CreateDebate


Tomcruise55's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Tomcruise55's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Please? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

1 point

hold up hold up hold up. Who was the blonde in the picture then? Like who is she in real life?

1 point

So I'm assuming that you don't hold a PhD? And you're not a professor? The definition of atheism "the theory or belief that God does not exist." maybe you need to check your sources again. And btw William lane Craig's education consists of " Wheaton College, University of Birmingham, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich" which are schools that are not just Christian schools last time I checked :P. Maybe you need to go back to school. Or at least attend a class or two if you haven't already. lol.

1 point

There's no evidence for atheism, that means that's inaccurate to then?

1 point

I bet you'd like to see Tom Cruise take it up the ass, wouldn't you?

1 point

And can you test evolution? That's a scientific theory that was based off evidence and reasoning. Unless you can explain how the universe has set laws and how it began. Because in a 3D universe everything must have a beginning. And not WHAT made it begin, but HOW it began.

1 point

He's a professor. And he also holds a PhD and if you've seemed to have forgotten he's also won various debates against atheists. Atheism is the belief in nothing, therefore you have nothing to argue. Unless you have a PhD in quantum mechanics and would like to enlighten us on your vast discoveries? lol.

1 point

You really make no sense. lol. You write all this mis-grammared stuff and then expect us to understand your stupidity. You're an insult to atheists everywhere.

1 point

Quantum physics is pseudo-science? String theory and a multi-verse are all pseudo-science? Maybe you need to go back to college. Or go to college if you haven't hahaha

1 point

I've demonstrated why he could exist, unless you can demonstrate scientifically why he couldn't exist than you are wrong. End of story.

1 point

I didn't use any faith whatsoever. I used reasoning and scientific method to deduce his existence. Just like the theory of evolution we cannot see it, but we know that it's there due to overwhelming evidence and reasoning.

1 point

Unless you have anyway to dispute and give reasons why "the shit he says shouldn't be taken seriously" then he is right by process of deductive reasoning. And you should probably do it in proper English.

1 point

Lol King James and a group of Oxford educated doctors are "some rednecks"? hahaha

1 point

No atheist theory has proven that he doesn't. At least we have viable evidence and reasoning to know he (or it) exists.

1 point

Ummmm maybe you need to look him up because he is a professor. lol.

1 point

Clearly you don't have anything to argue with. On the debate you bring nothing new to the table, so I think that it is fair to say I could come up with any argument I want. But you have trouble making even the most simple of explination.

1 point

There's wayyy more than just craig. You're just stubborn and willfully ignorant.

1 point

I'm trying to personal message you but it keeps saying "you're posting too fast".

1 point

Actually if you believe in entropy it does have an end. And then a re-set. But it had to have a definite beginning because there can be no effect without a cause. and no "action without an equal and opposite reaction". It's physics 101

1 point

He doesn't even know the basics of any sort of field relating to physics.

1 point

If intelligent life exists, and there was a "before" the big bang than whoever created the universe had to have been an intelligent force with the capabilities of bending the third dimension. Making him (or it) at least a 4th dimensional being. Even if the universe contributes to an infinite number of universes there has to be a beginning to each of them to set off the reaction.

0 points

Stryker is just a retard that doesn't know the basics of a multi-dimensional universe.

1 point

He asked first stryker, answer his question. I have already answered how God would exist. It's your turn.

1 point

How can you claim that intelligent design such as laws (law of conservation of mass, laws of motion etc.) are NOT created by anything higher. If the universe really was spontaneous and random there should be no order.

1 point

Except for the fact that that was before modern science. And now even modern scientists have overwhelming proof and deductive arguments for his (or it's) existence.

4 points

I'm guessing you have a PhD and are a professor as well? I don't understand why you wouldn't believe in God. I mean you look like Jesus. lol.

1 point

William Lane Craig (PhD and Professor) had said that empty space is not nothing. A void (or empty space) is still space, even though empty. It is still a dimension. Now a dimensionless state is nothing, empty space is something. According to Scotus Dun’s (Oxford graduate and scholar) argument of causes and effects there has to be a cause for an effect. An endless amount of causes (like the universe always existing) is impossible. In ancient Greece there was once a god named “chaos”, which literally was nothing. But they treated it as a god (or a supreme being) because it led to the creation of the other gods. Now scientifically, the universe happened when “nothing” began to vibrate and created a void, and continued vibrating until a small microscopic particle called the Higgs Boson (aka “the God particle”or particle that gives everything mass) exploded and created the expansion of the universe which led to the creation of 9 dimensions. 8 spatial and 1 temporal. Which led to mass but technically did not create mass because mass is positive and gravity is negative. So the total amount of mass and gravity equals out to zero, so it still follows the law of conservation of mass. Keep in mind before the big bang, time (the temporal dimension), did not exist. And after the big bang height, width, and depth were created, as well as time, which were 4 of the said dimensions. So as the universe expanded it created atoms which eventually fused and created suns and planets. One of which planet was earth. And the first life forms arose (cyanobacteria); which later led to humans. Now genetically all humans can be traced back to one male and one female, and in the book of Genesis the first humans were one male (Adam) and one female (eve). And the Dead Sea scrolls do not rule out evolution. In fact they support it. In the book of Enoch it describes Giant’s that walked the earth before and alongside humans, which supports fossil evidence of human evolution. Now explain to me how 5,000 years before genetic testing people knew that humanity started with one male and one female. Also describe how the Greeks would know about the vibration that led to the creation of the universe, even naming it, before modern science. And finally how can you explain how “nothing” can vibrate and lead to the something before TIME even existed? There scientifically had to have been someone to create that effect, because an effect can’t happen without a cause, it’s scientifically impossible. Plus the laws such as conservation of mass and physics are organized, and the Universe is spontaneous, and scientifically only intelligent life can set laws. Like Isaac Newton and John Scotus Duns both said that no cause can happen without an effect, and “every action has an equal and opposite reaction” sounds familiar doesn't it? Because without a cause there can be no effect, and there can be no endless amount of causes. How can you say that the universe created itself? Not only does that go against John Scotus Duns argument, Isaac Newton’s laws of motion, but even Einstein ruled out Atheism. Something will not and has not ever been created from nothing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial Eve

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-chromosomal Adam

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/duns-scotus/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BTT62YJCI8

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-energy_universe

2 points

And only an idiot would take the time out of his day to dispute it, or you might just be a virgin.

4 points

William Lane Craig (PhD and Professor) had said that empty space is not nothing. A void (or empty space) is still space, even though empty. It is still a dimension. Now a dimensionless state is nothing, empty space is something. According to Scotus Dun’s (Oxford graduate and scholar) argument of causes and effects there has to be a cause for an effect. An endless amount of causes (like the universe always existing) is impossible. In ancient Greece there was once a god named “chaos”, which literally was nothing. But they treated it as a god (or a supreme being) because it led to the creation of the other gods. Now scientifically, the universe happened when “nothing” began to vibrate and created a void, and continued vibrating until a small microscopic particle called the Higgs Boson (aka “the God particle”or particle that gives everything mass) exploded and created the expansion of the universe which led to the creation of 9 dimensions. 8 spatial and 1 temporal. Which led to mass but technically did not create mass because mass is positive and gravity is negative. So the total amount of mass and gravity equals out to zero, so it still follows the law of conservation of mass. Keep in mind before the big bang, time (the temporal dimension), did not exist. And after the big bang height, width, and depth were created, as well as time, which were 4 of the said dimensions. So as the universe expanded it created atoms which eventually fused and created suns and planets. One of which planet was earth. And the first life forms arose (cyanobacteria); which later led to humans. Now genetically all humans can be traced back to one male and one female, and in the book of Genesis the first humans were one male (Adam) and one female (eve). And the Dead Sea scrolls do not rule out evolution. In fact they support it. In the book of Enoch it describes Giant’s that walked the earth before and alongside humans, which supports fossil evidence of human evolution. Now explain to me how 5,000 years before genetic testing people knew that humanity started with one male and one female. Also describe how the Greeks would know about the vibration that led to the creation of the universe, even naming it, before modern science. And finally how can you explain how “nothing” can vibrate and lead to the something before TIME even existed? There scientifically had to have been someone to create that effect, because an effect can’t happen without a cause, it’s scientifically impossible. Plus the laws such as conservation of mass and physics are organized, and the Universe is spontaneous, and scientifically only intelligent life can set laws. Like Isaac Newton and John Scotus Duns both said that no cause can happen without an effect, and “every action has an equal and opposite reaction” sounds familiar doesn't it? Because without a cause there can be no effect, and there can be no endless amount of causes. How can you say that the universe created itself? Not only does that go against John Scotus Duns argument, Isaac Newton’s laws of motion, but even Einstein ruled out Atheism. Something will not and has not ever been created from nothing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial Eve

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-chromosomal Adam

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/duns-scotus/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BTT62YJCI8

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-energy_universe



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]