CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:46
Arguments:11
Total Votes:61
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 AR -15 Was Not Used In The Orlando Shooting (21)

Debate Creator

outlaw60(15368) pic



AR -15 Was Not Used In The Orlando Shooting

So the Leftist Progressive Spin is taking place as we knew it would. "GUN CONTROL" ! The misinformation of the Leftist Progressives is never ending !
“Authorities have said the weapon used in the deadly shooting at an Orlando, Florida, nightclub was an AR-15."  They accusation is totally false as reported by the Left Wing Rag Yahoo !
Now the Sig is every bit as dangerous as an AR-15. It is sold in a semi-auto version to sportsmen and in full automatic by assorted special operations forces worldwide. The point is that it is not and AR-15 and no one, other than the media, ever claimed it was an AR-15. In fact, there is no humanly possible way it could be mistaken for an AR-15. This is not a mistake. This is a narrative. 

The action taken by a "RADICAL MUSLIM TERRORIST" is now being spun into an a "Assault Weapons Ban" by the Leftist Progressives ! All law abiding legal gun owners in this country should be penalized for the action of this one RAGHEAD KILLER ?

Add New Argument

Calls for "Assault Weapons Ban" by "Leftist Progressives"

like Bill O'Reilly?

ref

outlaw60(15368) Clarified
1 point

http://bearingarms.com/bob-o/2016/06/13/ narrative-fail-orlando-islamic-terrorist-use-ar-15/

The rifle used by the Islamist terrorist in Orlando was instead a Sig Sauer MCX carbine, a modular, multi-caliber (able to swap to different calibers, including 5.56 NATO, 300 BLK, and 7.62×39) rifle system that sometimes utilizes STANAG magazines common to more than 60 different firearms, but otherwise has no major parts that interface with AR-15s in any way, shape or form.

0 points

I've noticed that whenever a mass killing occurs anywhere, it is using guns. So why are people still listening to Trump and the NRA, when they are clearly talking bull. The statistics are against them. The only reason why they'd want to have their own guns, is so that they could screw people over, and still keep themselves safe.

Ayemaker(237) Disputed
1 point

When the people are armed there is less crime. Period. This is an indisputable fact. Countries that allow their citizens to carry guns have less violence, not more. it's the camel cowboys that are the problem.

Ignoramis(381) Disputed
1 point

Yep. Countries like Afganistan, Iraq, lots of countries in Africa (countries with armed citizens), etc ...

Countries without many armed citizens and strict gun laws (Canada, Sweden, Britian, St Kitts & Nevis (lots of black people there), etc ... These crimes have much less mass shootings and much less crime.

KayneOfNod(317) Disputed
1 point

9/11 used planes.

the boston marathon used bombs,

tokyo terrorists used neurotoxins (it was 1995, so it was within my lifetime :P)

Anthrax mail.

I think your argument is invalid :P

Ignoramis(381) Disputed
1 point

The kills take a lot more brain power and planning. Those attacks aren't something some random guy off the street can pull off.