CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
I think the problem is that these glorified killers are being made into martyrs by rich extremists because the US is making media sensations about it. What is needed is a disruption to the social support group silently without anyone knowing about it. Criminals have support groups. You systematically take out people and make everyone think that they are still alive, and suddenly, you have one group searching for them, and the rest left confused and uncertain. You can let a few go periodically. Just cut a nerve or injure them to a point by accident, so that they will not be a threat in the future.
Like in the old days. Wars don't have to be public.
Kill the known bad people outside of the law, because the law doesn't solve problems, it delays them and protects bad people. Make it an accident. Law enforcement isn't good at solving murders. Bad people kill good people, why can't an exception be made for the alternative without anyone knowing?
CAIR supports terrorists, they are using propaganda soft selling Islam which spreads incrementally first by increasing numbers of "peaceful"Muslims, then bringing in Sharia law, inciting violence by claiming religious persecution when brutalities in their law (such as beatings and beheadings) conflict with established secular laws, and then the jihadists start their murders for Allah. The goal of Islam is geopolitical, it's world domination by force. Only seven percent of Germans were Nazis when Hitler rose to power, jihadists take power over Muslim countries by a similar and even lower percentage of active radicals.
CAIR supports Islamic terrorist organizations. They are a propaganda tool. Their goal is domination, to bring in Sharia law, making all of the world Muslim. If you want to support CAIR, why don't you just go bow to Allah and say Mohammed is his prophet and become a real Muslim instead of sucking off of them to promote your own stupid entertainments.
The video is being used by CAIR, a terror supporting organization, as propaganda. The first step is to appeal for acceptance of Muslims as humans, the second step is to inflame Muslims by crying religious persecution every time their beliefs are denounced or every time peaceful Muslims are accused of guilt by association for upholding the Koran which says over 100 times to kill Christians and Jews. CAIR is a propaganda tool which attempts to increase the number of radical Islam jihadists. They are not a friend of moderate Muslims, they are evil and the people in the videos are either willing and knowing participants or they are stupid regarding CAIR. Which are you?
I think you are an idiot for promoting CAIR propaganda, or you are a Muslim, or both. CAIR is an Islamic organization which supports jihadist Muslim groups, terrorists. You are either a Muslim or an idiot for promoting CAIR
All Muslims, Christians and Jews worship a God who supposedly killed everybody on the planet except one family (in a flood that left no evidence) - to each their own I guess...
It says that all followers (and creators) of religions are flawed - especially when compared to today's standards (the first age of consent law to require an age above 12 was in the 1860s AD - ref)
It should also be pointed out, any male living to the age of 35 was considered old. The average life expectancy was about 25'ish and the infant mortality rate was WAY above what it is now. Back in the years of Mohammad it was very common to have a wife once the girl began her menstrual cycle and to begin trying to procreate at that age. Who knows, in another thousand years if our average life expectancy is 150, that culture will look back at ours and think having sex and dating at 20 would make us a pedophiles.
It should also be pointed out, any male living to the age of 35 was considered old.
Well, no, infant mortality skewed life expectancy. High infant mortality pulled down the average, but that doesn't mean there weren't elderly. If you survived past age 5, you could expect to live to age 63.
So what? A nine-year old girl (age of Mohammed's first wife) is nowhere near puberty. Especially back then. Girls tend to reach puberty earlier now (first menstrual cycle) than ever before in history. The reasons for this are debated in medical and biological circles. (I personally favor the growth-hormones-in-our-meat theory).
But even nowadays, a girl reaching puberty at 11 is rare. Back then during Mo's time nine was still a few years out.
So why are you defending a murderous, psychotic, deluded, war-mongering pedophile? Just curious. Especially you being a woman and all. I say this because women are usually the gender whining the loudest about older men and young girls getting it on. Women were of course the prime demographic in getting our country's age of consent upped to 17 or 18, depending on the state.
Why? While the women would tell you that its to protect the young girls, many of us know different. Listen.......we all know--especially women--that a 14 year old or 15 year old girl today is perfectly ripe for sex. Physically and mentally and emotionally. She is well aware of all possible repercussions.
But the middle age women of this country don't need the competition for male affections. Especially when said compo is so hot and nubile and energetic thus cannot compete.
So how do you prevail over a competitor which you cannot hope to compete with?
Simple: you take them off the board.
Viola! Age of consent pushed as high as they can get it. And draconian punishment for any male who dares have consensual sex with a 15 year-old. Really? Twenty years for consensual sex with an underage girl? that's freaking medieval.
Puberty by and large still occurs between the ages of 12 and 14. Some 80% of girls over the past four decades have fallen into that category.
Your 5 year-old example is a very very very rare aberration, and really does not contradict my OP in the least. I could say that there was a baby born yesterday who weighed nine ounces. this does not change the fact that in America today the average full-term delivery baby weighs about 7.6 lbs.
Medieval? I was referring to punishments, and the severity thereof, and the medieval times were known for this. I was not referring to medieval age of consent. (there was none back then, by the way; the term was not even heard of. So you're wrong again on THAT with your 10-12 thing.)
God has the right to kill everybody, including you, and any moment. And Muslims do not worship God, they worship Allah which is a false god, a god of murder. Islam is nothing but murder towards Jews and Christians and gains political domination of countries by force, threats of violence, murder, intimidation. Catholicism is not Biblical Christianity, Christianity spreads by persuasion, not intimidation.....and again, Catholicism is not Christianity but rather an attempt to hijack Christianity for statehood purposes. The Crusades were war acts carried out by Catholics sanctioned by their government to stop Islam from conquering Europe and it's a good thing they did...and now the fools are allowing Islam to attempt to conquer Europe through immigration.
The truth is simple, common sense is plain, and you should be ignored as your name requests because you are ignorant.
Then we shouldn't treat all Muslims as if they are.
"But All Terrorist Are Muslim"
Baloney.
Wade Michael Page, James Holmes, Adam Lanza, Jared Loughner, Dylan Roof, Seung-Hui Cho, Eric Harris, Dylan Klebold, Joseph Stack, Ted Kaczynski, Eric Rudolph, Timothy McVeigh, Terry Nichols, the KKK, etc., etc., etc.
You dispute all Terrorist are not Muslims ? You must have missed Paris , Brussels, Bangladesh , San Bernadino , Fort Hood , Boston and Orlando ! Not surprising you Progressives would miss that !
you must have missed Wade Michael Page, James Holmes, Adam Lanza, Jared Loughner, Dylan Roof, Seung-Hui Cho, Eric Harris, Dylan Klebold, Joseph Stack, Ted Kaczynski, Eric Rudolph, Timothy McVeigh, Terry Nichols, the KKK, etc., etc., etc.
You dispute all Terrorist are not Muslims ? You must have missed Paris , Brussels, Bangladesh , San Bernadino , Fort Hood , Boston and Orlando ! Not surprising you Progressives would miss that !Islamic Terrorist committed the above crimes did they not ?
You dispute all Terrorist are not Muslims ? You must have missed Paris , Brussels, Bangladesh , San Bernadino , Fort Hood , Boston and Orlando ! Not surprising you Progressives would miss that !Islamic Terrorist committed the above crimes did they not ?
You dispute all Terrorist are not Muslims ? You must have missed Paris , Brussels, Bangladesh , San Bernadino , Fort Hood , Boston and Orlando ! Not surprising you Progressives would miss that !Islamic Terrorist committed the above crimes did they not ?
If you can't accept the TRUTH then who is STUPID ?
I am not saying I hate or love Muslims, but thoughs videos talk about certain Muslims not the ones (aomw of the ones ) in the middle east blowning stiff up. So not all terrorist nor hero's.
