CreateDebate


Infected20's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Infected20's arguments, looking across every debate.
infected20(304) Clarified
1 point

I think this person might be a bot. I declared that person as my enemy. I don't declare any bots as my friend. I just get fed up with the spam they post.

2 points

Smoking and vaping definitely need to be illegal because it causes environmental harm. Smoking and vaping definitely need to be illegal because both of them are bad for the environment. Smoking causes 7 to 10 times more air pollution than a diesel car engine, smoking produces 84,000 kg of carbon emissions, and smoking produces more carbon emissions than a diesel car engine. Vaping causes environmental harm by the nicotine spreading to other parts of the environment, especially when it spills. By the way, I think smoking cannabis should be illegal, too because it causes air pollution

1 point

Recess should be required in all grades. People are never too old to go outside, and going outside has many benefits to it. It especially needs to be mandatory in middle schools and high schools because of the rise of rickets. Recess needs to be mandatory in middle schools and high schools because it can help kids produce vitamin D, which is needed for bone growth, especially because kids typically have open growth plates. A lack of vitamin D can cause a bone disease called rickets, which happens when your growth plates start to grow in all different directions, which sometimes rickets can kill people, too. There have been people who have died from rickets before. Rickets sadly has been on the rise, so yes recess needs to be required in all schools, so that students can produce enough vitamin D, so that they don't develop rickets. Your bones are alive, too.

1 point

I think it needs to be because of the rise of rickets. Recess needs to be required in all schools because it can help kids produce vitamin D, which is needed for bone growth, especially because kids typically have open growth plates. A lack of vitamin D can cause a bone disease called rickets, which happens when your growth plates start to grow in all different directions, which sometimes rickets can kill people, too. There have been people who have died from rickets before. Rickets sadly has been on the rise, so yes recess needs to be required in all schools, so that students can produce enough vitamin D, so that they don't develop rickets.

1 point

Yes it absolutely needs to. All Google does is track people and use filter bubbles against people with can severely diminish the quality and relevancy of the search results. How can something be the best search engine if all it does is provide you what it thinks you want?

1 point

We could just go paperless. A lot of businesses are doing that, and I think it's good.

1 point

I think it's definitely important that we should. Pollen has more protein in it than meat, which makes it a better protein alternative to meat that causes significant amounts of pollution.

1 point

Yes. Both of them need to go. Sex segregated camps and camp facilities are harmful to intersex people, people without a biological sex, and other people of rare biological sexes because it discriminates against them since there aren't any camps or camp facilities for them since they are only a very small minority of the population. That's why I think it's very important to include minorities. Plus, if race segregated camps and camps facilities are illegal, then why aren't sex segregated camps and camp facilities illegal then?

1 point

Yes. Neither of them need to exist. Sex segregated changing rooms and dressing rooms are harmful because they discriminate against intersex people, people without a biological sex, and people with other rare biological sexes. Plus, if race segregated changing rooms and dressing rooms are illegal, then why aren't sex segregated changing rooms and dressing rooms?

Quote

1 point

Yes. We don't need them, and they cause way too many issues. Sex segregated sports need to go because they are harmful for intersex people, people without a biological sex, and people without other rare biological sexes since they discriminate against them. Plus, they cause issues for transgender women, transgender men, and non-binary people who want to participate on certain sports teams because sometimes they can't.

1 point

Yes they absolutely should. We don't need sex segregated clubs. Sex segregated clubs only harm intersex people, people without a biological sex, and people of other rare biological sexes, too because there aren't any clubs for them since they are a very small minority of the population, because of this, they will only be discriminated from these clubs. I just think it's silly, too why sex segregated clubs aren't illegal if race segregated clubs are.

1 point

There is no reason why we need them, so yes. I feel like we should get rid of sex segregated schools because they're harmful for intersex as well as other rare biological sexes that exist. Yes there are more than 2 biological sexes that exist. Any sex segregated thing implies that there are only 2 biological sexes. There are people who don't even have a biological sex either because they were born without sexual anatomy, meaning that they won't go through puberty, so sex segregated schools even discriminates against those kinds of people, too. I'm curious to know, too why sex segregated schools aren't illegal if race segregated schools are.

1 point

Yes. They need to be abolished. Sex segregated bathrooms absolutely need to go because intersex people exist. I just think what intersex people have to suffer when it comes to going to the bathroom in a public place. The whole 2 sex segregated bathroom thing implies that there are only 2 biological sexes, which is far from the truth.

1 point

Houses have become priced too highly to where only millionaires and above can afford them in the U.S. and most countries. If essential goods get priced to where only millionaires and above can afford them, then the government does need to step in and out a price roof because otherwise those people will suffer.

1 point

Yes. I believe this is an important thing that absolutely needs to be done. The houses in the U.S. and a lot of other countries are overpriced and need to have a price roof put over it because, otherwise, a lot of people aren't going to be able to afford to get houses. Most people in the U.S. and the world aren't even millionaries, so why do houses cost to the point to where only millionaires and above could afford it? The houses should only be 1/10 of what they're worth. It government should make it illegal for people to charge $100,000 or more for a house.

1 point

The reason I don't think we should have them if there for distribution purposes is because otherwise it supports monopolies.

1 point

I still think there are ways the government can increase the number of rainy days.

1 point

No, but I think they should be less protective. I don't think we should abolish copyright laws, but I think we should at least change them. We should allow them to exist as long as works of art are being used for non-distribution purposes. What I mean by that is where they aren't being given or sold to anyone. I don't mean where works of art are being uploaded to social media. I feel like people should have to register their copyrights, too. I don't think that works of art should automatically be copyrighted the moment their created. I think it's crazy why works of art in the U.S. are automatically copyrighted the moment they're created. What if someone doesn't want their work of art to be under copyright? I feel like, too that if you are allowing copyright laws for distribution purposes that you are only just supporting monopolies, which I think is bad.

1 point

Yes they absolutely need, too. Governments absolutely need to require people to replant living trees after they get cut down because it will help to fight climate change by soaking up the carbon-dioxide released back into the atmosphere by living trees that are cut down.

1 point

I think cutting down living trees should be illegal unless the trees are diseased and can't be cured or if the trees are damaging the house. If that is the case, then I think a tree service should be required to inspect the trees and that a permit should be required for you to cut down the trees. The permit would include of picture of the trees you can cut down. The reason I say this is because trees can produce carbon-dioxide when you cut them down, which can contribute to climate change

1 point

Yes governments absolutely should. I think governments should absolutely encourage people to compost food because throwing away food can produce significant amounts of air pollution, and they produce methane gasses, which are worse than carbon-dioxide so throwing away food could contribute to climate change, and even more so than with gas cars.

Reply

1 point

I think that meat that causes a lot of air pollution should be banned. I'm not saying all kinds of meat. Just the ones that cause significant amounts of air pollution

1 point

Foods that produce significant amounts of air pollution should be banned because they can contribute to climate. I'm not saying that we should ban meat though because there are some meats that don't produce significant amounts of air pollution, like chicken meat

1 point

Yes governments absolutely should. If governments encouraged people to grow food instead lawns, people wouldn't need to have to mow the lawn that much or at all, which would mean less carbon emissions because carbon-dioxide can get released into the air from mowing the lawn just from the grass getting cut.

1 point

Yes governments should. Street drains would help to prevent rain with pollution in it from running into water and harming aquatic life. Governments should also require substance mixers to be placed underground so the machine can cause the harmful substances in the water flowing through to react with other substances that will make them beneficial, so no underground life gets harmed.

1 point

The government absolutely needs to. Rain can help to reduce air pollution, which can help fight climate change, especially since climate change has caused ancient viruses from 50,000 years that can harm people to reactivate, however, I think the government should also require more city drains to drain out the pollution to be installed. The drain would also have substances to react with the air pollution to make it a less harmful substance, too.

1 point

I think a lot of the food we eat in the U.S. is very unhealthy for you. Wonder why the cancer rates are high? Think of all the bad food we're eating.

1 point

No, and I wish people would stop believing that we are. We can find other ways to survive without eating fruit, the bees don't pollinate a lot of our true vegetable crops, there are seedless fruits that can get produced without being pollinated, and humans can pollinate flowers by hand, too. If a person can survive without eating meat, than a person can sure survive without eating fruit. A lot of true vegetables don't get pollinate by the bees. A true vegetable is a crop that doesn't derive from a flower. We would still have seedless fruits if the bees or any pollinators went away. Humans have actually been shown to be more effective pollinators than bees.

1 point

Yes it should be. Pollinating flowers when humans are the ones doing it is actually more effective than insects pollinating the flowers. Plus, human hand pollination actually provides bigger fruit and better tasting fruit.

1 point

Yes, we absolutely need to. We need to stop killing flies because they can help pollinate flowers. Also, if you're using fly spray, just think about all of the harmful chemicals you're putting into the environment. You could exacerbate climate change.

1 point

Yes, we absolutely need, too because it's harmful, too. Spiders don't harm people most of the time, can help remove insects that are harming crops, and pollinate flowers. Plus, if you use spider sprays, just think of all the hazardous chemicals you're putting into the air. You could exacerbate climate change.

1 point

Yes, we absolutely need, too because it's harmful, too. Spiders don't harm people most of the time, can help remove insects that are harming crops, and pollinate flowers. Plus, if you use spider sprays, just think of all the hazardous chemicals you're putting into the air. You could exacerbate climate change.

1 point

Yes, but only the harmful ones. I think only the harmful mosquito sprays for yards should be illegal because they can harm the environment by having the pesticides go into bodies of water by being carried by rain and by killing the pollinators and birds and other living things and because it can exacerbate climate change.

1 point

No, but I think we should watch how much we're killing them. I don't think we should stop killing the mosquitoes, but we should watch how much we're killing them because they can pollinate flowers. The reason I don't think we should stop killing them is because they carry deadly diseases

1 point

We need to stop killing the ants. There is absolutely no reason why we need to kill the ants. They can pollinate flowers as well as help to decompose dead stuff. If they get in the house, just use a contain or a bug vacuum to trap the ants, and bring them outside. Using those harmful pesticides can harm the environment as well as exacerbate climate change.

1 point

I don't think we should stop killing wasps entirely, but I do think that we should watch how much we're killing them because they do pollinate flowers. We should only kill wasps that build their nests in areas where they're harmful to people, like carbon monoxide vents, underneath door frames, underneath garage frames, underneath porches, inside umbrellas, or inside mailboxes. If we kill wasps all of the time, just think of all of those harmful chemicals were putting into the air. It could exacerbate climate change.

1 point

Yes we need to absolutely ban harmful pesticides. Harmful pesticides are harming the pollinators on this planet, they're exacerbating climate change, and they're harming our food.

1 point

I think it should be illegal to raise honeybees because they can crowd out bumblebees, wild bees, and native bees. Plus, they're not as effective as bumblebees, wild bees, and native bees. By the way, the whole Colony Collapse Disorder that so called started happening back in 2006 never actually happened. Honeybees have actually been on the rise, not the decline like most people think, and the concentrations of pesticides are too low to where they aren't killing them. They are however, killing the bumblebees, the wild bees, and the native bees.

1 point

Yes. I think it should. I think 14 would be the better option because it would give younger people a right to vote and try to change society, especially with how many people are becoming informed on politics these days.

1 point

I think that we should focus on trying to get gas cars off the highway to try to tackle climate change, so no, we should not have a maximum speed limit sign.

1 point

If we got rid of private ownership, it would help to reduce greed, so yes I think we should convert over.

1 point

I think public ownership needs to go because the government alone shouldn't be the one to own everything. Everything should be socially owned, that means owned by everyone in the society.

0 points

Absolutely not. If retired people don't have a lot of money, then income taxing them could hurt them because it could put them into poverty. Only poor people who have excessive amounts of money should have to pay income tax or even a lot of taxes at all.

1 point

Yes private ownership should be abolished. Private ownership only just causes greed. I think everything should be socially owned. Social ownership is when everyone in a particular society owns something. This differs from public ownership because in public ownership, just the government owns something.

1 point

Yes. Vaccines are definitely a human right. People have the right to protect their health, which vaccines do just that, so making vaccines illegal only just violates human rights because it violates the right for people to be able to protect their health.

1 point

I feel like money absolutely is a major violator of human rights. Money violates the rights to happiness by creating anxiety in people to have more of it, it creates unintentional poverty, it keeps people who've fallen into unintentional poverty from being able to get food, it keeps people who've fallen into unintentional poverty from being able to get water, it keeps people who've fallen into unintentional poverty from being able to get clothing, and it keeps people who've fallen into unintentional poverty from being able to get housing.

1 point

Vaccines should absolutely be mandatory because if they're not, then everyone else's life is at risk because the people choosing not to get the vaccine will be able to spread the deadly virus around.

1 point

We absolutely need to. Wars can cause air pollution through their machines since they cause smoke, which can cause in pollution the air and because some weapons can get into the water, too, which some of those weapons are chemical because it can exacerbate climate change, which there is already a virus that's coming back to life that can harm humans, too all because of climate change. Also, it violates the human right to peace, too.

1 point

One reason I think we spend a lot on our military is because we want to be and act as if we're the best country in the world.

1 point

Yes we need to defund the military. Our military is excessively funded. We spend over 500 billion dollars on the military, which the second most powerful country, which is Russia spends significantly less money. They only spend 87.1 billion dollars. We should cut that money and direct it towards our healthcare.

1 point

I feel like the police system is in need of major reform. We need to do stricter background checks as well as have a higher degree of accountability for when they cause violence.

1 point

Yes we should abolish political parties because people should be free to believe what they want to believe. Plus, political parties cause too many issues within society, too. They also cause too much stress in our society, which is bad since too much stress can cause health issues.

1 point

Yes because I think that money needs to go completely. Taxation is theft, inflation is immoral, and owning money is evil.

1 point

Older people can help to benefit the economy, so absolutely.

1 point

Raising the price of goods is always immoral because then it causes poor people, especially poor working class people to not be able to get stuff, especially essential items.

1 point

Charities don't often help poor people, and humanitarian aid organizations often destroy the economies of other countries and/or they go to the corrupt leaders of their country. I think a government program should be used instead.

1 point

It should be illegal for jobs to require an address for jobs. It's just going to keep the homeless people from getting jobs and earning money. I also think it's unconstitutional that jobs require addresses, too. I think it violates the 4th amendment, which is the right to privacy because jobs shouldn't need to have to know where you live. A violent person could get a hold of your address, and then your house could be arsoned.

1 point

Social classes are an unnecessary evil that society has been created to degrade people and create mental health problems.

1 point

I don't think there should be a minimum wage period. I just think we should abolish money together.

1 point

No. I think he and all of the other devils are fake completely. I think it's something that we teach younger kids.

1 point

No. I think angels are absolutely fake. I think it's absolutely something we just teach to younger kids.

1 point

The United Nations almost acts like a world government. They also haven't done a good job at keeping peace, and they praise harmful stuff, like declining fertility.

1 point

The cages absolutely need to go. They have been harming so many people. Obama did something very cruel and unusual.

1 point

I definitely think anyone who causes any sort of violence shouldn't be allowed to join any protest group because they're a threat to society.

1 point

I would say absolutely not. Big cities have a lot of pollution, hazardous chemicals, noise, and violence. Too much noise can cause brain damage as well as a heart attack. High amounts of violence can cause businesses to close and destroy the economy.

1 point

Yes. I think swearing is absolutely wrong. I think it's wrong when people use such harmful words. The f word especially disgusts me 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮��🤮🤮🤮🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢���🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢����🤢🤢🤢🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢��🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢���🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢����🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢.

1 point

Yes we do. It's very harmful how we stereotype men as being the creepy ones when the truth is that there are women who rape men as well as other women.

1 point

Education and learning are absolutely human rights. No human should be denied education based on their class. It's terrible that only wealthy people could afford education during the Ancient and Medieval Era. The one thing I would say that needs to change though is that student-centered learning, meaning any learning that isn't traditional based, meaning any teaching that uses the lecture method, should be required. Studies have shown that student-centered learning actually works better, and that one reason Finland and Denmark outscore the U.S. in education is because they require student-centered learning.

1 point

I'm saying if a person like is refusing to obey a stupid law.

1 point

So you agree with me on this issue. I definitely think most people would be willing to do this.

1 point

Yes. I think most people would be willing to get arrested if it's to fight for social change. I know I certainly would.

infected20(304) Clarified
1 point

Autism Speaks is no good. I'm not an autistic hater. Stop getting that impression. I've posted multiple things about Autism Speaks since they are basically against autistic people.

1 point

If you continue to comment nasty things on this debate. I will be banning you from it.

1 point

As an autistic person myself this organization absolutely needs to shut down. It is basically trying to get rid of autistic people.

1 point

As an autistic person myself, this organization needs to be shut down. The fact that they want to cure autism bothers me. It also bothers me that they try make autistic people seem like they're a burden and that they post false information claiming it's a disease, too. This organization is worse than Autism Speaks.

1 point

No. They should stay. Yield signs are needed, especially at roundabouts.

1 point

Intersections need to go because the create more pollution because people have to stop longer times at them. They also increase the risk of car accidents due to drunk and distracted drivers because are stopped longer at them.

1 point

Replacing stoplights with stop signs would help to reduce pollution since you're not stopped as long as you are at a stoplight, which is good for fighting climate change. It would also reduce the number of car accidents from drunk drivers and distracted drivers since you wouldn't be stopped as long. If you're driving at night, we could just put lights around the stoplight, have the stoplight be light up, have it be glow in the dark, or we could we a stoplight out of LED bulbs.

1 point

Stoplights are actually less environmentally friendly because they cause people to waste their gas when they're stopped at the stoplight. Also, if people want to get away from a person who's drunk or that is texting behind, and they can't because the light is read, and there are cars in front of them and on the sides, then they can't go basically, and the run the risk of getting into a car accident with them.

0 points

No. I know someone who is an anarchist who isn't violent.

0 points

Periods are bad. I can just remember when I got my period when I was 13, and it sucked having it. I have to be on medication to block it out since it gets so bad.

1 point

Most of the time, this isn't true because people usually don't care most of the time whether they look socially awkward.

1 point

Yes. I think money spoils people. It creates a lot of anxiety as well as mental problems in people to get more of it. It also creates discrimination against people with low-paying jobs that can't make a lot of money

0 points

People can still do bad stuff, even after they have been baptized.

1 point

I can't believe anyone would want this to believe. No one should be having sex without another person's permission.

1 point

Baptism won't stop people from becoming murderers. There are many people who have been baptized who have grown up to be violent people and people who haven't been baptized who haven't grown up to be violent and who do good things for the world.

infected20(304) Clarified
1 point

The question isn't talking about that though. It's talking about whether someone fully confirms to the norms of society.

2 points

No. No one likes to follow every single norm of society. Everyone is different.

infected20(304) Clarified
1 point

You realize a pedophile is someone who is 16 or older who is sexually attracted to a prepubescent people who are 13 and younger, and they have to be exactly 5 or more years younger. Most don't even act on there sexual attraction either. It's a disorder not a crime, which I don't have it. Please don't call people names if you don't know them either or I will ban you from my chat.

1 point

Hey, I just wanted to warn you that you are using abelist language. Imbecile is considered ableist. Some people might get offended by that.

1 point

I think they are absolutely silly. I feel like with technology advancing we could easily measure a maturity level with a brain scan. I feel like when it comes out that it would be great. I think we should have a height restriction for everything.

1 point

I believe we should have a height restriction instead since gigantiam and dwarfism exist. It's to prevent abnormally short people from drinking since it can affect their health.

1 point

With technology advancing, we could maybe measure it. I was reading about a brain can that could measure a person's mental age. I think if it comes out in the future, we could use it.



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]