities, maybe the murders of your family and loved ones.

He started off as a pacifist, then turned to terrorism to achieve his political goals.

Mandela should be viewed without rose coloured glasses and recognised for the murderous terrorist he was.

He signed off on the murder of innocent people, lots of them.

At his trial he pleaded guilty to well over 100 acts of public violence including mobilizing terrorist bombing campaigns, which planted bombs in public places such as Johannesburg railway station killing and maiming many.

Mandala's M.K. terrorists killed many innocent women and children.

He could have achieved is aspirations peacefully, which is what he did eventually.

His eventual triumph was greatly marred by his callous disregard for the lives of his fellow countrymen and women.

He never, like all terrorists, including the the so called Irish Republican Army, renounced violence.

If you've never had to live through the absolute nightmare of a bloody and indiscriminate terrorist campaign it would be easy to perceive such a conscienceless psychopathic killer as some sort of romantic liberator.

If, however, you had lived through 30 long years of daily terrorist atrocities in Northern Ireland as I did, I can assure that your perception of Mandela type ''liberators'' would very quickly change.

Mandela with his M.K. terrorists and the I.R.A., are no different than the terrorists of I.S.I.S.

How did you guys feel after the 'Twin Towers. atrocity?

Did you consider that such a barbaric act was carried out by 'liberators'?

I would think most Americans would not.

Once you condone the achievement of political aims through the armalite and not the ballot box than you've given a new generation of terrorists justification for their murderous activities, maybe the murders of your family and loved ones.

He started off as a pacifist, then turned to terrorism to achieve his political goals.

Mandela should be viewed without rose coloured glasses and recognised for the murderous terrorist he was.

He signed off on the murder of innocent people, lots of them.

At his trial he pleaded guilty to well over 100 acts of public violence including mobilizing terrorist bombing campaigns, which planted bombs in public places such as Johannesburg railway station killing and maiming many.

Mandala's M.K. terrorists killed many innocent women and children.

He could have achieved is aspirations peacefully, which is what he did eventually.

His eventual triumph was greatly marred by his callous disregard for the lives of his fellow countrymen and women.

He never, like all terrorists, including the the so called Irish Republican Army, renounced violence.

If you've never had to live through the absolute nightmare of a bloody and indiscriminate terrorist campaign it would be easy to perceive such a conscienceless psychopathic killer as some sort of romantic liberator.

If, however, you had lived through 30 long years of daily terrorist atrocities in Northern Ireland as I did, I can assure that your perception of Mandela type ''liberators'' would very quickly change.

Mandela with his M.K. terrorists and the I.R.A., are no different than the terrorists of I.S.I.S.

How did you guys feel after the 'Twin Towers. atrocity?

Did you consider that such a barbaric act was carried out by 'liberators'?

I would think most Americans would not.

Once you condone the achievement of political aims through the armalite and not the ballot box than you've given a new generation of terrorists justification for their murderous activities, maybe the murders of your family and loved ones.

Whatever gets you through the night, or the day for that matter.

Except in Russia.

In Russia it's a custodial offence to engage in gay sexual activities. There's a ten year waiting list to get into their prisons.

Live and let live, that's my motto.

The ecstasy of this momentous occasion would best be experienced within, and to enhance a loving relationship.

But if one has difficulty forming a meaningful and romantic relationship then I suppose there is nothing at all wrong in paying some poor soul whose profession helps to pay for probable drug addiction along with her pimp's grand lifestyle.

Muslims represent a real and deadly threat to all the people of the western world and due to their actions have lost the right to enjoy the same freedoms as the non Muslim citizens of the countries they infest.

They have already 'appropriated' great tracts of our towns and cities where they practice and enforce their barbaric sharia laws of their backward religious hocus pocus.

Jews are an asset to the societies they live and never did pose a threat to Germany or any country which they adopted as home.

Where do Muslims hold mass protests against the death and violence of their religious brothers?

Even when the so called Irish Republican Army were murdering 100s of people and destroying property in Northern Ireland we had brave people like Mairead Corrigan and Betty Williams risking being ''knee capped between the ears'' by holding peace rallies which were attended by 100s of 1000s.

Not so with the Muslims whose first loyalty is for the paedophile prophet Mohammad.

Those who don't recognise the Muslim threat will be blown out of the surreal world of cloud cuckoo land sooner or later.

The sanctimonious shitheads who advocate tolerance to the ''enemy within'' will be instrumental in the dismantling of their own societies along with the demise of their values and principles.

It is time for these so called peaceful Muslims to stand up and be counted.

What's a dickhead like you you answering such a question for? You wouldn't know the difference between shit and butter.

Do you in your wildest dreams think that a intellectual neanderthal such as you can sit in judgment of America's human rights policies?

Wise up, grow up and shut the fuck up.

Recognise the stark truth that you are a prime example of the average cyber phony who never achieved anything in real life and tries to boost their, well deserved, low self esteem by spewing out embarrassing drivel on rebating forums as this.

Glad to note that you recognise this fact.

...........................................................

Yes, I think they should both get divorced from their respective spouses, then run away together and live in total obscurity in some remote part of the world.

We could all breathe a sigh of relief as peace and tranquility settled over the political scene for a while.

This battle will rage indefinitely, with recounts of the recounts of the recounts and trying to identify the ''millions'' of illegal voters.

Well, anyone sufficiently clever to become a billionaire in the 'cut and thrust' world of business must be clever, tenacious and possess an ability for sound judgment.

Everyone has strengths and weaknesses, but unlike many he has the prudence to recognize his weak areas, such as employing the professional services of chartered accountants specializing in compiling, legal but 'canny' tax returns.

Given the opportunity Trump's sanctimonious critics would of course avoid paying tax on part or all of their earnings.

Due to his business acumen and lack of preconceived notions of political correctness Trump will have the blinkers on and go for his goals in a single minded and determined manner.

I feel he will reward workers, enterprising entrepreneurs, innovation and professional excellence.

The parasites, the criminals and the hangers-on can expect a hard time from ''Captain America'', Donald Trump.

Will he be a great President? He'll certainly be a different President with the potential of being great.

After Obama's inertia his energy and radical proposals will be like a breath of fresh air, as fresh as the morning dew.

Cometh the hour, cometh the man.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

Now you're being completely stupid.

Were you abused as a child?

Was your abuser a close relative?

Is the reason for your retarded mental and reasoning capacity due to you contracting one of the more severe, brain damaging social diseases during this time?

I'll know to give your juvenile debates a wide birth in future.

You are a freak.

There will be a few billion people made up of Chinese, Muslims, those of other religions and atheists all being tortured in hell for eternity.

Sort of unfair don't you think?

Ah well, that's life, or in this case, death'

Hallelujah brother, hallelujah.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

No, not as narrow as that.

My description of a significant contributory element of conflict in Northern Ireland was offered only as an example of how repression of ''absolute'' free speech, even limited repression, can and will lead lead to mistrust, fear and eventually hate.

This principle could be applied to almost every area of global conflict.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
3 points

Well, even though I don't feel inclined to ''backup''! my genuinely held opinion I will do so.

I live in Northern Ireland and experienced 30 plus years of bloody and deadly sectarian violence when the distrust and ignorance of the two traditions as well as the religious beliefs of the two polarized communities evolved into hatred then escalated into murder and eventually into what was really a full blown ans bloody civil war the full horrors of which were only averted by the professionalism, outstanding bravery and even handedness of the army and the dedicated police officers of the Royal Ulster Constabulary.

One of the major contributing factors to the continuing conflict,( albeit on a significantly reduced scale) is the insistence of the Roman Catholic Church that no education integration between catholic and protestants pupils should be allowed.

This in itself means that the two traditions never merge and discover that, to their surprise they have a lot in common, such as maybe they support the same football team etc.

When laws were passed forbidding the full, unrestrained ''freedom of speech'' dialogue between the opposing politicians broke down and the ensuing political void was filled by the paramilitaries.

The people of Northern Ireland were then forced to endure three decades of hell on earth, partly funded by American I.R.A, sympathizers , ( Noraid).

If the warring tribes had been able, and indeed encouraged to OPENLY, ''jaw jaw'' instead of ''war war'' then I'm certain that the deaths and eye-watering destruction of property and countless jobs could have been averted.

If the ignorance induced bitterness of both sides could have been expressed in a full, no holes barred series of ''heated debates'' ( there's an understatement) I'm certain that most, if not all the bloodshed could have been avoided.

When free speech is suppressed emotions and suspicions build up, just like a pressure cooker, and eventually the whole artificially created peaceful veneer explodes into bloody violence.

I am of the opinion that restrictions on freedom of speech causes more problems than it prevents.

Some people can abuse absolute freedom of speech to incite hatred and violence, but even so, the basic right to state your heartfelt opinion on any issue including racial, sexual or religious prejudices should not be muzzled by repressive laws.

The ''suppression of expression'' only serves to fester prejudiced views and stifles open discussion which can often dispel many misguided beliefs and unfounded fears.

Laws cannot change 'hearts and minds', only open, civilised and candid discussion can identify the true feelings of a nation's people and when rational debate is entered into by reasonable, well meaning people it's usually the case that a harmonious compromise can be achieved thus leading to a better and more peaceful society in which we all feel comfortable with each other.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

Do you think maybe he took a wrong turning and became disorientated?

If the British tourist had survived the incident do you think he would have been charged with presenting himself as a target, walking around with lead which didn't belong to him and bleeding all over the sidewalk?


1 of 45 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]