Apparently, judging from the comments here, you are begging the question.

It is liable to be dismissed.

Therefore, dismissed it is.

AITs stand for Advanced Imaging Technology; they scan your body before you enter the airport for anything that could pose as a threat to fellow passengers. But despite these safety precautions, many people who are even slightly influenced by the 4th amendment believe that their privacy is being unrightfully breached.

AITs stand for Advanced Imaging Technology; they scan your body before you enter the airport for anything that could pose as a threat to fellow passengers. But despite these safety precautions, many people who are even slightly influenced by the 4th amendment believe that their privacy is being unrightfully breached.

Body scanners that peer through clothes are deployed in airports across the country. Travelers who object are subject to "enhanced" pat-downs. There are so many dangerous items that can kill many lives fore example: A weapon resembling a Klingon bat'leth was discovered in a carry-on bag at San Juan and an 8 inch double edged knife was concealed and detected in a replica statue of the Eiffel tower in a carry on bag. This was a very clever strategy to hide a weapon and if it wasn't for the scanners, someone might have been killed.

If you're asking does it violate the fourth amendment, no, if the search is legally done. Before you can determine if AIT is legal or not we must first determine what a legal search is in this context. If the use of AIT is considered a legal method of search (as it is), then by definition it is not an unlawful search.

Introduction

The TSA should be able to search people with scanners at the airport without hindrance no matter on how the people being scanned feel about privacy violations as it is a direct threat to security. While many people think this is a violation of privacy, without these scanners, security would be much weaker and there would be a higher risk of weapon imports.

TSA should be allowed to use imaging technology because without these controls any person could hijack a plane like it happened with the 9/11 and innocent lives could be killed. About 2,212 firearms were discovered in carry-on bags at checkpoints across Northern America. Of those, around 83% were loaded ready to fire. To add on Terrorist groups such as Islamic state, Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and Boko Haram were responsible of ⅔ of all such deaths, (2015-2016)

The TSA should be permitted to use advanced imaging technology to peer under passenger's clothing because of dangerous items. We need people to be safe and we have to make sure people don’t get hurt. That’s why it’s important to check. Especially from some countries like Thailand, Mexico and Southern America. The statistics of what people bring to planes, for example : A knife was discovered in a traveler’s carry-on bag at Jacksonville . He was permitted to leave the checkpoint so he could place the knife in his car. The knife was discovered again upon his return taped to a fishing lure.

TSA should be allowed to use imaging technology because it can detect dangerous items and drugs. Using AIT, the TSA officers are finding things like small packages of powder-based drugs hidden on the body. These drugs are so small, one packet was smaller than a thumb print. If it weren’t for the AIT than the TSA couldn’t have detected the items that were brought illegally . Some of the items that were caught by the AIT machines are: a pocket knife hidden on someone’s back, little packets of powder, a syringe full of liquid hidden in someone’s underwear, and other small items.“Our officers discover thousands upon thousands of sharp items in carry-on bags.”- says a TSA agent. Passengers are deceiving the normal security checks by bringing in weapons that are made up of non-metallic materials so they don’t alert the the metal detector. But now, thanks to the AIT many non-metal weapons are being detected. These finds demonstrate that imaging technology is very effective at detecting treacherous materials and can help TSA detect threats.

http://www.billofrightsinstitute.org/educate/educator-resources/lessons-plans/current-events/airport-scanners-fourth-amendment/ - This site shows that many people have opposing opinions on wether Airport scanners should be allowed to be used without consent of the public to search for weapons, deadly devices, illegal substances or signs of sickness as they beleive it is a violation of their privacy.

http://edition.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL/11/15/california.airport.security/index.html - An article by CNN shows how “despite objections” there is still a need for airport scanners as they are a major part of security and risk prevention, so if they were to be removed, the US would be in a vulnerable position.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/may/04/airport-scanners-here-to-stay - Many people are worried about their health when they get scanned as they beleive that there could be a risk of radiation however, officials say that compared to the radiation you receive on a daily basis, or even the cosmic radiation from your flight, it is a very small dose.

All in all, this shows that many people feel violated from these scanners, that is understandable but you still need to consider the amount of weapons and dangerous items being brought to america every day that are being stopped, In just 2015, over 2,100 firearms were found in carryon baggage in 263 different airports, this averages at about 7 firearms found a day in addition to all the other dangerous items.

Concluding statement:

In conclusion, Without people doing pat downs or scanning, illegal items are more likely to enter the country. Therefore increasing the risk of much more attacks.