Well have you been to the universe and experienced it yourself? No. Same as for seeing god. No one has ever seen god, but why do we believe in him, cause he teaches us good ethics and moral values. No one said it is wrong to not believe in god, or the real life. But The things around you is only reinforced by people, which they think its true, cause thats the best option in their mind. How is it that thousands of years ago, during the starting stages of civilization like the Chandra Gupta Dynasty, Aryabhatta who was a mathematician and astronomer, was able to find out the motions of the solar systems, and earths rotation, without using advanced tools. That is because they were driven by the force of god, due to their passion, they want to continue learning more and proving themselves to others.
You maybe thinking that there are many different types of gods, but i think there is only one god who came in different forms, to address each and everyone of you, to define who you are. For example there is two boys in the school with the same name, but different looks. They use the looks to define who you are, not with your name. Its the same concept. God is there to define us, to show who we are, to give us a steady path in life.
Since you guys think there is no such thing as god. Let me ask you this question. When you were born, your parents teach you the proper way of eating and wearing clothes etc. You do not know before you were born, but only when someone told you. How is it that you are able to believe that but not the existence of god?
Not many people will be interested in working in the Nuclear Power plant. The Radiation will cause our health to deteriorate. In my research about nuclear powerplant, i came across lots of websites explaining why and how important is nuclear plant but at the same time why and how it is deadly.
In the link below, there is a paragraph that explains how Radiation may decrease your life span by 15 minutes.
http://www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/
I'm sure you want to live long right? Just because you need the energy, why are you risking the lifes' of others.
What if the government does not dispose of the wastes from the nuclear powerplant properly. It is very important that we manage the waste well. What if the government wants to safe cost, so it doesn't dispose of the waste in the correct way? We would first have to measure the amount of Radioactive in the waste, and that depends on how to be disposed. If the Radioactive level is incredibly high, the government will have to dispose it by burying it in the ground, if it is low, then they could just dispose it somewhere not affected by humans. Either way it must be kept away form human contact a very long time. We are not always going to have the space to dump the waste right?
It is dangerous that we use Nuclear powered plant What if the goverment does not have enough fund to properly manage the nuclear powerplant? Or what if the natural disasters damages the reactors, causing it to be unstable. Isn't it still dangerous?
Dude, in comparison with Windows, Windows has more games than apple......
Hey Guys! I agree that there is such a thing as god, but in many different forms. Nature is just another form of god. God is our believe. He has created us, you say evolution but its just a theory. But not confirmed fully.
I shall give an example; Water.
Water in english is 'Water'.
But Water in Chinese is '水'.
Water in Malay is 'air'.
Water in Tamil is 'தண்ணீர்'.
You can clearly see that it is water, but look at the different names it has from different languages. All of it mean the same thing. Other religions have different names for their gods. But they are all the same. Atheist calls it Science.
When we were in primary one, our teachers taught us how to read and write through words. So it goes the same for this situation, When one is chatting with another, both are learning each other's way speaking, which makes them more sociable, so that they could understand each other better.
Yes i agree with you to a certain extent that many teens are using their smart phones almost everywhere. But maybe these teens are going to meet their friends so they are arranging the exact details on where to meet? Does that mean they are using social media to its extent? I certainly do not agree.
Social media is for us to communicate with others through many different ways. Tell me the truth, which way would you prefer, the easy way or the hard way? Obviously the easy way, but if you are the one of the 'rare species', then you would choose the hard way. Almost everyone would want to take the easy way out as it meeting up someone and having a conversation is troublesome. If the conversation is not important, why waste the precious time just to meet up with someone to talk only about 10-20 minutes.
Therefore i conclude that social media is not affecting us in anyway. It is only helping us in our communication skills. There are people who overuse Social Media too much, but its for each person to control themselves.
Would you like to waste your time by traveling to a specific place and meet up with your friends to discuss something, then take more time to go back home, or will you rather stay at home click on Skype and start a video chat and spend more time on discussing something. You see, from this we are using the time for more productive work. But Traveling to a place and meeting up is time consuming.
So you think meeting up in the social media does not help us in our communication skills?
Alright, then why are we now using the internet to debate than debating face to face?
Now even if we are in the same class, we are using technology. But does this affect our communication skills? NO.
It depends on each and every individual person. If you are unable to control yourself then why are you saying that everyone is like that?
You clearly said that most of us, but not all of us. This technology is very useful for us to contact with our friends who are farther from each other. What if our parents do not allow us to meet up with our friends for group studies or anything, then we will have to use the social media right?
No i do not agree with this.
Social Media has not made us less social as this technology is for us to communicate. It will only be used to communicate to another person who is far away from us.
Without this Social Media we will not be able to know what is happening in other countries?
Your naval base was too weak it was a fair chance for us to attack it as there wasn't enough guards there. We can't risk you collecting your resources against us.
What are you talking about? There was only one plane which carried the atomic bomb followed by another plane guarding it. Soon when they reached the compound of Japan the plane guarding the atomic bomb carrying plane flew back to their airbase. So we thought that it was just a plane flying by to monitor us or something. But little did we know that such disastrous thing would happen. I don't get it by solo planes and scout planes. There weren't any of such planes. only one as like what i said above.
Excuse me, two bombs? or Two nuclear powered bomb? Atleast a normal bomb could have just cause a small destruction. But your 2 "bomb" had caused major destructions.
Please do not use capital letters. As it isn't appropriate :)
Why do you care so much about China and East Asia? We bombed those places, but only to damage. But you, Mr Truman, have used a bomb that is going to affect the next few generations of those affected by the Nuclear attack. Even right now there are people who didn't even have any link to the bomb, suffering, because of the bomb you created. Is this fair for those people? Yet you are still talking about China and East Asia.
I totally agree. We did not destroy your city. Just because you were losing the war, losing your resources, so because of your ego - You wanted to win the war. Instead of doing an invasion or something less destructive as nuclear bomb would have been better.
What is the need of creating a nuclear bomb to kill innocent civilians when we just bombed Pearl Harbor. It was just a naval base with no innocent civilians. Well, we had to protect ourselves. What, do you think I am so stupid just to stand there and watch you destroy my country?
We didn't shoot down your plane because there was only one plane and usually you guys will fly in as a group. But instead sent us only one plane that has the nuclear bomb in it. Well you guys were busy building your planes and we were also trying to make alliance and get more resources.
What are you talking about? You did not give us enough time to plan our next move. Instead of dropping another bomb on Nagasaki, you should have warned us against it - Threatening us to surrender. But you strait away used the bomb two days later, you used it on Hiroshima.
At least the conventional bomb will only affect the people now; the Present. But the Atomic bomb is the deadliest weapon ever created in mankind's History. The effects of it will continue for at least more than ten years. Now which do you think kills more people, the atomic bomb which is still killing people and letting them suffer from then till now, which they had no link to the war, or a conventional bomb which is only affecting the current generations and stops?
We were already in a losing end, but we still fought for resources, for our economy. We already stated that we were going to surrender but what was Harry S Truman's Problem?
He did not approve it and thought it was a ruse. Instead using a conventional bomb which would have just caused us a few damages and lose a few of our remaining resources we would have surrender. But instead you used the Atomic bomb which actually killed most of our people. The next day, you bombed Nagasaki. Not even giving us enough time to take our next move. How is this fair?
