CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:28
Arguments:27
Total Votes:31
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 A person on this site compared fat children to abuse, but killing viable children is ok! (23)

Debate Creator

FromWithin(8241) pic



A person on this site compared fat children to abuse, but killing viable children is ok!

You simply can not make this stuff up. These Progressives, Liberals, Leftwing hypocrites, whatever you want to call them are either dsyfunctionally brain impaired, or purely self consumed evil.

We see their hypocrisy with every debate they create. Their priorities are fixated on things such as parents who allow their kids to eat too much, or the food industry trying to sell products which might cause people to gain wait over their lifetimes, and maybe only live to 70 instead of 80 years of age.

But when it comes to their Leftwing political parties (Democrat, Green Party, etc. etc.), they say NOTHING against the politicians they elect, who are in bed with the abortion trade and Feminist groups, all because of the money given from these groups.

So do you see where their priorities lie? Killing viable special needs babies for merely being diverse, before even given a chance to enjoy life, before maybe competing in the Special Olympics, etc., is ok, but maybe feeding your child too much, or selling food products that might make you overweight and die 70 years down the road, is BAD BAD BAD!

Three words.............................HYPOCRITICAL INHUMAN FOOLS!

These Liberals are so passionate about issues of political correctness, but when it comes to truly important issues, such as premeditated support of killing innocent vialbe babies for any reason up to birth, is not important enough to ever mention.

You will NEVER read a debate from any of them concerning this true inhumanity to our most innocent viable children.
Add New Argument
2 points

Well, let's just address the title first since that starts the whole debate.

You say "A person on this site compared fat children to abuse, but killing viable children is ok!"

The debate was "Is it child abuse or neglect to overfeed a child to the point of obesity?"

Do you honestly not see what the difference is? A yes or no answer is fine.

Antrim(1287) Clarified
1 point

Thanks for the clarification there Mint.

I assumed there had been another debate which I had missed. Fromwithin, may I respectfully suggest you 'look before you leap'.

Mint_tea(4641) Clarified
1 point

No worries, glad to be of service.

FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

I looked and stand by my entire debate!.....................................

FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

The title of that debate is pointing out the possible harm to children from over eating, either by neglect or abuse.

This speaks exacty to my entire debate where soo called compassionate Liberals care about ur children, while at the same time supporting the killing our children.

My debate is speaking to the total hypocritical so called caring for our children when it comes to their getting overwieght from abuse, or neglect, or whatever, but these phonies could not care less if our viable children are being killed.

Which is worse? Enjoying life by eating anything you want, and then maybe dying a few years earlier, or being killed when you are just starting life.

If you can't grasp what this debate is all about, then WOW!

Antrim(1287) Clarified
1 point

Okay, I think your approach could have been a little clearer but I can see now what you were getting at.

No offence intended, I thought you had 'jumped the gun' as we all do on occasions.

Mint_tea(4641) Disputed
1 point

It was quite clear, not only from my comments but someone else's, that you were absolutely not clear in this debate.

Enjoying life by eating anything you want, and then maybe dying a few years earlier, or being killed when you are just starting life.

The point of the debate you referenced is not children enjoying life by eating anything they want, it's about the responsibility of the parent to guide their child and the potential for abuse by the parent to the child for neglecting them and their health. Do you not agree with that premise or are you only concerned about the child in the womb? It seems to me that if you are going to be bringing up concern for the unborn over the decisions of the mother, you could do it while agreeing that there needs to be care after birth. Most people who argue for abortion are really mainly ok with it only during the first trimester, I doubt many of them are ok with killing one for a "just because" reason. How would you go about forcing a woman to give birth?

-1 points

..............................................................................