At this point the whole story with the porn star seems to be a "sore loser" move from the left, unless they arrive to present the story in such a way that it would dissuade the "ultra christian" faction inside the republican party to not vote for Trump again, but I sincerely doubt it.
Good question ! I'm not really sure, but if I had to bet I'd say there arent going to be any black riots, probably just the usual anti police/ extreme left morons
But still, shooting a guy because he had his pants down and refused to obey an order? I dunno how is the training of the american police but there seems to be too many screw upps that could have been easily avoided
Many things could have been done to save the Titanic: if the captain had ordered to ram the iceberg head on instead of trying to avoid it only two compartments would have been breached and the Titanic could have continued its journey safely
(But still admire the irony: it was sad at the time that not even God could sink that shi^p, and yet it sunk because of freakin icecube!!! ;)
Well in wester culture not showing your face has always been suspicious, I would not believe or trust someone who doesnt show his face to me, and nowadays it is even more suspicious since it allows you to hide your face from security cameras
So yes! Banning burkas is a good idea! (its already been done in France and other european countries)
Its against the rules to make debates wich are not in the form of a question, as it is against the rules to personnally attack people. Do you want to know why? Its is to avoid utterly stupid and pointless debates such as this one.
"Andy doesn't know the difference between science and religion"
As debators what do you expect us to do when we see the title of such a "debate"? There is no debate to be had, you are just throwing out your opinions without backing them upp without any kind of evidence. A user of this website once compared people who do such things as "monkeys who throw shit at each other" , the image is stricking and fits perfectly
Here is a usefull link on how to debate, please read it:
Dunno what debate youre talking about, but maybe its because you were not following the rules he specified? This debate doesnt follow the rules either btw:
-1. All debates must be written in the form of a question. If you do not, I will take the liberty to change those which I see are statements into questions.
-3. No attacks on members. You may post debates and arguments that attack public figures, but you may not post a debate or argument attacking another member. Do it once and you will be warned. Do it twice and you will be banned.
Go read the rules and have a nice day
I'm not sure its the republican party as a whole who is against abortion but rather the christian part of it. But nonetheless I think you are right some christians are real hipocrytes (spelling?) on the question of abortion; publicly they are against it but when no one is looking they dishonor their faith
The problem with that reasoning is that the fetus didnt just pop out of nowhere like some kind of virus, it was due to consensual hanky panky stuff (rape cases etc put aside of course) If you cant assume the consequences of an action, just dont do it!
And even after birth the baby is reliable on its mother for sustenance
A) I have two younger sisters Charlotte and Noémie, dunno if that was what you meant ^^
B) I taught basic english and latin to kids, and advanced french to adults
C) I gave blood a year and a half ago, and apparently my blood has an unusual quantity of platelets so every 3 or 4 months they call me to give blood and offer me a meal
G) In highschool I made a story telling group, I couldnt read books to them because since it was a catholic school I would have had every book to be approved by the school and it would have taken an eternity to get the group going
I) I am on the administration council, most of my job consists of stopping the pseudo communist group
