CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:14
Arguments:18
Total Votes:14
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Against the idiots who ban opinions differing from theirs - with a reply to the Defence (14)

Debate Creator

JatinNagpal(2678) pic



Against the idiots who ban opinions differing from theirs - with a reply to the Defence

On defence - http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/In_the_defence_of_the_idiots_losers_who_ban_any_opinions_different_from_theirs


With this, I hope you'll stop complaining against the cowards that thoughtlessly ban you from debates. 

Flawed and incomplete. They're not merely idiots or cowards - they're spammers who ought to be removed. 

I'm presupposing that you understand what debates are. 

The nature of debates not being directly against them does not dictate any sympathy. 

As you might be aware, some idiots are being attacked on this site for being cowards as well, which I believe isn't fair. 

Again, flawed and incomplete. Their cowardice is a reason, but it must not be substituted as all there is. 

They're afraid of being wrong, even after all that. Therefore, they must ban any conflicting opinions if they can. It also saves your time from being wasted, and you'll be sure that they can't bear having their opinions debated. 

Yet they waste everyone's time by spamming the website. 

A debate website is probably the best place for them to stroke their ignorant ego. 

Doesn't lead to that everyone should bear with their spam. They're using the site's traffic for their own personal, idiotic and twisted purposes. They should rather create some little blogs in the corners of Internet where their opinions would be more welcome to die out. We have a Websites section in profiles, and this site is not for stroking their ignorant egos. 

They're merely spammers on this website. And, if as they claim, they're sent by a deity, then they're spam on this planet. 

Another way might be to regard it as propaganda rather than spam, or something in between. You might want to, but considering their intellectual capabilities, I'd find a pigeon to be more persuasive. 
Add New Argument

Does the font size and everything appear fine to you?

Because something seems strange to me. We don't have font controls in the debate editor, though.

Anyone can ask me if they need blogging service recommendations - try Wordpress.com. It's the most famous one. Or Tumblr, many like that too.

1 point

Let me clarify, you originally provided an argument defending them, but now you are creating a counter-debate on your original defense of their actions?

I think your font is fine, the layout if fairly clear, I just want to clarify your intent. :D

Yes, my views changed in these 40 days.

I've still criticised the defence, and that itself had received no questions.

But I don't see any reason to follow with what is so flawed in design.

1 point

Ah, thank you for the clarification. In terms of people responding to their ban with derision or amusement against the person who uses the ban button so liberally, it's an outlet. Sometimes it's enjoyable, sometimes it's nice to have other people going "yup, me too, they are such idiots"..... But yeah. I think I went off on a different topic, anyhoo, thanks again for the clarification.

1 point

Can you unban me from this debate, also can you please cite your sources :)

1 point

What are you saying?

I rarely use the ban button. And this is a simple argument, not based on statistics.

t-roy(362) Clarified
1 point

Oh sorry i thought this was Walmart I'll try harder next time, hope were sill friends, friend :)

1 point

The Little SnowFlake Cuaroc is one of those that ban because of differing views ! Cuaroc needs a safe space to protect it's self from those that are seemingly offensive ! A Big Box of Crayons and plenty of puppies probably keep Cuaroc in it's Safe Space !

JatinNagpal(2678) Clarified
1 point

Well, considering that he creates almost no debates by himself, I wouldn't accuse him of banning those with differing views.