A space for Excon to tell us the most interesting things in Hunter's emails
List them one through ten
Side Score: 1
|
![]() |
3 or 4 things
Side Score: 3
|
|
|
A space for Excon to tell us the most interesting things in Hunter's emails Hello L: Thank you for that.. I have NO idea what any of the emails on Hunter's laptop says. I haven't read them. But, given that the Russians or the Chinese MIGHT have tinkered with it, I wouldn't believe anything I read anyway... You shouldn't either.. The laptop was gathering dust in a repair shop. When the owner of the shop realized it was Biden's, he called Rudy Giuliani, and Giuliani turned it over to the FBI. Now, maybe nothing untoward happened to the laptop before the FBI got it, or maybe something DID. We just don't know, because it was never subjected to a "chain of custody".. Had it been, we'd KNOW, absolutely, that the stuff on it can be relied upon. But, it wasn't, so we can't The chain of custody is the most critical process of evidence documentation. It assures the authenticity of the evidence, and that it was, at all times in the custody of a person, who is designated to handle it. That wasn't the situation with the laptop.. We don't know who fiddled with it, if anybody.. Is that tidbit going to affect what you already believe?? Nahh, it isn't. In fact, you'll SOOO disbelieve it, instead of thanking me for clearing it up, you'll call me names.. Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha excon Side: List them one through ten
1
point
I have NO idea what any of the emails on Hunter's laptop says. I haven't read them. No surprise here. But, given that the Russians or the Chinese MIGHT have tinkered with it, I wouldn't believe anything I read anyway... You shouldn't either.. Yet you carried on for years about a Russian dossier that was proven to be fake. Side: 3 or 4 things
1
point
The laptop was gathering dust in a repair shop. When the owner of the shop realized it was Biden's, he called Rudy Giuliani, and Giuliani turned it over to the FBI. Now, maybe nothing untoward happened to the laptop before the FBI got it, or maybe something DID You do understand that they can 100% prove these are his emails and that he sent and received them? There are provably authentic communications that can be verified through cryptographic signatures. These signatures are a way for the company that handles the email to provide proof that the message came from a verified account and has not been altered in some way. Alterations made to an email after it has been sent cause the cryptographic signatures to become unverifiable. These were verifiable. The chain of custody is the most critical process of evidence documentation. It assures the authenticity of the evidence, and that it was, at all times in the custody of a person, who is designated to handle it. That wasn't the situation with the laptop.. We don't know who fiddled with it, if anybody.. Even left wing media makes none of these claims because none of it makes sense or shows that you have any idea how electronics actually work. That's why they have come out and said it's authentic. You can prove whether it's been tampered with. You can prove exactly where it came from. You can prove it all came from or was received by Hunter Biden's email. You can prove the email belongs to him. Side: 3 or 4 things
1
point
If it's "foreign disinformation", why is Hunter Biden going after those who made "his information" public and has never once denied any of it? And why aren't you showing the same concern that you would if he wasn't a Democrat? Side: 3 or 4 things
|
No arguments found. Add one!
|