CreateDebate


Isashellbell's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Isashellbell's arguments, looking across every debate.

Yeah, but I'm not here to argue about who's smarter or worthless shit like that, I'm here to argue about whether nice guys ever win, etc.

Ummm, no??? Why would I trust you, in any way? That makes absolutely no sense, and I'm thinking that I'm pretty much done talking with you now...

Since when does "being nice" involve insisting to someone you've never met that you're smarter and that they're a 'fucking idiot'??

Never.

Hmmm... I guess, but she can try and try to not care, but some way or another, pressure and blues about looks and stuff will get to her.

Also... being not as physically... athletic... is harder for sports.

Haha. You're certainly modest!

Anyways, I don't care what you say.

I'm here to DEBATE. Not argue, and get insultingly personal with people.

3 points

Hey, if it's their choice, go right ahead!

Anything from their is their fault and their responsibility. If it upsets the parent, too bad for them-- shoulda thought of that when they were being raised.

Alright, unless we've all taken IQ tests, there's no way to measure that.

It only shows that you're meaner, definitely not smarter.

It seems that your technique is to call people idiots just to make them step off and move on to another debate... but it's not proving that you're smarter. At ALL, actually.

You seem arrogant enough to claim that you're the smartest person on earth... but I guess you'll argue that, too. Because since I'm OBVIOUSLY of lower IQ level, I'm PROBABLY wrong, so what do I know? You're right again, mister! Ah, just amazing how that always comes out the same, isn't it? Sweet Bejesus, you're smart, dude!

Congrats, and give yourself a pat on the back.

And while I have no way of knowing, by levels of debating technique, it seems to me that Kinda and I are both smarter than you. And nicer, but we'll never win this debate, because of that! Golly willikers, it sucks to be nice.

So if false is the winning side of the argument... then the mean guys are winning... so the nice guys aren't!

Alright, you win!

Oh hey... what's the name of the argument... hmm.....

WHO'S THE IDIOT NOW, SIRIUS?

I was right. =]

Symbols are quicker. I personally like the "3" with the dot on top of it and the dot on the bottom of it. =]

I guess everyone's an idiot except you, huh Sirius?

How does is feel to be the smartest person on Earth?

You're clearly an idiot, otherwise you'd understand.

The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.

0 points

Hmm, yeah. Interesting, I think that too. But right now, I don't think there's enough plantlife to support us at other planets....

But if we could just break from this solar system....

I'm not being irrational. I'll be honest and say that I've been trying to be nice to you, but you're a complete jerk. And one who is worthless to argue with, because you're not even attempting to see things the way I'm trying to tell you. Along with that, your calling me an idiot is pretty ironic, because my arguments are as clear as day and you're not getting it.

Goodbye. Good luck with life.

Yeah, I definitely agree with you. I feel like my life IS school. I hear adults complain a lot about working a '9-5' day, but I actually work longer than that... with waking up at 6 and going to school until 2:30, and then doing difficult sports (yes, they're my choice, but they're still the hardest work!) and homework until ten, there's a 15-hour day, and multiply that by 5 days a week...

Plus weekends, where there's work and meets/games and generally huge tests to study for a projects to do... who needs homework to fill "free" time?

[Changed my mind- just looked at #4]

4) Oh, ok. Whatever, I guess... I get what you're saying now, but why? Why did you have to call me that?

Ok, are you arguing just to argue? Because it seems like you're frantically searching for details to critique, because you could easily give in to an argument that I'm obviously winning.

[I'm going by your number system]

2) I actually don't remember what my 'logic' was, but OF COURSE it's wrong to do that! Robbing a bank is robbing someone, which is wrong. No matter the intentions. That's not their money to use. If they want to use their own money to donate, fine, but there is no excuse for robbing a bank for it. What if the bank company had a family involved that had some other great medical issue? Then you'd be saving the cancer patients, but you may have just killed someone else, by taking away money where it was needed to save another life. Nice going, nice guy!

3) I choose neither, thanks. Go back and read what we said, with my comment in mind. It'll make sense to you. I couldn't figure out really how to word it, but you made some kind of offensive comment. So I was on the defense.. I didn't know how to explain it any better. But do you kind of get what I'm saying?

4) ... Ok, thanks for saying "I understand what you are trying to say". I now have some belief that you're a real person with ACTUAL feelings, but honestly, I don't even remember what I was saying at that point in the argument, and I'm too lazy to go check. :)

5) Ok sure. That makes enough sense. I was just pointing out that that doesn't really secure the ARGUMENT too much, "Nice guys never win" (but I guess that depends on your interpretation of winning).

I think that you shouldn't have more than.... 3 abortions. Birth control... there's an idea!

I'm against abortion with the exception of rape and ABSOLUTE emergencies. I don't know... I've never been in that situation before, but accidents happen to everyone. So it's mos def possible.

5 points

My cousin is 'deaf'. However, when she wears hearing aids, she can hear perfectly and other than that, she is completely normal and fine. A wonderful little bright, happy, dancing 8-year-old.

So yes, if it's not a disability and they don't NEED special treatment or different treatment, then of course they should be treated equally.

If it's not equal, it better not be degrading or worse. If anything, when needed, it should be a HELPFUL difference.

This is not about Chuck Noris, though it could be...

I'm with Al Gore. We're screwed...

Really? I don't want to be a jerk if you're serious, but do you really believe that?

5 points

Wow, you just read an excerpt of my life book. No one else seems to agree with me, and it drives me absolutely crazy all the time.

This is pretty much the knowledge that I live by every day. And I didn't think that anyone else realized it or felt that way.

Go you.

4 points

Physically, no.

With our brainpower and selfishness and ignorance, most definitely.

Hmm... it seems like we SHOULD take control sometimes, especially if you're in danger. For example, if someone's raping you, and you have a gun or something... then I think you should be able to take the law into your own hands. Well, I know you can, for self-defense and whatnot.

I mean obviously, you can always do whatever you want, maybe not without consequence {hey, you might get thrown in jail or into the electric chair} but yes, I think that's good, that you can always.


1 of 3 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]