No we still talk just in a differnet way then we used to. It helps us actually since we talk on the phone,online and in person.

It all statrted as a small ball of gas that exploded,aka big bang.

Now those poeple yes should be either kiiled or even tourtued but for people who are mentaly not there and don't know what they just did it is different. For thsoe who jsut do it for the thrill well it the chair for them!

While it si my first day it does help me get uo tp date on isses and how people think plus its a great way to let others know what I think about currnet issues and sucjh so it's a YES for me.

It's is never right to kill regardless,unless it was cold blooded and brutal. othweriwse I don't bleive it's right. kinda 50/50 on this issue.

How ture as for assault rifles wel lcars didn't exsist then or tv's but under the consitution we still have those rights with free sppech on tv and the internet. guns are the same way

I would have to say Kyle Busch. He wrecks anybody even his temamates and hates when anybody they do it to him. He never apologises to them and acts like he is a hot shot. That is why I find him the most annoying driver in NASCAR.

NASCAr is better,in the USA not many F1races are on tv unless you have cable and how amny drivers name's can you prenounce. faster is not better when you want crashes and excitment. I have to go with NASCAR on this one.

If he ever leaves golf the sport will not eb as popular. Alot of people watch golf jsut to see Tiger play. He is out with a knee injury right now and already players are saying it hurts the sport.

We have the right tho have guns for self defense as long as we don't us them to commet a violent crime and we use them only when needed. If we sue them jsut to kill someone or rob tem then yes we have no right to own a gun even for defense.

If we knew al lthe risks we would not ahv to do this expensive espoeriement i nthe first place. They really don't know what wil lhappen,only guess that they will find what they hope to find and that nothing will go wrong. with something this big something will go wrong,a fire,an explsion reease subatomic particles or the whole world goes jsus like that.

yeah supporting my own belief here in this debate. i would have to say condtions on other planets supprt life if not advanced life forms. Maybe not on Mars but somewhere in the Universe.

No we can't be> Earth is 4.6 billion years old. In the past it was over 90 degrees F. Today it isn't even 60 yet so if life surived that what is a chage of not even 2 degrees going to do. The earth is way older then we are and we ahve only been able to affect earth for less then 200 years.