CreateDebate


Luchito's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Luchito's arguments, looking across every debate.
0 points

Maybe if the one who plays the bass in the band gets further back to the right and the one who plays the drums is located next to the exit door, maybe jazz sounds a little better that way. To play jazz you don't need to be a true musician but just learn to play an instrument and let your hands to make an improvised melody or sound. The drinks and drugs will do the rest in the audience. After that your brain learns how to accept such discordant sounds and whola! just follow the traffic...

-5 points
0 points

Liberals are social resent people. Barack Obama is a great example. A man born from the union of a black man with a white woman in times where discrimination against blacks was in progress. He grew up with hate in his soul against the American society. He used his oratory talent to become a politic figure and by faking to work for minorities he promoted a style of life inciting people to accept anti nature sex and signed laws protecting it.

About Joe Biden, what can you expect of a man who is a 50 years plus politician? This individual is a complete failure. In the 70s China received lots of US funds to become economically great, change its government to democracy and become a US ally. The result was the economical greatness of China and let it be the greater competitor against the US. Joe Biden participation has been a great disaster. Same Barack Obama never trusted him.

Having their main representatives the worst for the American society and economy, what can you expect from the followers?

Nothing good for sure.

1 point

To start, the illegal entrance to the Capitol Building by protesters of the result of the elections wasn't president Trump's idea.

This illegal entrance of people to those premises is a lesson that Democrats and some Republicans still refuse to learn.

In that day January 6, 2021, politicians finally tested in their own skin, what is to feel the sensation of seeing with their own eyes the illegal entrance of individuals into a land without the proper permit.

What it happened in the Capitol Building on January 6 is what is going on at the US borders every day.

Illegal entrance is illegal entrance every where, and same as those people who entered to the Capitol Building without a permit are under the hands of the justice court, same the illegal immigrants who enter into the US without permit shall be also under the hands of the justice court.

The hypocrisy of politicians is justify the illegal immigrant, forgive his fault and let him free while condemning the American, accuse his fault and keep it in detention.

Politicians trashing the Constitution is an every day task by their part.

1 point

Why making things hard?

Justice must be applied accordingly to the events.

When is about a murder where there are doubts about the culpability of the suspect, then the death penalty must be on hold, always on hold regardless of the years in prison and later freedom from jail.

But, when is about a murder where the suspect is clearly the criminal, caught in the act, with no doubts of culpability, then it should be no doubts to use the rope. In these cases no excuses should be accepted, no expensive appeals, just applying justice and leave the cell free for the next criminal.

1 point

I use a cell phone for communication and entertainment. To me the iPhone is the last in my list to be used for these purposes. With the iPhone if I want to listen music selected by me from my own sources, then I'm obligated to do it thru iTunes.

If I want to crate my own phone ring tone I must to do it thru iTunes.

There is no freedom to enjoy music with iPhone unless you subscribe and depend on iTunes.

About other features, most cell phones from other brands provide same quality than iPhone.

About apps, I don't use any.

I don't use apps because those are a path for others to get your location and private information 24/7. Using apps for me is losing your privacy.

Of course, people is free to decide how much of their privacy can be shared with others and they see as inoffensive the fact of being watched by others just by using those apps. In my case, I feel I enjoy more freedom without using apps in my cell phone.

0 points

As Batman you talk too much and lack of simple applications.

XY people to use men's bathrooms is a simple way to understand the current issue between sex and gender. To identify a person sex is what rules while gender is just the behavior preference of the individual.

Government is to catalogue people by their sex at birth not so by their gender's preference, however some agendas seem to keep the masses in ignorance.

Your error is thinking that masculinity is for men only. Such is not the truth. Masculinity is the standard, normal and expected behavior in men only, not in women.

You just can't force a woman to behave with feminine behavior, and on the other hand, a woman behaving with masculine behavior can't force you to accept her as a man.

See? So simple.

I, Luchito.

0 points

By no means.

Excuse my reply but no insult or malice is intended, but I think of a pregnant man only by him having abortions everyday between farts.

1 point

Family of mine lives in Washington DC. If asked by the owner of a house, the DC government installs a front and back camera for free in the properties. These cameras can be connected to a house security system or a computer. The "catch" is that the cameras also come with an antenna sending the images to the DC government surveying service.

Watching YouTube videos one can realize that any person can be under surveying cameras all day long everywhere. Sometimes the cameras installed on traffic street light poles are a kind of perturbing when their lenses appear to aim straight to you.

Question is, are people allowed to show the finger to those cameras?

1 point

Male becomes the sex status and masculine the gender.

In our species sex is man and woman. In other species the words male and female becomes the identification of their sex, and is also used with humans, however, the words man and woman are the most common words used.

A masculine woman is a woman behaving as a man, while feminine man of effeminate man refers to his gender.

The transgender ideology won't reach a transsexual status, and such is the great ignorance from authorities, who misunderstood such simple concepts and gave green light for effeminate men to enter in women's bathrooms.

Same as it was clarified with the status of a zygote right after conception, as genetically been a human being, same genetic status must be established to know who is whom in society with respect to sex. Applying science is the best to avoid disparate concepts between sex and gender. XY people must use men's bathrooms, XX people must use women's bathrooms, case closed.

I, Luchito.

1 point

Do you have a permit to carry a concealed chocolate gun?

I think police have the benefit of doubt when shoot defending themselves in front of a possible danger against their integrity. This is not a situation favoring to police only but also to anyone in the same situation.

The one carrying the chocolate gun won't aim against a police officer without expecting to have no reaction from the authority.

1 point

And what business have the government flagging posts in a social media owned by a private company?

1 point

Are all Jews good people?

I don't think so. Decades ago a young Jew teenager killed another teenager, cut the body of the victim in pieces and trashed them. The father of this teenager Jew took him to Israel before the son was arrested and according to the news later on, the young murderer was to be on trial by an Israeli justice court. No extradition was fulfilled.

I think that lots of Nazis were also criminals and many of them were also good people.

0 points

There is a common confusion. People mostly take gender as sex.

Sex is related to the sexual organs and body structure in general.

Gender is related to the characteristic behavior according to the sex of the individual.

An individual born man can behave as a woman, however his man is not a woman, he is an effeminate man.

Sex is identified as man and woman. Gender is identified an masculine and feminine.

Our human species have been designed by nature as having two sexes.

By consequence, in base of this biological fact, there are two gender categories only: the individual as a man or as a woman will behave solely as masculine or feminine according to his or her preference.

When a man have a feminine behavior such is abnormal, having in consideration that "abnormal" is not a synonymous of bad. Still, according to his sex, behave as a woman is abnormal. Same is established with other species IF males and females behave opposite to their sex at birth.

There are some ideologies that include other behaviors which might be considered by them as other different genders, but such is nonsense: only two sexes and two genders are the valid categorization for the human species. Rare cases of an individual having both sexes at birth, such is just birth defect. nothing else.

1 point

>

It happens that while white people won't be the majority in the US, on the other hand black people won't take that place either.

If you think that your argument using "freedom of speech" as your flag is the win win debate, my guess is that such won't work here.

Your "freedom of speech" might end if you insult a police officer, reminding him his mother and grandmother, screaming loud at him when he pulls you over because your over speed. Freedom of speech... right.

In my post I never suggested censorship, if you saw it that way, then show the phrase used by me for you to think I want to stop suck blackish tendency by movie and commercial producers. Their agenda is changing society under their point of view, using the communication media favoring their "revolution"?

I'm watching the soccer world cup in Qatar, the European teams appear to be African teams just by watching the race of their players, an example is France soccer team. This is proper way to show that everybody must be treated equal and must have opportunities in jobs, sports, etc.

But, mixing races? Pushing for mixing races? I know biology and I can state such is not good for society, weakens the human species. This doesn't mean such mixing must be prohibited, but that such mixing better not to be encouraged.

No matter your freedom of speech the way you apply it, but using such a freedom of speech to improve society not so to harm it.

1 point

>>

And what country is that?

Here in America, a famous dude John Lennon said his pop group was more popular than Jesus and fans protested his freedom of speech and burned LPs and screamed, cried, got angry, arggghhh...

Last elections showed the marvels of free speech when memberships were blocked if their opinions were against the results of the elections. In many social media places memberships were blocked and banned if their opinions were against the COVID 19 vaccines.

What country you live at where the communication media can freely argue the validity of the Holocaust, the arrival of man to the Moon, supporting the Russia invasion, comments against Islam, and so forth without being targeted by others and being banned from social media, losing their jobs, being practically discriminated because their thoughts?

A friend of mine, while we were watching a movie, he commented that today children are exposed to violence when they watch cartoons. So, I suggested him to watch the cartoons we watched when we were children. Popeye cartoons were full of violence, Daffy Duck, ha! forget about it, pure violence, and so forth. However, even when violence was a common denominator it was mixed with comedy, and the effects to the viewer must have been different. The three stooges is practically harmless.

Violence without being funny is a different scenario, and it may incite the viewer to cause harm to others when in the film the good guy is rewarded when he is the one committing the crime. Perhaps this is the inspiration that causes the crimes perpetuated by individuals against certain groups in our society.

Yes, free speech is a great thing, is a right, but is also manipulated by governments, the communication media, etc. The mind of people has been brainwashed so much that today films with violence is no solely entertainment but is also inspiration. Violence in films has reached a point when a poster is asking the question in this topic, if the idea of reducing it should be a next step, measure, necessity...

0 points

Besides violence, I also have noticed that the "heroes" of the series or films, they can steal money and keep it, they can kill and evade being punished or at least been "notified" by authorities because the justice taken with their own hands.

And I don't consider this mixture of an assumed good guy committing crimes while "doing good" as being a good example for children and youths.

1 point

Not that simple, it is not about me alone but about the entire society watching those blackish sided TV commercials, movies and more.

New commercials now include not only white blond girls towards black boys but also white old women shown together with old black men.

And I was watching a series in YouTube, where in a South American country the commercials are also started to copy such a tendency, and in those countries doesn't exist the radical discrimination between races like here. In those countries, as the new fade comes from the US, they just do "monkey see monkey do".

Late Hollywood movies are also the same, women beating white men like crazy, black women beating white men, a new hero who is not even black but wants to be called Black Adam.

I have no idea how the producers of those movies and commercials have convinced business to follow such a tendency and surely those business are not selling more products or making better profit providing more services because those commercials.

As I said before, the continued mixing of races at great scale will cause a weaker humanity in the future. In this aspect science rules and in order to maintain a stronger human species best is to keep the purity of each race.

1 point

Today I was watching the soccer world cap. A commercial from Samsung shows a white girl started a contact online with a black boy who is a neighbor across the street. due to that connection the buildings where both characters get more closer and both families can see one to another more closely.

In appearance this is a message of the holiday season but this is just going more and more into a current tendency to lift up the pushing of mixing of races.

Since decades ago slowly but surely the movie industry has been adding a hero black man who will have as a companion a white woman. This is not an issue in reality when is something sporadic. But when becomes a common denominator, this style of movies, TV series and commercials, this becomes an issue.

Watching carefully commercials, when is about a black man or young man and a white woman or young woman, there is body contact and even kisses. When is about a white man or young man with a black woman or young woman, usually there is no physical contact, no kisses, but sometimes accidents, like the white man throwing food over his girlfriend.

Other commercials worship the black man, like Allstate in my area. There was an original commercial where the car owner was talking by phone with a white Allstate attendant at early hours of the day. The same commercial was edited and the Allstate is black, but the dialogue is more extended for the black man. The same company has the commercial of a white man making a carving figure of the Allstate black attendant (Idol worship?). Another one shows a food stand where a female teenager give for free food to the Allstate black attendant (A Latino minor assuming to be working at that food stand). And many other Allstate commercials having as the main figure the black man not as giving service but receiving praises.

Most of TV commercials in my area show white girls always inn contact with black boys.

Movies are exploiting this tendency as well.

The primary issue is not that, but the situation is that while the producers are focused to promote white women together with black men, at the same time in most movies the bad guys are white men.

This is typical with original Netflix movies where heterosexual marriages are mostly identified with an abusive or cheater husband. At the end the wife or girlfriend ends in company of a black man, a homosexual black man or in love with another woman. Anything but the white man as the good guy.

This new tendency carries some disadvantage for society. I see no problem with men and women choosing their sexual partners. The problem is having children.

Contrary to the common understanding, mixing of races cause genetic diversity which is preached to be a good thing. The reality is that cultures that don't mix much with other races enjoy a greater diversity. The best example is the Bushmen, who are tribes that only have marriages between people of the same families, and they enjoy a genetic diversity greater than people who are mixed between races throughout generations.

When you mix dog races the dogs acquire sometimes very attractive physical and functional characteristics, but at the end of the day, the mixed dog is weaker than the ancestors. The Doberman lose vision at early age regardless of the attributes obtained with such a mixed race dog.

Same it happens with mixing of felines, including lions and tigers and similar. the offspring comes out more weaker than the ancestors.

In our society, encouraging the mixture of races is a great mistake according to biology. My opinion is that one is free to have the sexual partner one desires but at the time of having children best is to have them with a partner of the same race.

To end, I think that producers of movies, TV series, and commercials are pushing a mixture the races with some malice and giving an insane preference to exalt the black man and more recently the black woman. I say this because at the same time of promoting their blackish agenda, the white man is portrayed as the bad dude, the father of a family as a cheater, abusive and even ignorant.

1 point

Probably A and B had a love relationship without seeing also one to another as friends.

1 point

I think people has also the right to be anti semite, anti white, anti black, anti democrat, anti dogs, etc.

As long as the individual doesn't attack others, I see no problems when they give their own opinions with absolute freedom.

To me, as an example, when I see the rainbow flag bothers me a lot, because I disagree with such ideology, however I don't attack the members of that group, I just avoid them. And if someone asks my opinion about them, I feel I'm free to express my thoughts same as others who support that group have also the right to express theirs.

That new mode of playing cry baby must end. I want to listen BOTH sides and to make my own conclusions in everything. And I think the freedom of expression must be respected even when the others' opinions are against our opinions.

No group is to have privileges over others in society.

1 point

Illegal immigrant is not by any means offensive or discriminating but the correct description of an individual trespassing a limit or border illegally. Any person trespassing the line of my property with the attempt to settle in it, that is considered illegal entrance and settling.

Many illegal immigrants can't be called undocumented because they carry their country ID, plus many of them also carry fake ID and stolen social security numbers.

If their status as illegal immigrants is not recognized as such then the use of other "softer" denomination will lead to the lack of enforcement of the law.

1 point

When you try to help or save someone who is drowning then you might also put your life at risk.

When you help someone in such a trouble, you must do it thinking about your safety as well, because for you your own life must be the priority, unless you decide to be a legendary dead hero and die in the attempt.

If you find out that an attempt to save the drowning individual might take you with you to the depth of the waters, then just let him go and you return back home in peace, there was nothing you can do and you are free of any charge, even morally.You can even use your phone and make a video, and no one is going to reprimand you unless you use it for your own gain publishing on YouTube.

1 point

It is a current fact that science and morality do co-exist:

Corrupt scientists.


1 of 3 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]