CreateDebate


Debate Info

2
6
Can't he'd need the cops The military, but not Fascism
Debate Score:8
Arguments:5
Total Votes:8
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Can't he'd need the cops (1)
 
 The military, but not Fascism (3)

Debate Creator

BigTrain(106) pic



A space for Excon to tell us his plan to disarm minorities and 33,000 minority gangs

Can't he'd need the cops

Side Score: 2
VS.

The military, but not Fascism

Side Score: 6
2 points

If he doesn't give us his plan, he has no plan, and he has lost the gun debate.

Side: Can't he'd need the cops
excon(18261) Clarified
1 point

Lunch. I’ll be back …………………………………………. In Mexico lunch is a very leisurely affair.

Side: Can't he'd need the cops
BigTrain(106) Disputed
3 points

The interpretation of this is, you have no response just like the other 500 times, and you need to see if some leftist has an answer on Google.

Side: The military, but not Fascism
PinkGremlin(59) Disputed
2 points

Must have been one heck of a long lunch.

Side: The military, but not Fascism
1 point

Have specialist undercover agents Infiltrate these gangs similtaniously with the purpose of creating inter gang warfare and orchestrating the progressive escalation of deadly violence between them.

Once they have been sufficiently weakened squads of Navy Seals and/or Delta Forces could move in and mop up.

Right now all we have is mobs of virtue signallers bellowing their sanctimonious, meaningles drivel.

America does not have anyone or any group capable of formulating a stratgetic plan or the political courage to tackle these millstones around the nation's neck.

SUCH IS PRESENT DAY AMERICA

Side: The military, but not Fascism