Are guns more dangerous than LSD? Why is one legal and the other not?
Should the government protect us against ourselves???
excon
YES - and I have NO clue
Side Score: 1
|
 |
No - abuse LSD and you go NUTS
Side Score: 1
|
|
|
|
|
You are comparing bananas with airplanes. Both of them belong to different categories even when you use the law of the land to make your argument. To be more clear, you are comparing the traffic law of 25 miles limit with getting a divorce. Anyway, a gun must be legal to use but in many States there are restrictions and/or limitations of their use. With the drug, such is a different scenario, it's prohibited. Drugs will cause harm to your body and mind, this is in health status only, while gun's impact in a body cause an injury, which is something different. Drugs can also lead for you to cause injuries to yourself of course. You can drive a car carrying a gun, but you can't drive a car after LSD consumption. You carry a gun and you can control yourself, on the other hand you consume LSD and who knows what you will do next and if you will be aware of it. Then, drugs can be indeed more dangerous than carrying a gun in several occasions. Side: YES - and I have NO clue
|
1
point
Are guns more dangerous than LSD? No telling. It's more likely you get struck by lightning than killed by a gun, so I assume you're wearing your lightning suit just in case. Do it for Grandma Con... Why is one legal and the other not? The god government said so, eh Con? Side: No - abuse LSD and you go NUTS
|
