CreateDebate


Debate Info

130
108
its stupid Its not
Debate Score:238
Arguments:268
Total Votes:240
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 its stupid (127)
 
 Its not (101)

Debate Creator

AveSatanas(4433) pic



100 Reasons why its stupid to believe in evolution

https://youtu.be/Q8DDIe_2cHM

Nothing exploded in the big band and here we are making music!!!!!!!!  It's STUPID!!!

Seeing as saintnow is going to play the From Within game and ban people from his debates for simply responding to them, I'm gonna copy his debates so people can actually participate. 

its stupid

Side Score: 130
VS.

Its not

Side Score: 108
2 points

I know you don't want to discuss abiogenesis which is organic evolution because without it there cannot be evolution. I know the reason you want to separate the two issues and use it as an excuse for not watching or discussing the points of the video is because you know it's stupid to believe in abiogenesis.

Because you don't want to discuss the points of the video any further, there is no further need of your comments here and to help you save your breath you are banned.

Thanks. - Saintnow

So is abiogenesis evolution or do you need it to explain evolution? Which is it? Not like it matters because either way you're wrong. Abiogenesis is the process by which life emerged from non life. Evolution is how life, after already emerging, diversified. Two totally different things. And you don't need to know how life emerged to know the process by which it diversified. Evolution is true regardless of how life began.

I don't mind discussing abiogenesis at all. But your debate was about "100 reasons why EVOLUTION is stupid". So when Kent launches into a false assertion that evolution is abiogenesis that's just wrong. If we're gonna discuss evolution then define it properly. If we're gonna discuss abiogenesis then don't conflate it with evolution. That's not too much to ask. Furthermore, did you really expect me to sit here and type you a 10 page essay about why this over hour long video is wrong? Nobody is gonna do that and I entertained your request more than anyone else on this site would by watching it for more than 3 minutes. Also, why would I bother responding to it when right off the bat the guy we're supposed to treat as an authority on evolution completely botches the definition of the word he's supposed to be an expert on? Why would I entertain anything Kent hovind has to say after he shows how completely ignorant he is on the most basic biology definitions?

I'm happy to continue discussing the video if you wanna present individual arguments to me instead of expecting me to weed through an hour long video. You sent me a video but it's not ok to respond with videos?

Side: its stupid
2 points

hahahahahahahh.............funny stuff

Kent says "you mean the birds and the bananas had a common anscestor"......and the dark demon guy who seems to be on meth or crack bobbing his head in random jerky twists and and spins says "ummmmm, yeah, why are you surprised by that?"

Hhahahahahhahh

Good debunking there. That guy is on his way to Hell and he is parading in a costume like it's good to be in the dark. What idiots people like you can be, following other idiots to Hell.

And then he launches into an explaination of WHY bananas and birds have a common ancestor. But you completely ignored that part. Yes why would Kent be surprised by that? If he actually understood what evolution says then that wouldn't surprise him. He also doesn't explain why that isn't true he just states "bananas and birds being related is just stupid" that isn't fucking debunking. Thats purely his opinion. Meanwhile Logicked actually explains what evolution says and why that statement is true.

Watch more than 20 seconds of logickd s video. He gives clear citations and explainations of every argument hovind makes.

Side: its stupid
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

hahahahahahahh.............funny stuff

Kent says "you mean the birds and the bananas had a common anscestor"......and the dark demon guy who seems to be on meth or crack bobbing his head in random jerky twists and and spins says "ummmmm, yeah, why are you surprised by that?"

Well I'll be a banana's monkey's uncle!!! And I thought you said you were an animal, now you claim to be a banana...........hahahahahahha

Side: Its not
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
0 points

He launches into an explanation, a nonsensical explanation base on ZERO observational science, of why he believes a banana was your uncle's mother you monkey brained devil minded cuss wad pile of wet dust abusing God's air to talk bad about Him.

Side: Its not
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
0 points

why can't you make an argument without cussing? Is it because you know your argument is weak, and rather than admit it you try to give it strength by sticking your stinking profanity in people's faces?

Swearing is an attempt of a weak mind to express itself forcefully, and you can easily spot people who have a problem with abusive speech when they smile and you see empty spaces between their teeth.

Side: Its not
1 point

Take whatever 5 animals you want and compare each against each other and again humans

The degree of difference should be the same degree of difference relative to each otherer, between all 6 subjects - subjects being 5 animals of your choice and humans

Its not reasonable for 1 species to evolve to extreme advancement above ALL others. They should all evolve at similar rates. And there should be similar animals that equally evolved in the same way.

Intellegence

Logic

Technology

Tools

Agriculture

Social establishment

Government

Reading

Equations

Qualities of character

Conscience

Justice

Ideas and views

Beliefs

Emotions

Goals

Memories long term and short term

Reasoning

Physical coordination

Creativity

More and more and more ....

Side: its stupid
Cartman(18192) Disputed
1 point

Logic, Reading, Equations, Qualities of character, Conscience, Justice, Ideas and views, Beliefs, Emotions, Goals, and Creativity are all reasoning.

Technology, tools, and agriculture are all the same thing.

Government is just a part of Social establishment.

So, your list actually becomes:

Intelligence

Reasoning

Tools

Social Structure

Memories

Physical Coordination

So, not much difference between humans and other animals.

Side: Its not
KNHav(1957) Disputed
1 point

No they are not the same thing

Common Cartman

Humans created languages, then learned read and write in languages. Which other animal is capable of achieving this thought process eventually ending in creating language, defining words, describing things, writing stories, reading stories, doing research and categorizing. All using languages reading and writing??

Side: its stupid
KNHav(1957) Disputed
1 point

Qualities of character would be love loyalty honor nobility truthfulness honesty fairness etc

Side: its stupid
1 point

How would a self designed world choose only 1 species to Excell differently in every way above all others?

In essence a self designed world selected 1 to name the animals, care for the world, and cultivate the ground. But not give any of this to any other species, How?

Side: its stupid
1 point

It seems that some products of evolution have evolved to love and hate, share and be selfish, take turns, be truthfulness or lie, grieve and rejoice, have compassion, and be honorable, and just, or be ethical or unethical.

What animals evolved to this? It's not likely that a self designed world evolved only 1 species toward conscience judgement.if so how and why

Side: its stupid
Cartman(18192) Disputed
1 point

Humans love and hate a lot of things in a prejudicial way. Kind of like instincts. Kind of like animals.

Side: Its not
KNHav(1957) Disputed
1 point

Oh do apes also present this in at least a small degree?

Is it reasonable to believe scientifically or mathematically, actually especially mathematically, that out of the gazillion building blocks all we possess landed all in one species and 0 in others.

That would be like hitting the lottery every time you played it.

Or everyday, every year, for years in a row.

Please tell me how, so I can hit the lottery at least 1ce!

Side: its stupid
KNHav(1957) Disputed
1 point

Oh do apes also present this in at least a small degree?

Is it reasonable to believe scientifically or mathematically, actually especially mathematically, that out of the gazillion building blocks all we possess landed all in one species and 0 in others.

That would be like hitting the lottery every time you played it.

Or everyday, every year, for years in a row.

Please tell me how, so I can hit the lottery at least 1ce!

Side: its stupid
1 point

Humans love and hate a lot of things in a prejudicial way.

Hatred is an unproductive emotion.

Side: Its not
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

https://youtu.be/Q8DDIe_2cHM

100 reasons why it's stupid to believe in evolution

Side: its stupid
1 point

If evolution is not a person that distributes "special" abilities to specific species, then how did evolution distribute conscience judgement, inventive ability, and emotions, memories, imagination, and qualities related to ethics, and fairness, and sharing.

Animal instincts are adaptive.

I am saying in the basic animal aside from environmental adaptations.

If we as humans wrote stories by pictures in caves, and then grew to modern man, then what advancements above basic adaptations are seen in animals. Evolution has had to have distributed some of these equal to some degree, with a variety of progress seen progressing in nature.

So can any one tell me the degrees other animals followed in these qualities?

If the ability to have conscience judgement exists in 1 species, and since evolution is not a person distributing these abilities, then there MUST be other animals with conscience judgement! It can't be exclusive unless evolution had purposeful distribution.

Unless evolution is intelligent and a person, how them do all these qualities reside in ONLY ONE species?

How does that make sense and if it does, then tell me how and why??

Side: its stupid
Cartman(18192) Disputed
1 point

Memories are seen in other animals. Dogs have emotions.

Side: Its not
1 point

Multiple species have emotions, memory, "inventive ability" (aka tool usage), imagination (think subconscious, in the form of dreaming), qualities related to ethics (and fairness/sharing, it's a pretty basic aspect of social groups for mammals), etc.

The only difference is the degrees to which these are present, not the uniqueness of them.

And many traits only exist in singular species. The argument that evolution would have to disseminate them amongst multiple isn't based on any sort of scientific justification.

Side: Its not
KNHav(1957) Disputed
1 point

I see it as pretty foolish to think there is man compared to every animal and say that it developed that way at random to the degree of difference.

And I did clarify although there are limited personality and emotional traits in animals, and they can even acclimate to families, man is so unique, that it's not a logically possible that that degree of "uniqueness exists without the Hand from The Creator!

I think it's actually one of the dumbest lies I ever heard.

Side: its stupid
KNHav(1957) Disputed
1 point

When it comes to Creation verses Evolution, the focus of it is a blindness and a distraction anyway.

The point is not whether God chose to do it in 24 hours, or millions of years, and even if there were Nithilum existing in civilizations of prehistoric men, God made man in "His image" when He made Adam ...! And that included a moral conscience, a depth in emotion, and memories, and advanced brain functions that are high above all in creation. That's a specific design not a random outcome of evolution.

Regardless of your thought on how long it took for the world to develope, Bible says 6 days God rested on day 7, it also says He didn't make time to govern our world till day 4.

And since God is Light, a day in light can be millions of years.

So when the Bible was penned, it was penned to explain things that matter most to God and to Eternity, since this world will actually pass away. There is actually a plan with detailed directions from God on how to follow through this world in a personal level and also throughout times and ages, with appointed times recorded so we who become children of God can move in the direction of the end of completion without getting lost or sacked in by everything around us.

Even in the first chapters of Genesis God began spelling out His instructions and giving understanding. And He also hid understanding, to be revealed at "the appointed time"

The Bible is a story of God's creation specific to His children ... while setting in motion every detail written that we ever needed to know, to be redeemed, and then result in a final change into a nature of glorified bodies that CAN live in the His holiness and His light, so that we CAN live with Him forever. As we are we wouldn't be able to physically dwell in the "speed" of Eternal Light. And no darkness can be in us to dwell in His Pure Light.

While the rest of the world and its inhabitants from the beginning of time who missed out, are woken also to join in for this world's final destruction. ie.. Sheep / goats etc... to never exist again. God's children will be transformed into physical bodies that can and will live in the place where time stands still .... the "Light" of Eternal Life.

Side: its stupid
1 point

Hahahahaahahha............thanks!!! I hope this helps. Check out the 100 reasons evolution is stupid video. See if you have the backbone to watch the whole things, I know it can be sickening when the beliefs of evolutionists are challenged by simple common sense and hard scientific evidence.

Side: its stupid
1 point

https://youtu.be/Q8DDIe_2cHM

100 reasons why it's stupid to believe in evolution

Side: its stupid
1 point

Everyday of creation is a 1000 years of time till He establishes His Kingdom and ushers in His 7th day "rest" as His 1000 year reign, while He establishes New Jerusalem.

And from what I see it was NOT on the 2000 year anniversary of His birth, which was year 2000, (actually year 1996, because historians realized AD and BC are actually off by 4 years - imagine that, God may have purposely allowed this to provide a "delay" - as is mentioned many times throughout parables - "while the master delayed" or "Bridegroom delayed"

"No man knows hour or day" as Jesus said! - But He pain stakingly did say when we see times and seasons we will KNOW! In other words in Matt 24 He literally giving instructions! Detailing things, where to look, and telling us as time gets near there are appointed times and signs and seasons to understand in the Bible that correlate to what we see in history and current events.

Because the times are literally in there. And as time gets closer ... He is revealing .... and even says "revealing" things would be done at appointed time!

6000 years from Jesus' Death and Resurrection, is the TIME!

Not on the day or hour, but in that time period. We are in the end of day 6!

Every 1000 years is a day!

It's a scripture starement in Peter and also in Psalms! And if your read Ecclesiastical A time foe everything chapter, it shows appointed times, along with its object lesson.

Each 1000 years is a time keeper of events ... from putting Cain and Abel in, to replacing Abel with Seth to the births of Isaac and Ishmael into the world and into the timeline, to prophesying every single thing!

So one thing I see is, the 2000 year anniversary of the 1st Resurrection which is 2029 to 2033 is the approximate date (its a marker, could be before or after, but its around this marker in the prophesy timeline) declaring the final acts of this world, and the fulfilling of the prophesies of the "2nd Resurection"

(So it makes sense that if the last act is like the 1st act which is related in every way, to be a like time of final fulfillment on the Millenials (each 1000 years!)

Side: its stupid
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

That is not Biblical. Exodus 20:1, 11 .....God Himself in His own words by His own mouth said He made the heavens and the earth and all that is in them in SIX DAYS. If He meant six thousand years, He would have said six thousand years. You are making this stuff up for your own feelings afraid to stand on the word of God, changing the Word of God to make it easier for you to get along with ungodly scientists who do not practice true science when they say the world is billions of years old or big bang theory or any evolutionary garbage.

All that stuff you are talking about you are taking it out of context trying to apply it to Genesis. That is wrong, it's not Biblical, it's a hobby horse some Christians ride trying to compromise with ungodly pseudo-science.

There is no Biblical reason to imply the days of Creation were anything other than exactly what God said, exactly how God said He did it, and exactly how He Himself clearly stated it was SIX DAYS.

EXODUS 20:1-11

Side: Its not
1 point

Thanks for helping me get the message out........it's stupid to believe in evolution

Side: its stupid
3 points

Its stupid to believe in evolution. If you want to believe life is meaningless and you escape from being you in death, go ahead and try to prove it and see if you don't end up in Hell. Thanks for proof of your willful ignorance.

If you think the implication of evolution is that life is meaningless than you're seriously incapable of independent thought. Of course life has meaning if evolution is true. You're just asserting that is what we believe.

Ooh hell I'm so look scared. Its funny how you reject every proof of evolution and then your counter argument is threatening people with a place you've never proven to exist. So you expect us to prove evolution to you but you're not required to prove anything you believe in? Difference is we actually present you with proof, you just assert that you're right.

Side: Its not
3 points

Wow. SaintNow has crossed a line. He autobanned me for being a Hindu...

He said even though I don't use vulgar language and don't break the rules, I am auto-banned because "I am going to Hell anyways". Please continue to post these debates so I can see them.

Side: Its not
2 points

Christians believe they belong to an exclusive club. If you don't accept Jesus as the son of God, not only can't you join the club but you will be punished post mortem as well.

Side: Its not
1 point

Yup. If people like Einstein and Gandhi went to Hell, and Fred Phelps didn't, I don't know whether or not I want to join this "club".

Side: Its not
KNHav(1957) Disputed
1 point

There is a exclusive God and He has a people.

The question, is there an exclusive God?

If there is then yes there is an exclusive people, and culture.

It's citizenship. If you are a citizen in the Kingdom of God, then your culture will reflect citizenship of that Kingdom.

And you can join the club it's called free will.

What would it be like if God didn't really exist?

What if there was no Maximality, no Maximum Greatness, no Maximum Potential, and no Maximum Excellence to give form to abstract qualities, conscience judgement, and superior intelligence?

Who then created abstract qualities, conscience judgement, and superior intelligence?

What are the biological building blocks found in petri dish of nature are considered the building blocks of abstract qualities, conscience judgement, and superior intelligence that we see various degrees?

If we are absent of a Creator, then what elements, cells, organisms or particles, and compounds were initially deposited into the earth at the beginning of our world's conception to form the building blocks for abstract qualities? Or of conscience judgement? Or of superior intelligence?

If there are specific cells or elements are used as building blocks which later evolved to human abstract qualities, conscience judgement, or superior intelligence then wouldn't it be a reasonable scientific expectation as well as a logical conclusion that these same building blocks should also easily be seen throughout all living mammals, and also naturally present within our complex natural environment?

Or at the very least a diverse samplings with a similar evolutionary outcome from using those same building blocks with a relevant degrees of differences from man down to the lowest form of mammal

Side: its stupid
KNHav(1957) Disputed
1 point

It must be because Jesus said this:

Matthew 7: 13-14

“Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it. For the gate is small and the way is narrow that leads to life, and there are few who find it.

The question is; Who is (or was) Jesus?

If Jesus is indeed who He said He is, than its true. The majority will speed down the highway, and all those in the Exclusive Christian Club will go against the crowd to stay on the Narrow Way through the little Itty bitty gate.

And I must say, it's awefully kind of Christians to invite you to join them in their exclusive club, especially when a lot of you aren't really that great or easy in the slightest bit for us to help you, and invite you to come with us. So why do we? Why did martyrs die with forgiveness and mercy on their tongues for the very people who were killing them?

Are Christians just simple minded stunads?

Think about it. Now I know, there are sickos, like the 40 people in bread church of West Boro Baptist. I'm obviously not talking about creepy people that don't know Jesus yet insist they do! - Jesus said we can be good fruit inspectors, even if your not a farmer, you can tell good fruit from bad fruit, right??

Whether you agree with them or not, isn't it kind of nice, that even when people are horrible to them, Christians still invite them anyway, and that usually means a commitment to you, to help you through.

How many of you are committed to help others at your expense?

How many atheist are committed to you, to help you, with their time and effort at their expense, and usually accompanied with mean spirited people, we endure all to give you what we have, and to invite you to come where we are going?

Do you have a lot of people other than your mother who is willing to give you their time and effort, for ridicule and hatred in return?

.

John 3

5 Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water

and the Spirit he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.

6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.

7 Do not be amazed that I said to you, ‘You must be born again.’

8 The wind blows where it wishes and you hear the sound of it, but do

not know where it comes from and where it is going; so is everyone who is born of the Spirit.”.

Side: its stupid

Yeah, Aintnow crosssed the line from being a semi-competent debater to an intolerant elitest zealot a long time ago.

As far as Hindusim goes, I rather enjoy reading some of your writings, as I have mentioned before. The founder of my Church also embraced some Hindu tenets when he first founded Unity some 100 years ago. Although I admit I rarely hear much talk about it in church these days, I'm sure a good deal of our members are at least tolerant of it. We are probably the most tolerant and accepting Church in the country. And our services are probably a lot closer to what Jesus had in mind than any others I know of. We celebrate God and acceptance and love rather than condemn and mourn the state of Man, as so many others do. What is the point of that sort of thing? It is not what God wants for His most beloved creations, which are us.

Side: Its not
KNHav(1957) Disputed
1 point

So your church is embracing world views and you think that's a good thing? Have you read Revelations. The whole book is about the churches apostasy, and God's judgment against her harlotries.

You may not realize it, but Jesus spent most of His Words on training us on how NOT to be decieved.

It is actually a life and death message, with detailed instructions, warning DECEPTIONS WILL BE POURED OUT LIKE A FLOOD, and that if time were not cut short in those days, even the elect could be deceived.

So basically Jesus said in our final hours -BE SOBER AND ALERT!

He says Take heed, He who has an ear to hear - LISTEN, be aware, don't be decieved, many will say Lord Lord He will say I never Knew You! He told about the wise man building a house, so it stands when the storms come, The sower parable, the 10 sleeping virgins, the wheat and the tares, etc etc etc...

All this and He hammered it all like He was drilling us to get ready and prepared, like our lives depended on it!

Luke 17

32 Remember Lot’s wife. 33 Whoever seeks to keep his life will

lose it, and whoever loses his life will preserve it.

34 I tell you, on that night there will be two in one bed; one will be taken and the other will be left.

35 There will be two women grinding at the same place; one will be taken and the other will be left.

36 Two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other will be left.”

37 And answering they said to Him, “Where, Lord?” And He said to them, “Where the body is, there also the vultures will be gathered.”*

Revelations 17

4 The woman was clothed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and precious stones and pearls, having in her hand a gold cup full of abominations and of the unclean things of her immorality, 5 and on her forehead a name was written, a mystery, “BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.”

.

Side: its stupid

I believe in Evolution but refuse to argue it any more here. Because if there are still people in this day and age who have STILL stayed in the dark cave of ignorance and have refused to accept ALL the tons and tons of evidence for it, well, I am afraid that they are simply too far gone, mentally, to ever escape their denial. So why waste the time.

I officially declare here and now I will never argue for it again. At least not here on CD. To me it is about as useful as arguing with some idiot who is a Flat Earther. They're too spun, man. And I also equate the same chances of evolution NOT being true as the chances that the Earth is flat.

Side: Its not
AveSatanas(4433) Clarified
1 point

The thing that bothers me is that there are a lot of things in science that are worthy of debate. Within evolution alone there are still things being debated and researched to this day. Albeit those things require even a more nuanced understanding of biology than I have but at least those would be good places to argue with evolution. But instead of making well thought out arguments it's just the most insepid bullshit bottom of the barrel arguments. And not even arguments really but fallacies and misrepresentations mostly. They don't understand it so they straw man it over and over beginning with the mere definition of the word. They can't even muster an elementary school explaination of the theory.

Side: its stupid
KNHav(1957) Disputed
1 point

Why aren't at least some animals like us in degree of difference?

Looks like the universe picked one animal on earth to Excell, while all others adapted at a different rate?

If you have several pots of the same original water temperature to boil on the same degree of heat measure, with the differences in the various pots noted as pot sizes and water levels?

Wouldn't you think with some math and measurements that all the pots would boil at the same rate relative to the size and water level without any notable degree of difference between them that can be explained by math and science equation determining the rate of boiling by the size of pot and water level?

But science ignores the degree of difference between man and the entire animal kingdom!!

Actually that's where science gets a 0 for logic!

Explain the degree of difference in man relative to the degree of difference in like creatures.

Then compare that degree to man.

It's not mathematical or scientific!!

It almost feels like Sesame Street logic. That basic!!

Which of these things is not like the other...?

Lion, Jaguar, Bob Cat, House Cat

Polar Bear, Brown Bear, Asian Bear, Sloth Bear

Moose, Caribou, Elk, Deer

Man, Ape

If we take this sampling all animals are relative in degree of difference.

Even the apes degree of difference is relative to the stages of difference all the way down the lists of animals to the house cat.

There are no jumps in degree of difference between any of the animals. They all are adaptive to their habitat and live by the instict needed for survival.

There are 0 a big fat ZERO that are anything near the degree of difference found 100 % through nature that comes close to a reasonable degree of difference stepping up to man.

Then even adaptation, all animals would adapt and improve at a similar degree of difference in improvements. Again it's the same when compared to all animals and then to man!

Here is an example chart of degree off difference, even for man, using the most basic man without any advancements

House Cat --

..........Bear ------

..........Lion ---------

...........Ape -------------

Basic Man -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

...Adv Man ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Side: its stupid
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

hahahahhhaha......."those things require even a more nuanced understanding of biology"...........hahahahahha

What does that mean? More complications of explaining why you believe in evolution without it ever happening? I thought science was observation and study of facts that can be shown in experiment and repeated....but now it's increasing nuances so you don't need observable data and indisputable facts as proof of what you believe?

It's stupid, no nice way to say it. Believing in evolution is stupid.

Side: its stupid
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

https://youtu.be/Q8DDIe_2cHM

100 reasons why it's stupid to believe in evolution

Side: its stupid
KNHav(1957) Disputed
1 point

The Genesis Code is a Good movie to watch that discusses science in creation. I for one believe that God created science principles.

If you look through and pull out things God uses in His hands to establish His purpose in the midst of our formless, void, dark world.

He puts thoughts in minds, hardens hearts of people like Pharoah, rises up Nations to do His will, like Gog in hand will be an instrument of judgement, He will put in their minds what is needed to bring forth His judgment. And its coming, so yeah God is Good and Just. The world has grown to an evil that smells like stench and feces.

So, like Sodom and Gomorrah, and the Flood, He is going to close the book on evil once and for all.

So He has already set His purpose. He sent His Son who made a way for people, and a gazillion people over 6000 years will enjoy it.

But we are now in the 6000th year. The 6th day, the day of man, and we are in the last hours.

And if you understood the Bible you would understand its brilliance.

There is hidden information He only reveals to people who follow Him, and even them He doesn't reveal everything.

Some things are as the Bible literally says, even revealed at appointed times. Meaning it was in there for 2000 3000 years and at the appointed time, we see something in a familiar verse we never saw before.

If you need proof as in proof by your own filter, that is designed to filter out truth, then obviously God isn't going to PROVE Himself to you. Duh!

Side: its stupid

Two fucking hours of this moron blabbing on. How about 10,000 reasons why its stupid to believe in creationism?

Side: Its not
1 point

On some things I would generally agree it is stupid, however since terms are not clearly defined properly in your post I would be forced to stay on the it is not.

My Position Regarding Post: The micro changes to genetic information via Mutation and Natural Selection that decrease genetic information that Observable Evolution is 100% Fact 0 Disagreement with it, Undeniable, however the Theorized Evolution that we all came from one cell 3-3.8 bya then during the Cambrian Explosion multi-celled organisms arose, etc. I generally have disagreements as there is not much evidence to support this. Even though Kent Hovind had some good points in my opinion he wasn't that qualified he could have described how vestigal organs like the Appendix, Tailbone, and others alike are not Vestigal at all, but I will stay neutral on this.

Side: Its not
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

Observable evolution is 100 percent fact even though it cannot be observed? And you want me to say that you are not being stupid and asking other people to be stupid?

Side: its stupid
1 point

https://youtu.be/Q8DDIe_2cHM

100 reasons why it's stupid to believe in evolution

Side: Its not
Cartman(18192) Disputed
1 point

He should have spent his time doing a "100 reasons why it's stupid to not pay your taxes" video.

Side: its stupid
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

Yes, anything other than presenting sound logic and scientific evidence contrary to belief in evolution. You can't handle the truth.

Side: Its not
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

https://youtu.be/Q8DDIe_2cHM

100 reasons why it's stupid to believe in evolution

Side: Its not
1 point

IN my opinion evolution is one of the many scientific theories that cannot be disproved unless one is to deny all of the proof displayed to them.

Side: Its not
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

cannot be disproved unless you deny all the proof? Hhahahhhaah.....that almost makes sense. If you believe in eviloooting, you believe in something you cannot prove, you can't show it happening.......I suggest you watch the video on 100 reasons why it's stupid to believe in evoluton

https://youtu.be/Q8DDIe_2cHM

Side: its stupid
1 point

creationism is just a theory with no evidence just observe a monkey for a little while and you will see the similarities between our two species plus visit a museum once in a while

Side: Its not
1 point

Actually creationism isn't a theory. There has to be evidence for something to be a theory. Creationism is just a story that isn't even well formed as a story.

Side: Its not
1 point

OK that's cool i got mixed up between story and theory. But there's a lot of theories with no evidence so if you can see were i'm coming from

Side: Its not
1 point

More like 100 reasons people should be better educated on evolution and science in general. I'm not going to do side by side debate of every point because those have been thoroughly discussed for the most part. I will say that just because someone cannot or will not try to truly understand something does not make it stupid. I don't understand advanced mathematics but it is far from stupid.

Side: Its not