CreateDebate


Debate Info

10
8
Read My Stupid Comments Read My Stupid Comments
Debate Score:18
Arguments:13
Total Votes:26
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Read My Stupid Comments (6)

Debate Creator

BurritoLunch(6566) pic



Read My Stupid Comments

Side Score: 10
VS.

Read My Stupid Comments

Side Score: 8
1 point

Under the logic of this ludicrous debate, the Democrat Party supports slavery because it was the Democrat Party that supported slavery 200 years ago. According to this debate, it was not simply evil men who supported slavery in the name of the Democrat Party.

The mind numbing stupidity of this debate is saying that atrocities from the past have everything to do with the religion or the political Party, not the actions of evil men.

This debate s saying that it was the Democrat Party that supported slavery 200 years ago, therefore today's Democrat Party also supports the evils of slavery.

Does that make sense to any rational person? Nah, most of us possess the intellect to comprehend the obvious.

The anti Christian Bigot that created this debate, is using past atrocities by evil men in the name of God, and equating this evil with the Christian faith. Let's see, the Christian faith teaches us to love even our enemies, turn the other cheek, forgive those who have hurt us, etc. etc.

Does that sound anything like what this bigot is trying to suggest.

Even though I am Republican, and can see the evils of today's No Restriction abortion supported by the Democrat Party, I do not believe that today's Democrat Party supports slavery.

I'm funny that way, I actually formulate my opinions and beliefs on what I see today. I utilize my brain, and do not live my life with pure hatred for people simply because of their beliefs.

Using your logic, you support slavery! WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU FOR SUPPORTING SLAVERY?

Side: Read My Stupid Comments
0 points

Under the logic of this ludicrous debate, the Democrat Party supports slavery because it was the Democrat Party that supported slavery 200 years ago.

Hold on just a moment. That "logic" has nothing to do with "this debate". This debate simply states the fact that 40,000 innocent women were burned alive by Christians in a 150 year period. I didn't claim all Christians support burning women at the stake. That is something you have literally invented yourself because you are a deceitful and deceptive fool. Furthermore, you have also invented the fake fact that Christians no longer burn women at the stake. They do in fact still burn women at the stake, as you can see from this news report from just 4 years ago:-

Christian militias in Central African Republic 'burnt witches at stake', says UN report

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/centralafricanrepublic/12018588/Christian-militias-in-Central-African-Republic-burnt-witches-at-stake-says-UN- report.html

The mind numbing stupidity of this debate

Banned for being an offensive and deceitful liar.

This debate s saying

Try getting it through your obnoxious skull that you do not get to tell other people what their debates are saying. I literally just linked a news story. Everything else you made up yourself because you are an obnoxious liar who twists and distorts everything he reads around his own religious zealotry.

Side: Read My Stupid Comments
0 points

Does that make sense to any rational person?

Does a RATIONAL PERSON enter a debate focused on a news story about Christians burning women at the stake and try to turn it into an attack against Democrats??

I will happily unban you if you answer that question, you snivelling, hateful idiot.

Side: Read My Stupid Comments
1 point

Islamic ISIS killed over a million in a few years. Left wing Mao killed a hundred million.

Side: Read My Stupid Comments
MasterYoda(224) Disputed
1 point

Islamic ISIS killed over a million in a few years.

We aren't Muslims, and muslims aren't necessarily pro-isis.

Left wing Mao killed a hundred million

Those are fake statistics used for anti-Marxist propaganda and leftists aren't necessarily pro-Mao.

Christians are pro-christian and the women who were burned were burned directly because of christian belief.

Side: Read My Stupid Comments
brontoraptor(28599) Disputed Banned
0 points

Christians are pro-christian and the women who were burned were burned directly because of christian belief.

Then it should be easy to show us God demanding "witches be burned at the stake".

Side: Read My Stupid Comments
brontoraptor(28599) Disputed Banned
0 points

We aren't Muslims, and muslims aren't necessarily pro-isis.

Look at the absurdity of this statement in relation to the next statement.

Next statement:

Christians are pro-christian and the women who were burned were burned directly because of christian belief.

Side: Read My Stupid Comments
1 point

ROTFFLMMFAO !!!!!!!!! What the FUCK did WIKIPEDIA not give you the results that you desired?

Side: Read My Stupid Comments