This happened just the other day with no blind predictions needed.
the Dems are outraising them 2 to 1.. That doesn't bode well.
Democrats usually out fundraise Republicans. You're down in the polls there genius.
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/
Are you completely stupid?
You're gay dude. Tell us about your gayness.
You did not mention the judgement of God, the wrath of the Lamb, the 7 plagues, the 4 horsemen of the apocalypse, blood up to waists.
https://www.cgg.org/index.
This is typical for billionaire business owners.
I say we give kids more homework, and not allow them to have phones until they reach a fair amount of brain development.
THE FACTS: Obama did not have a separation policy.
He still seperated families at the border and used cages.
The Trump administration didn’t, explicitly, either, but that was the effect of zero tolerance, which meant that anyone caught crossing the border illegally was to be criminally prosecuted, even if they had few or no previous offenses.
In other words, Obama did it, he just did it without a zero tolerance policy (probably because the law infers a zero tolerance policy by the nature of being a law), but he still did it.
The policy meant adults were taken to court for criminal proceedings and their children were separated. In most cases, if the charge took longer than 72 hours to process, which is the longest time that children can be held by Customs and Border Protection, children were sent into the care of the Health and Human Services Department.
Democrats have declared that seperating children from parents is immoral, and your own statement admits that Obama's administration did exactly that.
Yes.. You quoted the word "IF"
Families were seperated and held in cages during the Obama administration, yes or no?
Tear gas was used on illegals at the border during Obama's Presidency, yes or no?
Donald Trump has deported people at a lower rate than Obama did, yes or no?
https://www.cato.org/blog/
https://www.axios.com/
It's even more stupid when you consider the fact that I have no idea what Mussolini said because unlike the dickhead who opened the topic I don't sit up all night jerking off to his speeches.
Think about how stupid you must be to call people fascists while not knowing that the creator of Fascism didn't say right wing things, but rather said left wing things.
Do I agree with Mussolini when he said: "We are at WAR with socialism"?
Conveniently no link.
I copied and pasted the words "Mussolini we are at war with socialism". Nothing came up.
How'd cities just a few thousand years ago wind up under water? Manmade climate change or just climate change?
So what's the answer? How'd cities just a few thousand years ago wind up under water? Manmade climate change or just climate change?
Reading helps.. If you want a fair debate, learn to READ WHAT THE FUCK I WROTE!!
You:
"The fact remains.. If Trump DIDN'T do such rotten shit, you wouldn't HAVE to point to Obama to excuse it."
You:
"I'm sorry.. Even IF Obama did all that shit, he's NOT in power.. "
And I will continue to point out that you didn't think it was wicked shit when the President was Obama. You thought it was shit to be overlooked and ignored, and probably for the same reason Trump supporters are ignoring it now.
The fact remains.. If Trump DIDN'T do such rotten shit, you wouldn't HAVE to point to Obama to excuse it..
In other words Obama did rotten shit, which is true. If Trump had Obama's record, libs would have burned down the Whitehouse already.
Maybe Trump can create his own versions of Benghazi, Syria, Libya, and ISIS to bail you out.
Nahhh... I don't have time or the inclination to CONDEMN every nasty thing anybody ever did. That's why I made a BLANKET condemnation of all that shit.. I guess you missed it..
But you found time to condemn Trump for less.
Should The Innocent Victims Of Bronto's Sexual Crimes Be Granted Anonymity?
I'd like to hear more about the sex crimes.
Zealots make conclusions then look for evidence to support them.
Like a dystopian world vision where there is no ownership of property and everyone acts like mindless zombies who are programmed to not say trigger words and refer to people by their preffered gender pronoun, and are subject to a beautiful, allmighty, honest government that will kill you if you dissent or don't like their wait in line for a month for rationed healthcare system.
Or the vision that Muslims will ignore the Quran and not try to intentionally overpower the civilizations they move into and force them into conversion.
No Minty, I am not getting this from an MMA fight. I am getting this from 40 years of observation.
You aren't 40 years old. You are lying yet again.
List of Nom dupe accounts
ColonelFry
BurritoLunch
Carterusmbot
HighFalutin
TheCreator
BobBarker
Hootie
Quantumhead
Warjin
TheSnake
Ramshutu
Nomenclature
NumberOne
TheDevil
List of Nom dupe accounts
ColonelFry
BurritoLunch
Carterusmbot
HighFalutin
TheCreator
BobBarker
Hootie
Quantumhead
Warjin
TheSnake
Ramshutu
Nomenclature
NumberOne
TheDevil
Nom Adolf Hitler likes to attack Jews per square stache tactics, and it is hard to watch.
Hey look. It's your link rearing its ugly head once again...
Adolf Hitler and other proponents denied that Nazism was either left-wing or right-wing, instead they officially portrayed Nazism as a syncretic movement.[16][17] In Mein Kampf, Hitler directly attacked both left-wing and right-wing politics in Germany, saying:
Today our left-wing politicians in particular are constantly insisting that their craven-hearted and obsequious foreign policy necessarily results from the disarmament of Germany, whereas the truth is that this is the policy of traitors ... But the politicians of the Right deserve exactly the same reproach. It was through their miserable cowardice that those ruffians of Jews who came into power in 1918 were able to rob the nation of its arms.[18]
In a speech given in Munich on 12 April 1922, Hitler stated that:
There are only two possibilities in Germany; do not imagine that the people will forever go with the middle party, the party of compromises; one day it will turn to those who have most consistently foretold the coming ruin and have sought to dissociate themselves from it. And that party is either the Left: and then God help us! for it will lead us to complete destruction - to Bolshevism, or else it is a party of the Right which at the last, when the people is in utter despair, when it has lost all its spirit and has no longer any faith in anything, is determined for its part ruthlessly to seize the reins of power - that is the beginning of resistance of which I spoke a few minutes ago.[19]
When asked[when?] whether he supported the "bourgeois right-wing", Hitler claimed that Nazism was not exclusively for any class and he indicated that it favoured neither the left nor the right, but preserved "pure" elements from both "camps" by stating: "From the camp of bourgeois tradition, it takes national resolve, and from the materialism of the Marxist dogma, living, creative Socialism".[20]
Yeah, obviously the fact that Wikipedia hosts quotes from Joseph Goebbels evidences that it is a communist propaganda master. My apologies for being slow on this issue.
I'll slow it down for you. Goebbels the Communist. Hitler's right hand man. Emphasis on Communist.
Yes, because it evidences my point
Providing a link refuting your claim is the opposite of evidincing your point.
Ahahahaha! Wikipedia is a "Communist propaganda master" now, is it? Lol. That's nice. Did you read that on Pizzagate News?
Pretty slow, aren't you Nom?
https://en.m.wikiquote.org/wiki/JosephGoebbels
-
Oh no Bronto. I would never doubt the word of a Nazi. Who would even contemplate such a foolish venture? Lol.
But you would provide a link saying Nazism was a syncretic movement, then claim it wasn't.
Ahahahaha! Epic lie alarm. The links SHOWED he CLAIMED to be neither wing. In typical Nazi fashion, you swapped these two verbs around in order to deliberately misrepresent the facts.
See above. Syncretic movement. Your link. Your source.
Nom's link-
It doesn't matter. Your "Nazism is right wing" narrative is dead
Facts do not die Bronto, much to the chagrin of Nazis like yourself.
Yes. We've read what he and his Communist propaganda master had to say. We've also watched you try to deny what all Nazis say was true, even after the war.
Explain to us why a far right winger would have an open Communist as his right hand man and an SS and SA infested with Communists.
Then explain why the far right wingers allied with the USSR to invade Poland.
Doesn't that make you a liar?
Discrediting your propaganda that the Nazis were left wing does not make me a liar, no.
You yourself claimed the links showed him to be neither wing. Sorry. Too late to take it back.
I also haven't forgotten the "Nazism is a syncretic movement" link you provided us. You're probably sorry you used that link.
I really hate liars. All you do is lie
Awesome buddy.
You don't like your own tactics Adolf?
You lie more than Hitler.
Yeah, it's because I'm on the left wing. Just like Hitler bro. Lol.
See above.
It doesn't matter. Your "Nazism is right wing" narrative is dead. Doesn't that make you a liar? I really hate liars. All you do is lie. You lie more than Hitler.
We might have called ourselves the Liberal Party. We chose to call ourselves the National Socialists.
Interview with George Sylvester Viereck, 1923
Go for it Nom. Make an attempt.
I never made any claim. I simply debunked your right wing myth. Understand dipshit?
Your link is the Guardian. I pointed out its liberal propaganda bias. Struggling to put sentences and thoughts together I see.
We might have called ourselves the Liberal Party. We chose to call ourselves the National Socialists.
Interview with George Sylvester Viereck, 1923
The Guardian. The Guardian is a British daily newspaper. ... The newspaper's reputation as a platform for liberal and left-wing editorial has led to the use of the "Guardian reader" and "Guardianista" as often (but not always) pejorative epithets for those of left-leaning or politically correct tendencies.
Founded: 5 May 1821; 197 years ago (as The Manchester Guardian, renamed The Guardian
Sister newspapers: The Observer; The Guardian Weekly
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia › wiki › The_Guardian
The Guardian - Wikipedia
Der Fuehrer, Hitler’s Rise to Power (1944)
The bourgeois, even the Nationalist Press, began to take fright and talk of Bolshevism and Hitler himself boasted: ‘In our movement the two extremes come together: the Communists from the Left and the officers and students from the Right. These two have always been the most active elements, and it was the greatest crime that they used to oppose each other in street fights.’… Our party has already succeeded in uniting these two utter extremes within the ranks of our storm troops. They will form the core of the great German liberation movement, in which all without distinction will stand together when the day comes to say: The Nation arises, the storm is breaking!’
p. 122
-
Röhm coined the slogan that there must be ‘second revolution’, this time, not against the Left, but against the Right; in his diary Goebbels agreed with him. On April 18 he maintained that this second revolution was being discussed ‘everywhere among the people’; in reality, he said, this only meant that first one was not yet ended. ‘Now we shall soon have to settle with the reaction. The revolution must nowhere call a halt.
p. 467
-
The twenty-six-year-old Baldur von Schirach, leader of the Hitler youth, who could boast of standing close to Hitler, declared bluntly in those revolutionary June weeks: ‘A socialist and anti-capitalist attitude is the most salient characteristic of the Young National Socialist Germany.’
p. 501
You still haven't tried to explain the quotes. That's a retreat. Jolly good.
You still haven't rebuttled with any explanation. Maybe you'll get to it later.
Hitler: A Biography (1936)
At length a force of three million S.A. men was pushing on behind him [Röhm], and God knew whither they were pushing. There were large numbers of Communists and Social Democrats among them; many of the storm troopers were called ‘beefsteaks—brown and red within.
p. 390
A History of National Socialism (1934)
The Nazi party had been too hasty in incorporating the word ‘Socialist’ in its title, Hitler indeed wished it to be ‘Social Revolutionary.’ p. 85
Hitler expressed it in a form which made it intelligible to the masses. ‘We do not want any other god than Germany itself. It is essential to have fanatical faith and hope and love in and for Germany.’ p. 100
I'm not bronto. You are Nom though.
The source was provided.
William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany
Deflecting and not responding will not help you here. It helps me. I'm just fine with your non response.
It looks like Excon's version of freedom of the press is Jim Acosta acts like an insane child while a Fox News host is attacked.
