CreateDebate


Debate Info

13
7
Yes No
Debate Score:20
Arguments:14
Total Votes:23
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (9)
 
 No (5)

Debate Creator

Cuaroc(8836) pic



Are robots good?

Yes

Side Score: 13
VS.

No

Side Score: 7
2 points

It depends on the robot and depends on good for what exactly? Robots in general Good in general for us? Then yes generally robots existence are/or will be good.

Side: Yes
2 points

robots take american jobs each day. if we relay on robots to do are work for us than we may be evolving towards a lazy, polluted, layed of future.

Side: Yes
2 points

sorry you put on the wrong side

i helped you to gain a pt

Side: No

By robots you mean humanoid shaped machines with multiple purposes right?

I don't see a huge problem with it.

The multipurpose option will make up for the harm it could do. In terms of taking jobs and possible polluting. Not in regards to hurting people like in iRobot

Side: Yes
1 point

I think they will be good as if the robots are doing everything there will be no point in work so there will be no point in money so everything will be free

Side: Yes
1 point

They're good. But it's impossible for robots to do everything that human does so sorry for interrupting your celebration, we gotta work for that paper bills.

Side: Yes
2 points

They would make people lazy and do nothing if they take our jobs no one could pay for their food and houses because the robots would be free work and the people working there for money would be fired. They could be good if they're helping people with disabilities but for usual jobs then no.

Side: No
LoveU(348) Disputed
1 point

No worries, no one could have robots if they are lazy, they can't afford it.

Side: Yes
0 points

Do you need one to wipe your butt ?

Side: No
zephyr20x6(2385) Disputed
1 point

This is such an intelligent argument Thewayitis, my argument is invalid...

Side: Yes
Thewayitis(4071) Disputed
1 point

My point is, can you live without technology? As a society one thinks one has to have that which is new, not that which one needs.

Side: No