Me too. I prefer dogs since they are easier to train and they`re are`t as cranky as cats. They also make great jog buddies.
I have already disputed your statements before. Therefore you clearly are`t paying attention to what my arguments are about. I was only adding additional scenarios for you to understand how little does gender play in the morality of a person.
Reeeeaaaaallllyyy? So I guess I should never bother to explain to my sons that "no means no?" Any age girl is fair game? And if they get pregnant they should just run off and find someone else ASAP. I'll make sure my daughters never learn that by being irresponsible, she could be robbing her child of a chance to have a decent father and a whole family. It is better to go around tracking down 15 different men for paternity tesets just hoping for some child support.
This statement dose`t even make sense. The topic is about homosexuals being involved in adoption not straight people letting their children be adopted. The moment for an example your child gives your grandchild to the orphanage as per your statement, there is no certainty that your grandchild would have a decent home even with straight people. As for your daughter`s case what if she is`t just ready? Would you rather risk her and her child`s future just to be a family even though they would only end up in poverty?
True. People are only brave enough to make arguments on how wrong that person is but when it comes to doing anything they just don't care.
That`s right. When a women gets murdered people go raging on males when if a male gets murdered almost no body cares. If we want equality then we must care for both sexes.
We are given free will to make our own decisions. He helps us by giving us choices. Therefore he cannot directly help us since he already gave us free will which would contradict his gift.
Obviously you are a narrow minded person. You said it yourself that being educated and straight does`t have to do anything with each other therefore why restrict an educated homosexual to adopt if they are worthy to do so.
Let me make another example that even a person like you can understand. Who would you rather be with in a room, a straight murderer or a homosexual who has good morals? In these times gender is only a small factor in the thinking of man. Nurture plays a bigger role than a nature in the decisions of an individual in our society. Try improving your argument rather than putting stupid and moron in your arguments. You only sound like a sore loser.
Sexuality is only a small factor in teaching ethics. Maturity, educational attainment, experience and the like play a bigger role in teaching ethics. Would you rather have an illiterate straight couple rather than an educated homosexual couple who can provide you what you need?
Students should be able to love learning not fear it. Having a strict teacher only puts stress in students thus making learning a chore rather than a fun experience.
I believe that he also prioritized money rather than inventions. He also tried to ruin Tesla`s hard work with ac just to make him the big man of the light game.
Karl Marx. I believe that his ideologies got out of hand which resulted to countries like North Korea who value very little of life.
Inaccuracies are meant to occur during experiments. It helps us perfect our prototypes.
