CreateDebate


Debate Info

4
4
Sure as hell would Shut that guy up!
Debate Score:8
Arguments:5
Total Votes:9
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Sure as hell would (2)
 
 Shut that guy up! (3)

Debate Creator

YawnOfSnooze(39) pic



Any libs care to discuss Goldman Sachs, seeing you are whining about them?

While Goldman Sachs was in the middle of laying off 1,700 workers in 2013, it decided to spend more than two-thirds of a million dollars on Hillary Clinton. And what did it get for its sizable investment? Very expensive pabulum.

On Saturday, WikiLeaks released the complete transcripts of Clinton's three appearances at Goldman Sachs events in the span of five months in 2013. These are the transcripts that Clinton adamantly refused to release during the primaries, when Bernie Sanders was calling for them to be made public.

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/goldman-sachs-paid-hillary-675000-for-this/

---

Under the Obama Administration, in 2009 alone, Goldman Sachs took more than $20 billion in taxpayer cash through bailouts, payments and backstops; and then turned around and paid out $16.2 B as 2009 bonuses, plus an additional $5 B more in bonuses in 2010 [Without Obama Administration’s “help” Goldman’s bonuses would have been zip, zero, ziltch.]

Sure as hell would

Side Score: 4
VS.

Shut that guy up!

Side Score: 4
1 point

I was the one "whining" about Goldman Sachs, and I am neither a Liberal nor a supporter of Hillary Clinton. Just an FYI: when someone points out that your president hired six senior Goldman Sachs executives to run the economy after spending months insisting he would "drain the swamp", the correct answer is not to attack either Hillary Clinton or Liberals. Capiche?

Side: Sure as hell would
2 points

when someone points out that your president hired six senior Goldman Sachs executives to run the economy after spending months insisting he would "drain the swamp", the correct answer is not to attack either Hillary Clinton or Liberals. Capiche?

Indeed. This only proves that both liberals and conservatives are loyal to capitalism above all. Capitalism keeps people locked in the cycle of hatred, while keeping others safe from the pain that allows you to understand the pain of others. The cycle can never be broken as long as capitalism exists

Side: Sure as hell would
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

NOM it is why to easy to destroy those of you who apparently cannot use Al Gore's Amazing Internet !

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/goldman-sachs-paid-hillary-675000-for-this/

While Goldman Sachs was in the middle of laying off 1,700 workers in 2013, it decided to spend more than two-thirds of a million dollars on Hillary Clinton. And what did it get for its sizable investment? Very expensive pabulum.

https://money.cnn.com/2016/04/20/news/economy/hillary-clinton-goldman-sachs/index.html

Just two months after leaving the State Department, Hillary Clinton began a short but very lucrative speaking career to banks, securities firms, trade associations, and three times, Goldman Sachs.

In October 2013, Hillary Clinton was paid $225,000 to speak at Goldman Sachs "Builders and Innovators" conference, held at the Ritz Carlton Dove Mountain Resort in Marana, Arizona.

NOM you are not very bright but you are very stupid and by design !!!!

Side: Shut that guy up!
Bronto(2002) Disputed
1 point

I was the one "whining" about Goldman Sachs, and I am neither a Liberal nor a supporter of Hillary Clinton.

Bzzzzzt...

Try again Sammy.

Come now Nom. What yarn will you be spinning for us next? Perhaps the "I don't live with Mommy" yarn?

Or will it be the "I'm not suckling Mommy's teet like a pack of hungry baby piglets" yarn?

Side: Shut that guy up!
2 points

And trump appointed at least 2 goldman sachs executive alumni to his cabinet. Whats your point?

Both parties are bought and paid for and corrupt. Democrats do not stand against money in politics. Liberals do. theres a big difference

Side: Shut that guy up!