It would be a better argument if you just stated reasons why abortion does not have detrimental effects on the human body since that is my argument in the first place. Disputing and stating errors on websites would stray far from the topic of the debate.
Source 2 does not over-extend any conclusions. Would you kindly give statement saying such over-extension? We can conclude from the given data since it has been proven through statistics and trends in the research.
As for source 3, you should consider analyzing the argument rather than simply looking for sources since from the statements of the website itself can their points be assessed. Again I am also not responsible for the errors of the websites since I am more focused on the scientific effects of abortion to the body rather than looking for citations.
You have only stated the errors in the sources rather than the arguments present. I am not the one who created the website therefore I am not liable for its errors.
Source 1 has stated numerous side effects and it also has been cited by a physician. "NOTE: Former Surgeon General C. Everett Koop and the Physician’s Ad Hoc Coalition for Truth stated in 1996 that this type of procedure “… is never medically necessary to protect a mother’s health or her future fertility. On the contrary, this procedure can pose a significant threat to both.”
Source: ProtectTexas, Texas Department of Health, 2003
When the child is ready to make his own choices, then he can just simply change his beliefs and leave the religion. Teaching an ideology to a child is`t necessarily forcing it to them but rather a form of introduction.
Children are too young to comprehend such beliefs even if they are taught by their parent. A 3 year old child for an example would find it difficult to comprehend the such concepts thus it would only be a burden to both parties if explained.
Here are some sites that tells about abortion risks.
http://www.midlandlifecenter.org/
I believe that is already part of the system in a religion. As mere individuals in a family we can only do so much as to prevent or assert these influences in our child. Probably when the child gets older then he may dispute such authority from his parents. Children are too young to understand such doctrines anyway and not realize such kind of abuse until they grow of age.
Yes since well give power to a lunatic? What is this world war 2 again?
No since it has causes detrimental risks to the mother and the child. It also has a respectable failure rate causing unplanned deaths.
Wisdom since knowledge is useless unless you know where and when to use it.
I believe sharing is different than forcing. I can share you some food but I can`t force you to eat it, you`ll have to eat it willingly. This analogy may apply to the case presented. I can share to my children my beliefs and if sometime they grow weary of it, then I think it would be alright for them to follow their own.
Yes since being in a religion should be voluntary and being done out of passion for the movement. Being forced however to follow something you don`t even believe is torture in an intellectual sense.
Me too. I prefer dogs since they are easier to train and they`re are`t as cranky as cats. They also make great jog buddies.
I have already disputed your statements before. Therefore you clearly are`t paying attention to what my arguments are about. I was only adding additional scenarios for you to understand how little does gender play in the morality of a person.
Reeeeaaaaallllyyy? So I guess I should never bother to explain to my sons that "no means no?" Any age girl is fair game? And if they get pregnant they should just run off and find someone else ASAP. I'll make sure my daughters never learn that by being irresponsible, she could be robbing her child of a chance to have a decent father and a whole family. It is better to go around tracking down 15 different men for paternity tesets just hoping for some child support.
This statement dose`t even make sense. The topic is about homosexuals being involved in adoption not straight people letting their children be adopted. The moment for an example your child gives your grandchild to the orphanage as per your statement, there is no certainty that your grandchild would have a decent home even with straight people. As for your daughter`s case what if she is`t just ready? Would you rather risk her and her child`s future just to be a family even though they would only end up in poverty?
True. People are only brave enough to make arguments on how wrong that person is but when it comes to doing anything they just don't care.
That`s right. When a women gets murdered people go raging on males when if a male gets murdered almost no body cares. If we want equality then we must care for both sexes.
We are given free will to make our own decisions. He helps us by giving us choices. Therefore he cannot directly help us since he already gave us free will which would contradict his gift.
Obviously you are a narrow minded person. You said it yourself that being educated and straight does`t have to do anything with each other therefore why restrict an educated homosexual to adopt if they are worthy to do so.
Let me make another example that even a person like you can understand. Who would you rather be with in a room, a straight murderer or a homosexual who has good morals? In these times gender is only a small factor in the thinking of man. Nurture plays a bigger role than a nature in the decisions of an individual in our society. Try improving your argument rather than putting stupid and moron in your arguments. You only sound like a sore loser.
Sexuality is only a small factor in teaching ethics. Maturity, educational attainment, experience and the like play a bigger role in teaching ethics. Would you rather have an illiterate straight couple rather than an educated homosexual couple who can provide you what you need?
Students should be able to love learning not fear it. Having a strict teacher only puts stress in students thus making learning a chore rather than a fun experience.
I believe that he also prioritized money rather than inventions. He also tried to ruin Tesla`s hard work with ac just to make him the big man of the light game.
Karl Marx. I believe that his ideologies got out of hand which resulted to countries like North Korea who value very little of life.
Inaccuracies are meant to occur during experiments. It helps us perfect our prototypes.
I referred to the Torah since it was the one that contains the Genesis, the book where the moderator was referring to. I believe that the Torah was not written by Moses alone, I believe it was the Israelites who were with him that completed the task. He was attributed to the Torah because he was the Israelites` savior from Egypt which would probably explain his prominence in the chapters.
The Bible was written by Jews during their enslavement in Egypt therefore they still have some basis on what they write in their texts. Not all of them are insane.
Mice can easily reproduce unlike humans. I know it can be immoral but it is necessary to develop our scientific field.
No since we need to do so for the development of science and technology especially in the medical field. I would rather see a mutated animal than a mutated human.
If they can provide for the needs of the child and be able to shape them into good individuals then they are eligible to do so.
Yes since no one has the right to control your own happiness.
Your arguments are already going far from the said topic since people control is`t synonymous to population control. Anyway, laws are present in our society to keep people in their place. We don`t necessarily need a dictator, only a leader to follow.
Just because something its`t evident dose`t mean it is completely non-existent since as a race, we still have more to discover in our universe so counting God`s existence out is made by pure assumption.
Yes since there has been no present scientific and logical evidence to prove or disprove God.
Inter-specie intercourse causes more diseases than regular intercourse therefore it is wise to choose the lesser evil. How can the animal say yes or no regarding the matter wherein animals have no voice of reason. They merely act upon instinct. Animals look at humans as their master or their superior being since humans are the alpha race.
Population can be easily controlled through proper family planning since it is much more practical, cheaper, and environment-friendly. Remember that diseases evolve along with us so it would be wise to prevent it rather than to cure it.
No since abortion can only be committed if premature baby also known as the fetus is aborted from the female.
Smoke is a leading cause of diseases that lead to death and is also a major contributor in world pollution.
But it can still cause diseases with humans therefore must not be done. Prevention is always better than cure and viruses also evolve along with us. As per your statement you said that you had sex with your German shepherd and it would mean that you forced it to have sex with you. Animals are less likely to develop a sexual relationship with their master unless the latter forced them to. This can be also attributed to animal abuse which is against the law.
What about the detrimental effects of over population in a small country? How would they be able to sustain their people if they cannot feed them?
yes because the quality of life must be prioritized over its quantity.
Not every Christian is like that you know, only the narrow-minded ones. Christians also value respect to others and engage in charity which help people in need. In my country religion has helped people find homes, food, and education.
Yes since it serves as a guide to the lost and gives hope to the hopeless. Although its leaders are give trouble to the world, its teachings help humanity become more humane although one must not believe in everything they read in spiritual texts. Its fine to follow religion as long as it does not hurt anyone.
No since society itself is not ready to accept a naked person in public. People with different beliefs would judge the person immediately leading to chaos and misfortune of the nudist. Children would also misinterpret the act of being naked their own way and may go wayward in their beliefs and delve into something they are`t supposed to.
No since they only worsen the situation instead of helping the country. They also engage in their own interest rather than helping the country itself. The US also abuses the people whose country they occupy. Therefore its not their place to do so.
No since they are the proof of genetic or external diseases which affected the human body.
What do you think would happen to you then after the death of the human race?
No. Eventually I would be sick of living since every last one of my loved ones would be dead and I would be left alone in this world. Knowing that you may die in the near future makes the present moment more precious and life worth living.
I believe that the holocaust was worse since a fully living and sentient being is subjected to death compared to a premature fertilized human being.
I believe not since your rewards or punishments are tantamount to your actions no matter where you look at it.
No since Science can be easily be followed even for a Christian.
No since God is a being beyond capable understanding therefore his actions span beyond time we are capable of knowing and thus invalidates our own understanding of 'day'.
Killing humans would only lead to a cycle of hatred which would go on forever. The loved ones of Magneto`s victims would try to kill him and if they do, his children would try to avenge him. Therefore the cycle will go on forever until nobody knows what started their dispute in the first place. Look at it this way, if world war 2 never ended the present generation would still be fighting against each other even though the ones who started the trigger were gone forever. Therefore something must be done to stop this cycle of hate, either both sides get eradicated or both would work together for a better future.
I learn better with textbooks since tablets are distracting and I find it harder to memorize stuff using it. Tablets are also more susceptible to being stolen from kids since it costs more than a textbook.
They should`t since it is a way of teaching them the value of responsibility and cooperation in the house hold. It would also help them in the future when they move out of their parents house.
Engaging in sexual acts with animals may cause certain diseases which are harmful to the human race. It is also a sign of physical abuse to the animal since it would likely to be forced into having sex with a human.
Well as he is believed to be omniscient I think that he does.
Obviously, prayer would not be enough to get what one wants. One must strive for it himself. Praying and believing is only a part of being Christian. Like everyone striving to achieve something, action must be taken what ever your belief may be.
Yes since Christianity does not denounce such acts as inappropriate. As long as he does not do harm to others then it can be done.
I believe so since there have been scientific evidences of unexplained phenomena through out the world.
Both genders are smart. It just depends on how they use their intellect.
Yes. But maybe it would be proper for them to concentrate on the medical divisions in the military. I think they will be more productive there since they have a physical disadvantage among men in the battle field.
Yes but not totally. It would somewhat create a negative consequence over a negative action therefore the child would avoid that negative consequence.
No since everyone is intelligent. It is only in the manner of using that intelligence where one may be termed smart or stupid.
Evil is the absence of good. Therefore it reflects upon the absence of God. He also did something to prevent it. It was the sacrifice of his son to save humanity and the 10 commandments.
Evil is the absence of good. Therefore God did not create evil, man created evil since man refused to accept the goodness of God.
Religion does not depend on Science. Therefore it may seem so little to you but it means much to its followers. Call us fools if you want. I don`t care. Even if there is no way to prove it thus far. Its God`s principles that make us follow the religion. Religion on my perspective is not perfect but is a way to commune with one another and understand each other`s sufferings. Whether what deity we cling to may be true or false. It does not matter. Its how we interpret the message. I don`t need to find truth in everything that exists. I just want to enjoy life on how I find it to be. Like you, people judge you as someone different because of your beliefs. But you make the most what you see in life.
It means that God created the Universe using the laws of Physics. So therefore that may be termed as the big bang theory. He was probably the catalyst.
"What i mean is, everyone always says when someone dies that it is god's will. Well if it is his will, why cant he just poof the person dead on a whim? Why does he depend on diseases and other accidents to do it for him? Why did he need a shooter and bullets to take those 26 kid's lives? Why is he so dependent on the natural processes that he created spontaneously?"
As I have said, he does things according to the nature of his creations. For an example, a person has to die of some cause so that he may be termed as dead. If not, then that would question the validity of the death of the being. He probably just chooses to act upon the nature of things for man to properly understand natural phenomena.
"Until we somehow fucked up and he intervened to flood the earth. Then send his son to be sacrificed. and if you ask me, id say were worse now than back then. So why isnt he interveing anymore? Where is he?"
He may not be present in our universe but he is intervening since phenomena out of human control happens. He also acts upon a different timeline from us. That proves that change or evolution does not happen overnight but through succeding periods of time.
He knows every result no matter what choice we take.
One should not resonate on the concept of punishment alone. It was said to discourage a person from doing such evil to another person. Hell is for me is a state of being and not a physical place. When one commits evil, then one gains adversaries and through such adversaries, then hell shall be brought upon by them.
I do not invalidate omnipotence. I only state that it is illogical for him to do so since it will violate his very nature of omnipotence.
I would like to write it more since I want things to go exactly as i dream t of .
I like Batman since first of all, he has the storyline closest to reality aside from Iron Man. Plus he is secretive and only helps the others in need with out fame and b.
Republic since there are more people in control and that a balance of power would be practiced.
I think it is alright since it is`t detrimental to society and that it only fulfills the fantasies of people.
Personally I believe that public transport is more efficient since the vehicles shall be maximized most of the time and the destinations would always be in one place. Further more it also adds to the proper utilization of energy since trains and other nature friendly vehicles are much more efficient and less hazardous to nature.
Somehow I find the Simpsons decreasing in its comedic acts. Well, for me I find Peter`s retarded actions and Stewie`s faggot antics most amusing.
He cannot, not meaning that he is a weak creator but it will violate the nature of his omnipotence. God acts upon the nature of things. An example would be the creation of the sky, if God creates a sky made up entirely of soil, then that would violate the nature of the sky and the earth since it is impossible for the sky to be made out of soil since there is already a substance that exists that is made of soil which is the earth. Same goes for God. There already exists a being that can do everything therefore he cannot create something that he cannot undo.
It does not necessarily mean rest like what we do when we are tired. The Hebrew word, shabath, translated "rest" does not really refer to a requirement to sleep or take a break due to weariness. It means that God stopped and ceased to let his plans into motion.
Yes since the continuity of the human race consists of innocent beings uninformed of the future vices they may commit. It is the system of our civilization that is rotten, not the race itself.
Sorry, I made a mistake. This was supposed to be on the other side.
I believe it is since it believes in Christ. Even though there are practices not approved by the Bible, there is no purest form of Christianity so if one will consider Christianity as not a Christian religion, then I believe almost all protestant religions should be classified as such since we have our own interpretation of the Bible itself.
I believe it is since it believes in Christ. Even though there are practices not approved by the Bible, there is no purest form of Christianity so if one will consider Christianity as not a Christian religion, then I believe almost all protestant religions should be classified as such since we have our own interpretation of the Bible itself.
I think that he should first lower out the budget of those actions of America that is`t in utmost importance. An example would be the reduction of military funding since it is more important to take care of the civilians first before the military. Another would be the increase of taxation from the higher class Americans. Let`s face it, they don`t need money as much as an average person does, so even a 10% increase in taxes from the higher class is`t such a problem. Further more is the proper resolution of corrupt government officers and proper spending of taxes. As what Mahatma Gandhi said: There is enough resources on Earth to satisfy Man`s needs but it is insufficient to satisfy Man`s wants.
No. Peace can never be permanent. Even the slightest disputes can lead to war. Diplomacy is at least better than war in settling problems. But I don`t think that peace will be attained permanently by any means necessary.
I don`t think they should since they run through donations and they have no private businesses. If they would be to pay for taxes, then they would have to start their own business as well. It is also in the law that charitable institutions are exempted or at least reduced from the burden of taxes.
I don`t think that Atheism itself is a piece of crap. It is just a form disbelief in a divine being. Both Theists and Atheists are subject to ignorance, only in different forms are they presented.
It is a form of removing waste in the body similar to anal secretion. Thus it is perfectly natural.
I think it is good. It helps us dwell deeper into the abyss of human emotion and comprehend ourselves hence if we are subject to the same condition.
No since Nuclear radiation has detrimental side effects in which not only the Pakis would suffer from. It would also render their expedition useless since the land would have to heal first before being used. Approximately thousands of years.
It is the responsibility of the school to uplift its quality of education since the government is not always present in the vicinity. Therefore if the standard of education should be increased, then the school should increase its qualifications in being a teacher. Adhering to the increase in the quality of the teacher`s skills, a higher salary is its just reward.
You cannot raise a family and live in our society with passion alone. Money is a necessity to all.
Well scum bag teachers should first of all be filtered properly by the school. I don`t think it is the government`s responsibility since the school itself must create its own standards and thus these scumbag teachers are only present since they allowed them to be so.
If you give them less, then less students will take up being a teacher as profession and the problem in education would increase.
Personally I think both. No matter how we came to this existence, regardless of what or who may it be from. I believe that is our purpose, to know the unknown and take care of the things we hold dear.
