CreateDebate


Debate Info

6
8
yes it is no it isn't
Debate Score:14
Arguments:13
Total Votes:16
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 yes it is (5)
 
 no it isn't (8)

Debate Creator

Vermink(1944) pic



Animals being killed for over-population is a stupid reason,

since no animal is as over-populated as the human race.

yes it is

Side Score: 6
VS.

no it isn't

Side Score: 8

It's stupid that we are trying to control Nature. It did fine on it's own till we fucked everything up.

Side: yes it is
Intangible(4934) Disputed
1 point

We're not trying to control nature.

We are just cutting down on shit so it doesn't effect our lives. Nature is in the way.

Side: no it isn't
1 point

first of all - *affect

And that is a stupid thing to say, honestly. You make it sound like we own this world, like we own everything. The animals have just as much right to be here as human beings have - no animal would kill us because we ''affect'' their lives, would they? So why should we?

Side: yes it is
1 point

Don't get me wrong, I'm an animal lover, but if you hit a 300 pound deer going 70 mph... it'll ruin your day. And many animals will suffer worse fates if their population isn't thinned out... like starvation.

Side: no it isn't
1 point

Stability is the main issue when eliminating animals, most groups of animals become to big to sustain themselves in a defined area and the population collapses. Not so with Humans

Side: no it isn't
Vermink(1944) Disputed
1 point

What you don't think the human race is becoming so big it's not becoming unsustainable? The reason that animals have such a defined habitat is because we've become so overpopulated that we've taken over their habitat. It's like someone going into you house then kicking you out claiming it as there own.

Side: yes it is
xBetzy(123) Disputed
1 point

What you don't think the human race is becoming so big it's not becoming unsustainable?

Well in terms of energy sources, we are unsustainable, however with food we are sustainable, there is enough food to feed everyone in the world a decent amount, however due to unequal distribution of food many parts of the world have chronic issues with undernourishment and malnutrition. But if companies were to make sizable donations in growing local businesses for food production in said countries the world would be much better off.

That is where animals and humans differ our brains allow us to problem solve with current materials and think into the future a measurable amount. Deer however dire their situation will continue breeding until all the available roughage is depleted and the population collapses.

Side: no it isn't

"We don't need wild animals roaming through the cities and possibly hurting a civilian!"

Now from the animals Perspective.

"These humans are coming into our environment and killing most of our inhabitants!"

Territory Wars. Survival of the Fittest Baby.

People Rule! D:<

Side: no it isn't
1 point

I'm pretty sure you are looking at this the wrong way.

Killing animals for over-population is a scientifically sound idea.

The bit is, we need to exercise this practice on the human population.

Side: no it isn't