Got to the end finally. There's nowhere that Trump praises the invasion of Ukraine or acts like it's a good thing. He simply uses the logic that it is "savy" to wait until the left is in power and then pretend like you are there to help Ukraine knowing the left and NATO are stupid enough to fall for the shit. None of your logic helps Democrats. Objective, moderate people see what is clear and obvious. Putin invaded nothing when Trump was in power. He took whatever he wanted when Democrats were in power. Probably why the Democratic Party's poll numbers are the lowest I've seen in my lifetime as people bail from the party like rats from a sinking ship.
Now for the middle. Trump never praises the invasion of Ukraine. What he does do is mock the left for being stupid enough to fall for Putin's tricks. Declare Ukraine independent, walk in acting like you're there to help, and never leave. He knows the left are too weak and stupid to prevent him from doing what he wants. Probably why he waited until Trump was out of office to invade. If the left's narrative were true, Putin would have walked in untouched while Trump was in office, but no, he waited until Biden was in office, and we both know exactly why. He feared Trump. He didn't fear the American left.
I'll dissect the video into parts:
I love how in the beginning of the video the leftist activist posing as a comedian mocks sitting far away while we all know that the left mocks people for sitting close during a pandemic. Nice self own. If this is comedy today, Heorge Carlin is spinning in his grave. That was hard to watch as you can hear slight, hesitant fake laughter when prompted.
and the Nazis were very much in favour of capitalism.
Not according to him, nor according to Hitler. Quote a link source that can be edited by anybody at any time according to itself again so I can laugh at you.
The fact that German anti-Semitism and anticapitalism spring from the same root is of great importance for the understanding of what has happened there, but this is rarely grasped by foreign observers.
-"The Road to Serfdom" (Written in 1944)
••••••
Wikipedia according to Wikipedia-
This page in a nutshell: Do not use a Wikipedia article as a source for another Wikipedia article, even when describing Wikipedia.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. Biographies of living persons, subjects that happen to be in the news, and politically or culturally contentious topics are especially vulnerable to these issues. Edits on Wikipedia that are in error may eventually be fixed. However, because Wikipedia is a volunteer-run project, it cannot monitor every contribution all the time. There are many errors that remain unnoticed for days, weeks, months, or even years. Therefore, Wikipedia should not be considered a definitive source.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Wikipedia according to Wikipedia-
This page in a nutshell: Do not use a Wikipedia article as a source for another Wikipedia article, even when describing Wikipedia.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. Biographies of living persons, subjects that happen to be in the news, and politically or culturally contentious topics are especially vulnerable to these issues. Edits on Wikipedia that are in error may eventually be fixed. However, because Wikipedia is a volunteer-run project, it cannot monitor every contribution all the time. There are many errors that remain unnoticed for days, weeks, months, or even years. Therefore, Wikipedia should not be considered a definitive source.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/
It is true, of course, that in Germany before 1933, and in Italy before 1922, communists and Nazis or Fascists clashed more frequently with each other than with other parties. They competed for the support of the same type of mind and reserved for each other the hatred of the heretic. But their practice showed how closely they are related. To both, the real enemy, the man with whom they had nothing in common and whom they could not hope to convince, is the liberal of the old type. While to the Nazi the communist, and to the communist the Nazi, and to both the socialist, are potential recruits who are made of the right timber, although they have listened to false prophets, they both know that there can be no compromise between them and those who really believe in individual freedom.
-The Road to Serfdom(Written in 1944)
The Nazis were on the far right. Right is the opposite of left. Normal people learn that by the time they are five.
Not according to books written at the time, prior to the recent left wing revisionism of history.
The fact that German anti-Semitism and anticapitalism spring from the same root is of great importance for the understanding of what has happened there, but this is rarely grasped by foreign observers.
-"The Road to Serfdom" (Written in 1944)
Why do you always label your lies, "according to Democrats"?
Because the most prominent Democrat literally said that.
Hillary Clinton questioning the legitimacy of the 2016 election is a direct threat to our democracy
Oh wait... I think I know.
Seeing you are really slow and don't catch on very quickly, I highly doubt it.
Say what now?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ 2020/04/14/president-trump-made-18000-false-or-misleading-claims-1170-days/
The washingtonpost is the fakest of fake news, lies about Trump lying, and had to drop its last 5,000,000 anti Trump narratives that were proven to be trash.
A Tennessee lawmaker has introduced an amendment to a resolution that would recognize CNN and the Washington Post “as fake news” that is “part of the media wing of the Democratic party”.
The amendment read: “We recognize that fake news outlets suggest ideas without directly making accusations so that they can claim innocence from their ivory towers.”
I'd accuse her of toxic femininity, then ask her why she hates men, then turn to the men in the audience and say look, she hates half the country. She must be a bigot who wants all of you menvto fail in life. Use their own childish tactics against them.
Black people can do nothing if qualified officers who have sworn to uphold the law
The left claims they do neither and are racists targeting minorities and killing them in cold blood.
decide to start murdering people in cold blood, no
They can if they shoot back and have the police outnumbered or are a good shot. You are very unintelligent burrito.
If you do not plan to threaten the police with a gun then can you explain why you have opened a "debate" informing people they are "idiots" for being unarmed when they talk to the police?
I plan on shooting police that I saw just shoot an unarmed black man. Good thing I was armed.
When you arm yourself you give police exactly the excuse they need to use excessive force to contain you.
I'll state what is obvious to us common sense types. Police can plant a gun on you as the excuse they need.
Your implication that the best way to deal with police is to shoot them or threaten them with a gun
No one mentioned threatening the police with a gun. The gun is for you to protect yourself from police who threaten your life with a gun.
qualifies you as the type of idiot which is seen probably only once every thirty or forty years on this planet.
I get it now. If the police pin a black man down, beat him half to death, plant a gun on him, and shoot him dead, your logic is to take it like an unarmed man should and shut the fuck up. You're a damned genius. You'd make a perfect Nazi.
Even UK media have attacked it, so your American humor comment is null and void.
