CreateDebate


Debate Info

19
7
Yes No
Debate Score:26
Arguments:20
Total Votes:27
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (12)
 
 No (5)

Debate Creator

Micmacmoc(2260) pic



Are Man-Made Things Natural?

Yes

Side Score: 19
VS.

No

Side Score: 7
4 points

Well, if it's as simple as the definition provided by Mc overthere, I guess not.

However, if we were to look at it logically, a man-made object is as natural as an anthill.

I suppose the definition seems to put man above nature. How arrogant, really.

Side: Yes
1 point

"How arrogant, really"

I think that arrogance is found in varying degrees all across human nature and there is little way that such a thing can be changed. Arrogance (overbearing pride evidenced by a superior manner toward inferiors) is something that almost all of us possess. If I am British and proud of it, then I may display a small amount of unintentional arrogance to other countries - mostly without meaning to; it is human nature. The same applies if I play for a football team, if I do well on a test, etc.

I think I can happily say that I am not the most arrogant of people, I can think of loads of people who are, but I do not consider myself to be one of them. This does not, of course, mean I am the kind of person who is ridiculously big-headed. I think it is human nature.

Therefore I think that placing yourself above other organisms to use the term man-made more efficiently is not a bad thing.

Side: No
ChadOnSunday(1863) Clarified
2 points

If I am British and proud of it, then I may display a small amount of unintentional arrogance to other countries - mostly without meaning to; it is human nature.

If I am British and proud of it, then I may display intentional arrogance to other countries - mostly without meaning to; it is human nature.

There, fixed.

Side: Yes
MuckaMcCaw(1970) Disputed
1 point

I suppose the definition seems to put man above nature. How arrogant, really.

Anthropocentric, perhaps. Humans tend to describe things by relation to the human experience.

Arrogant? Hardly. Its just the difference between "natural" and "artificial".

Side: No
3 points

I made a huge dump this morning, that was pretty natural-----

Side: Yes
2 points

O.e Now I fully understand why your name is "Randomdude."

Side: Yes

Yea I just say the first thing that comes to mind----------------

Side: Yes
1 point

All man made things are made from natural stuff.

Therefore it's natural.

Side: Yes

I was made by a human man and woman. I consider myself all natural. Your call ;)

Side: Yes

Yes. Warlin put it a good way; calling something man-made is simply a more accurate description of its origin. An anthill is ant-made, a beaver dam is beaver-made, a bridge is man-made, and so on, but in none of these cases is the thing being made unnatural. So all man-made things are natural but not all natural things are man-made.

On a side note, Warlin put it a good way on a debate almost just like this that I made not even a 3 days ago. A debate you participated in. I understand bringing up an old issue if the preexisting debate is long-dead or whatever, but why did you make a new debate to discuss the exact thing we were discussing on my debate a couple days ago?

http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/ Are_Nukes_Natural

Is it because you can't ban people on my debates?

Side: Yes
1 point

I would say that yes, most things man made are natural. Where I would find a grey area is when man creates something that doesn't naturally occur in the wild, i.e. certain atomic elements which either never occur naturally, or they don't ever stay I that state for more than a split second in a transition. But otherwise, I think man made is also natural.

Side: Yes

If they weren't natural, they wouldn't exist.

Nature made and designed us. Therefore everything we make and design was also within the design of nature to be made.

Side: Yes
1 point

Well, yes. Anything we make is all made out of atoms. These atoms have been whizzing around the universe for billions of years. Then, quite a few million years ago, they f0rmed our planet. Now we are using those atoms to create things. So yes.

Side: Yes

I will answer "Yes" because the ingredients come from Nature.

Side: Yes
2 points

According to the definition of the word, they are not.

The definition is:

Existing in or caused by nature; not made or caused by humankind

Man-made things are caused by humankind, and things that are not made by humankind are therefore natural.

Side: No
Emperor(1348) Disputed
2 points

Yes, but if humans are animals, then we certainly are also natural.

Like how an ant colony is natural, a city could be considered natural as well.

Side: Yes
Micmacmoc(2260) Disputed
1 point

Man-made things are things that are not natural. The definition I have found for this is:

not of natural origin; prepared or made artificially

I am not saying that humans are not natural; why would you try to say that? What I am saying is that things made by humans are not natural - they would not exist in nature.

Side: No