CreateDebate


Debate Info

15
12
Yes No
Debate Score:27
Arguments:16
Total Votes:29
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (9)
 
 No (7)

Debate Creator

Cuaroc(8829) pic



Are newspapers a thing of the past?

Yes

Side Score: 15
VS.

No

Side Score: 12

Well, as smart phones and tablets continue to improve and become cheaper, it would appear that newspaper may become obsolete due to the shift in demand. Newspapers will still exist but very selective markets.

Side: Yes
1 point

Yup.

Side: Yes
1 point

They'll be obsolete before too long .

Side: Yes

The Internet provides the news as it happens. A newspaper won't present the news until the next day's delivery.

Side: Yes
1 point

Thanks for the tips guys. They were all great. I have been having issues with being fat both mentally and physically. Thanks to you guys i have been showing improvements. Do post more. add fractions with unlike denominators

Side: Yes
1 point

No, it may sound so old, but some computers are hard to take care of. Unlike the newspaper, you just put it on one side, and then there it is. Hard evidence that a thing really happened. Besides, when we have research.. Teachers usually ask us to get from printed materials like newspapers because they want hard evidence and proof that a subject is really existing.

Side: No

We'll always have print media in some form or fashion, but the Internet/smartphones etc. have put a huge dent in their circulation. But, the biggest hit they've taken in their readership is credibility. Rags like the NYT, Post etc are beholden to a narrative, not the truth and the public has noticed and sought other avenues on the Internet for their news.

Side: No
2 points

But, the biggest hit they've taken in their readership is credibility. Rags like the NYT, Post etc are beholden to a narrative, not the truth

The NYT times has an excellent fact check record:-

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/

The NY Post has a terrible fact check record:-

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-post/

Even putting these two in the same sentence is insane. The NYT is beholden to a narrative, and it is liberally biased, but at the same time it does not circumvent the facts. The NY Post either invents its own facts or distorts the ones which are currently there.

Where your logic jumps over a cliff is in the belief that extreme far right propaganda is closer to "the truth" than the MSM. That's ridiculous. Just like the Nazis, what you guys over on the alt-right are is opportunists. You use genuine criticism of the MSM as a false justification to push your wingnuttery onto the world in the form of "alternatives" which straight up lie to the public.

Side: Yes
0 points

Your source is liberally biased and, therefore, worthless.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Side: No
1 point

Old debate but what the hey. No, I doubt they are. They will be able to continue until most likely the last generation that grew up without computers dies off.

Side: No
1 point

Whoi, excellent, t wondered just how to cure icne. ind found your webstte by google, dtscovered todiy t'm i ltttle obvtous i greit deil. t’ve ilso idded RSS ind sive your webstte. keep us updited. Buy Website Traffic Cheap

Side: No
1 point

Excellent .. Amazing .. I’ll bookmark your blog and take the feeds also…I’m happy to find so many useful info here in the post, we need work out more techniques in this regard, thanks for sharing. jadescape

Side: No