Science cannot explain morality. Morality is a God thing, meaning it isn't natural.
Also, I said science doesn't need to explain morality, which it doesn't and couldn't.
If we do what Canada does, there'll be days where it would be more productive to look up the treatment to whatever you're suffering from rather than go to the nearest emergency room.
Yes, he's fully God. He's also THE God. Like, of all the books ever.
never comes
If it's a reward system, the reward has to come at some point. Otherwise, it isn't a reward system. Also, no, capitalism and religion are not the same. Talent, hard work, or both will make you rich if you're patient. How do you think we have rich people in the first place?
HATEFUL or not
It's a silly attempt to disprove a DNA test, but it isn't hateful.
If we go off of the Google definition, then capitalism was invented because otherwise, the state would control trade as per usual.
amply earned
Except you call most people Jew haters. Most people don't hate Jews.
CARE
Because you aren't, for one, and because it's annoying. No one calls themself a Christian warrior because it doesn't make sense to say that and because it's annoying. The only religion that asks for warriors is Islam.
civil rights warrior
To get it out of the way, here's the Merriam-Webster definition of warrior:
a person engaged or experienced in warfare
NOT a Jew
Why do you care so much about whether or not people believe that you're a Jew? No one cared to ask about your religion, so really it's your fault that people say you aren't a Jew.
defend myself
Right, by calling them Jew haters rather than attempting to reason with them. Your arguments typically consist of calling other people Jew haters and then saying you are a "Jewish warrior".
dehumanise Muslims
That's interesting. Rather than disputing his claim, you called him out on something he doesn't do. Outlaw doesn't dehumanize Muslims, he dehumanizes Muslims who support Sharia law. Of course, we all know that that is a majority of the Muslim population, but we can ignore that for the moment. So, do you agree with Sarsour's statement?
under attack
But then you began to attack them. That just puts you at their level? How could it be productive in any way?
PUNCH mine
Or, you could try to initiate civil discourse. If you don't want to, that's cool. Few people will support it, and you'll also be thrown in jail again.
convert to Christianity
Where did you find that out?
cool with Christian haters
I'm cool with them being Christian haters. If I'm not mistaken, the Bible tells you to pray for your enemies. Of course, I imagine you don't follow the Bible, but I do. I'm supposed to pray for my enemies, and that's what I do.
I don't see them as helping the country if they're sabatoging the President's agenda. It's not their job to decide if the public will like or dislike a certain policy. It seems like they just want to avoid criticism considering articles typically refer to the President using "the (x) Administration". That's a bit out there, though.
nothing to do with Trump
Would you like to dispute my claim? Or, shall I do so myself?
You didn't answer my question. Also, I can see Trump for what he is, and I can stop dwelling on the past. You and your ilk, on the other hand, seem to have some addiction to it.
rational adults
The same rational adults who call people they disagree with liars?
acknowledge any evidence
Of course, because the pure word and nothing else is proof enough that Trump sexually assaulted or harassed them.
personal bias
I'm not pro-Trump. I like some things that he does, and I dislike other things that he does. And, on top of that, why would I disagree with God?
stop using logical fallacies
I was simply pointing out that Clinton rigged the primaries. And, I also asked for proof that Trump's election was a rigged result.
Faux News
I haven't watched FOX News in a while, other than for weather and things like that. Regardless, which intelligence agencies agree with the Russian collusion theory? And why are you trying to kick him out of the White House?
RIGHT
So the Right to Try act isn't an example of a good thing that Trump has done? Stopping the separation of illegal immigrants and their children isn't good?
coup d'état
And how's that?
Russians!
And yet you ignore Clinton rigging the primaries. And, on top of that, you have no proof that the election was rigged by the Russians.
deranged maniacal traitorous disgrace
Any evidence?
even now?
See what?
straight jackets
Yes, because imprisoning people with opposing opinions has always been an example of the United States, land of the free.
off our hands
It seems that, rather than actually disputing my claim, you're better in the insults department. After all, insults have always done well in politics.
It seems like the people in Trump's administration are simply trying to ruin anything they can about his agenda.
nothing to complain about
Of course, other than capitalism, "Jew haters", right-wingers, the list goes on.
Africa
I never said my DNA would show that. You're putting words in my mouth and I'll ask you very politely to please stop doing so because I've done no such thing to you.
NEVER did
You say we, but what about your family? Are they all Jews? And if you really are such a Jew, are you pro-choice? If so, why? Wouldn't that be against the Torah?
READ it
And you could answer my question. It seems we're at a loss here.
I don't care what you think about it
If you're trying to save your country from whatever threat you see on this website, you're doing a terrible job. For you to save your country, you need people to believe you, which requires people to trust you and very few people do.
Is that a medical diagnosis, excon?
---------------------------------------
His argument wasn't what you're saying it is. He was asking why the Left is never outraged by illegal immigrants getting drunk and hitting a family of four with a rental car.
correct?
Not when you kill innocent people. Al Qaeda has killed numerous innocent civilians for no good reason. So, no, they don't have the right to protect themselves. The average American, however, has not killed multiple innocent people. So, they still hold the right to protect themself.
likely to get shot
Or raped, or jumped, or shanked, or generally attacked. In most situations, you'll need a gun even if it's just to pull out for intimidation.
weapon it is
Yes, a weapon to protect ourselves.
a form of attack
Unless they attacked you. Then, you're defending yourself.
tyrannical government
Of course, because enforcing the Constitution and American law as a whole is, of course, tyrannical. We're much more tyrannical than Great Britain, which banned Lauren Southern forever simply because she's a far-right conservative.
hate Nazis
The ones that died off in 1945? Someone's holding a grudge.
HATE the white man?
Because there's no point. I haven't done anything bad to black people because they're black, and neither have any of my living family.
And, if they should hate white people, shouldn't they also hate the Democrats?
Except for the fact that that's illegal, and you don't have the right to kill someone for something they said.
I don't much care about this fiction novel you've been writing, excon. I doubt very seriously that anyone cares.
Republicans =/= the alt-right. Not all Republicans are people with alt-right beliefs. And, Wikipedia never confirmed Republicans as terrorists. It simply said that SPLC identified some attackers as alt-right, even though some aren't. If you knew anything about the Southern Povert Law Center, you would feel bad for citing them.
That's not an example. That's part of the Wikipedia page for "alt-right". That doesn't make your argument correct. This doesn't make punching Nazis right. It doesn't mean that conservatives fear the truth or factual accuracy. It simply means that you're another far-left commie who thinks that everyone who disagrees with you should be punched because they're Nazis.
Wiki tells me you are a terrorist
Where do you get this from?
fabricating statistics
I never claimed that rape victims create statistics. This is a problem a lot of liberals like yourself have, where they incorrectly assume what conservatives think when we say things, just to oust us as misogynistic or racist or whatever it might be. I simply stated that liberals misuse and misinterpret statistics frequently.
IQ or 17
When and where has it been proven that I'm functionally and mentally retard with an IQ of 17?
delusional liar
I never lied. Liberals frequently use false statistics to prove their point. Things like "one in every five women are raped each year in the U.S." to prove rape culture exists, and "33,000 people die each year from guns" to prove that we should repeal the 2nd Amendment. You are simply proving the title correct by saying these things.
based entirely on statistics
Last week's debate? I don't believe there was a scheduled debate last week over gun control. If there was, then yes, you would need statistics to prove your arguments because no one cares about what you think if you've got no evidence.
ignore objective reality
Weren't you one of the people arguing that objective reality doesn't exist?
You're an Ashkenazi Jew, and they originate from Poland. Not Israel.
liberals make this claim
Then I doubt very seriously that you read any form of a news article. Vox makes this claim, as well as multiple leftist YouTube channels. You most likely don't research this topic if you haven't seen that statistic at least once.
tit-for-tat
Funny how you mention this while disputing my argument against a person using that exact attitude.
much easier
And yet you've not refuted any of my claims at all.
denying climate change
What's that? I couldn't hear you over the sound of liberals screaming that 1 in 5 women are raped each year and shouting that abortion is a human right. Notice how I didn't dispute your claim, and instead made irrelevant references?
Are you saying all of this is good?
--------------------------------------
You mean pseudoscience. Regardless, it's liberals who provide false statistics like "1 in every 5 women are raped in the United States each year", ignoring the undeniable fact that it's been disproved many times over. It's not conservatives spewing these stats, it's liberals.
Are you implying that conservatives are afraid of the truth?
collapsed
It hasn't? The USSR collapsed in 1991, as did East Germany. The countries that haven't collapsed under their own weight are doing socialism correctly, in that they give the people no power or authority and the citizens have to wait in bread lines.
much higher standard of living
These countries are able to do what they do because America pays for their military. If we weren't, Western Europe would not have the things it has.
I'm not following. It doesn't really matter what he said about his inauguration crowd if it's false.
Some attacks in that report do not exactly fit the bill for alt-right crimes. Elliot Rodger's "Day of Retribution", for example was not an alt-right attack. Rodger shot several people and hit others with his car, and was only targeting women and their boyfriends.
As for the claim itself, namely "the alt-right is killing people", the alt-right isn't a group of people at all. You said yourself that it's ill-defined, and that it consists of multiple different and possibly conflicting ideas.
Also, you don't need to sign your arguments.
------------------
