lesbians should be allowed to adopt. f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f
no gay males should not be allowed to adopt. f ff ff f ff f f f f f f f f f f f ff
no because the blood could have aids and it could be murder.
no since no one else was feeding the hungry family. f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f ff f f
yes since there should be no hungry people without stealing.
the animal is not a human person so it can get the death sentence.
yes the animal murdered the person and now the animal must get the death sentence.
rape can be murder. f f f ff f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f ff f f f f f
rape can ruin someone's life until they die. someone could be sad their whole life because of rape and die miserable. where as someone could live a happy life until they got murdered.
the age of majority should be 19 but its better to have it at 30 then to allow rape to happen.
yes because how could they be guilty without doing offenses to the innocent. so protecting the innocent is more important than punishing the guilty. if you protect the innocent and don't punish the guilty there will be less guilty and more innocent. if you punish the guilty and don't protect the innocent there will be more guilty and less innocent.
19 years old should be the legal age for sex. it shouldn't be more or less than that.
no but their jail sentence should be longer the more times they repeat the offense to prevent them from doing it again since if they aren't learning their lesson then they should make their punishment harsher.
I don't think it is suicide like they would of died either way no matter what they did, they didn't have the choice to live so how could it be considered suicide?
yes it is they should get life in prison so they cannot murder anyone again and so they get what they deserve.
its okay if lesbians marry each other though. f fff f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f
no gay males should not be able to marry each other its just gross and evil.
the ten guilty that go free could make the one innocent party suffer later on. how does this question make any sense at all???
if ten guilty go free then they are going to make more than one innocent suffer when they commit crimes against them because they were set free and not kept in prison where they couldn't harm anyone. I don't think the question being asked makes sense.
yes there is only truth and lies. what's proven true a few times can be proven forever to be true. the truth cannot be a lie. a lie cannot be the truth. a lie can be like an illusion if it distorts someone's sense of reality.
without religion everyone would be smarter and healthier. without religion there could still be different belief systems that people would have that would have someone or some people made into an authority figure that millions or billions would follow, believe and obey. women could be authority figures that decide the laws and males could promote and obey them or males could decide the laws and promote and obey them. women would still be less strong than men so women wouldn't be able to rule over men unless there were more women than men. or without religion then there could be a one world totalitarian government and one authority figure that everyone on earth would obey which could be a male or a female. without religion there would be authority figures that were people in place of deity authority figures. or without religion maybe there could be one world anarchy with no government and everyone ruling themselves or one world limited government like libertarian.
women should not be people killers. military men should not become women that were people killers.
male veterans should not be transgender anyways, they are violent and have killed people. women should not even be in the military and should not have killed people. women should not be killers that's what men are for. women don't need to kill women just need to be taken care of. women should not become men that join the military. men that join the military should not become women. women should just be innocent and peaceful.
yes it does. even the Hubble telescope cannot see the surface of other planets but there must be life on other planets if there is life on earth. there must be planets surrounding stars with the same size ratio as the sun and earth and that can support life.