CreateDebate


Einhander's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Einhander's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

we need to completely map and understands what each strand represents before doing any of that.

i agree that prudence is required ( but it's definitely yes in the long run )

1 point

yes, it's a legal contract between two people to a common purpose. totally voluntary of course.

1 point

interesting.

what's the difference between abortions and killing? they're both justifiable when necessary.

suppose you're right that every woman who does abortions are slutty Why don't you adopt their children? or at least pay for their education until college? since you hold life so sacred, isn't that the best solution?

or are you only interested in making someone keep their baby against their will? no matter the circumstances?

let's face it... you don't have compassion for sluts, nor for murdering babies

1 point

no

what needs to be done is to educate people and create awareness on what they're eating

businesses will always supply something people wants. If people wants something else that's healthier, businesses will be motivated to supply that instead.

0 points

yet we scientific improvement every day whenever we buy phones, ride cars, make comments on this website. We cannot observe GOD in such a way

4 points

you need to read up on evolution AND creationism first, before making a comment like that.

creationism is so silly that it's blatantly transparent and fake to any intelligent person out there

1 point

it doesn't matter

but it may be beneficial to their future social life in christian communities ( if christianity still exists by the time they grew up )

5 points

faith is: belief despite lack of proof

atheism is the position of NOT believing god/s exist

atheism is the position of rejecting claims that god/s exist, due to a lack of evidence

2 points

no supernatural beings are ever proven to exist

not god

nor demon

1 point

it is a cultural treasure that should be introduced to the next generation.

it is as beneficial as sport

it builds character the way only very few sports can ( pain teaches you a lot of things )

1 point

they can do that during school hours too.

i will assume that this debate is about primary and high school student, not including college.

the problem with schooling nowadays is that they are using a "one size fits all" method to teach all students uniformly. The problem is that every person is different, with different aptitude and different learning speed.

i argue that if children are taught only things that are engaging to them, it will accellerate the process and absorb much more.

also, with proper aptitude test, students can be placed in classes that caters to their intelligence level and interest.

ex: specialization in social science, with accellerated learning..... or specialization in exact sciences, with normal learning, and so on.

1 point

finish your primary school first. then come back and argue.

try to read something useful, instead of just the bible or quran.

1 point

yes. all literature are treasures to humanity. Except maybe for the scriptures of abrahamic religions

2 points

i think school time should be optimized instead with better learning methods. such as specialization, talent identification and credit systems.

since the goal is to educate, giving homeworks aren't necessarily the best method. Unless of course if the homework is something that the student failed to finish during school hours.

Admitting that school hours aren't enough definitely shows a weakness of the existing education system. Which is more focused on imprisoning educatees until they've absorbed enough learning material due to the lack of any other alternative activities.

1 point

proof that god doesn't exist: i have faith that he did not exist.

1 point

Yes, killing is justifiable. People justify it all the time.

Shoot people in wars >> they are the enemy

Shoot at criminals >> they are dangerous

Abortion:

1. To save the mother's life, if necessary.

2. To improve the society's average human value.

3. To remove a possible drain to its community ( female babies in asian cultures )

There are lots of other examples of children being exploited, removed or suppressed after they are born too. do you wan't them?

As soon as you blamed someone for being slutty, i've totally lost respect for your position. Do not pretend to show compassion for the unborn baby when you don't show any to your fellow humans.

You don't have that right.

1 point

such as? worm holes? antimatters? supernovas?

do you even know what those are?

1 point

Ridiculous. "What if?"

Your opinion that something creates the big bang is totally irrelevant to the fact that Big bang is the best theory out there that explains the origin of the universe SO FAR. And scientists aren't shy about admitting that there IS something that triggers it. Science is fallible, but it's honest. And it's STILL LOOKING FOR THE ORIGIN. Not sitting on its ass like all the religious authority in the world.

Believing that something creates the big bang only will result in another questions "what creates it?"

If your answer is GOD, then you'll need to support your answer with arguments. Otherwise, it's just faith, and you can keep your faith to yourself.

Yes, science and research generates money to the scientists. Yes, science ALWAYS THINKS OUTSIDE THE SQUARE YOU LIVE IN. So my suggestion is to look around more outside your religious studies ( if you have any ) and outside your community ( if you've never been out ).... and only then you can suggest people to think outside the box

Here's an example of something you probably never think about: this website you're writing at is one manifestation of that "findings" you're talking about.

oh... and also the internet, and your electricity, your computer, etc

the atmosphere created the big bang theory << wow.



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]