No sex is better than the other. Yes we may on average be physically stronger and have better spacial recognition, but women on average have better memory and tighter packed neurons which help in the language region of the brain. Both men and women however have similar overall IQs. Scientifically, we have differences, but they aren't so imbalanced that one sex can have total superiority in every category.

We also gotta remember, the flight or fight response can be triggered in more situations other than just direct physical harm. And I find the appropriate response based off circumstances. There is no single correct answer for all situations. For me, I'll admit that I don't like getting in a sticky situation on most cases, so my response would be flight. But sometimes when the risks are acceptable enough to me, I'll land a punch, explode with sharp words(though trying to stay logical as possible), or just have a generally aggressive response.

In a 1 v 1 situation, America wins hands down just with numbers alone. America also has well trained troops, advanced technology, nuclear weapons, and other weapons. Israel has some of those traits, but not to the same extent as the US. The U.S. also pours lots of money into defense spending in order to research and buy new equipment. I'm not saying Israel doesn't do the same, but U.S. is a bigger country with more resources to overpower Israel.

Evolution is not a predefined chain of events. The environment simply sets the conditions for certain traits to win while other traits lose. It's not like pokemon where you "level up" after getting "experience points" :P

I think the environment determines half of what a person is. The person's personality which is coded on a person's genes determines how the person will react to the environment. I consider that the other determinant.

Depends, who are the "stupid" people? >:)

And also morality is subjective.

That's implying that all porn stars are inherently stupid. I'm sure they know tons of stuff at the things they're good at! ;)

There are jerks in every group. Jerks are not limited to one ideology. :D

Stereotypes do not determine how all individuals act. Also, the non-jerk type of Atheist are likely to be less vocal about their Atheism that those people are underrepresented.

At a personal level, I'm an Atheist, but you don't see me going around and acting all superior to others just because I think differently than my religious counterparts.

Most people see it as wrong when other people are doing it to them. For the person being arrogant, It provides them a way of being very self-confident and gives them motivation to succeed. Though at the downside, it reduces your chances of getting along with people and having strong relationships. Morals are subjective. It's all perspective.

As long as you have the knowledge, training, skills, and work ethic necessary for the profession of your choice. And if they are going to drop out, at least get a job that allows them to sustain themselves.

Hey, if there's a topless girl, it's a no-brainer for me!

Awesome? No. It has just as many problems as any other country would.

Only if the law is unjust. If the law is reasonable, then I would disagree.

I don't see what's wrong with wearing a bracelet that promotes awareness of breast cancer. Even if not all the money goes to breast cancer, its message is at least spread out that it could find potential donors that do more than just see or buy the bracelet.

Shit happens. It wouldn't make a difference if a corporation owned it or if the government owned it. If a corporation lost a 6.5-Ton Satellite, we'd likely just replace NASA from the debate title with the company name.

Any absolute position for either side is not gonna end well. In some cases, the customer will be rude to the person providing service. On the other hand, the customer service people can also do the same. It should be a case by case basis.

I'd like to see more testing on it to see if they could reproduce the results.

It almost seems like that we were created just to give God a nice ego trip. :P

If he was reasonable at all, he wouldn't have to worry about what us humans think as he should know that he's powerful.

Depends, are we on the control station or the business end? :D

I think the best way is to find a computer nerd :D

I'd like to say that I am one too, but even then, I still ask other computer nerds for help :)

The fact the liberals state their point of view like any other political party on how to run the government better means that they do care about America. If they didn't love America, they won't give a s---

Earlier on in the history of man, man wasn't as smart as they are now that things required more physical labor. With the progression of technology to do the backbreaking labor, people can concentrate on things that require higher intelligence. Intelligence at this stage in technology seems to reign superlative to physical strength because the only way to advance society is to think outside the box of new ways of being more efficient.

First of all, how advanced?

Anyways, the kind of math I use is mainly financial just to make sure I don't get ripped off and to make sure I can spot a good deal!

Average man vs. Average elephant - Odds are favoring the elephant. Elephant can outrun man and has more weight. Man can only escape if he runs in a 90 degree angle from the elephant to or finds a steep high ground to take advantage of the elephant's poor maneuverability.

Average man with vehicle vs. Average elephant - Odds favor man's escape. Most vehicles can outrun elephants.

Average man with gun vs. Average elephant - Man with decent firearms skill wins hands down!