CreateDebate


Debate Info

3
4
Yes! No!
Debate Score:7
Arguments:5
Total Votes:9
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes! (2)
 
 No! (3)

Debate Creator

sayyad99(773) pic



Are the Democrats capable of fighting terrorism?

Do you think that Democrats are capable of fighting terrorism? If so, what are you reasons? Do you think that Democrats are even making an effort to help fight terrorism and to equip the national security departments with the access to budgets, equipment, human resources, etc?

Yes!

Side Score: 3
VS.

No!

Side Score: 4
2 points

Democrats are better at it because they don't trot around the globe invading the wrong countries ><

I find it hilarious that Republicans still try to be the tough on Terrorism Party. They did nothing to make us "safer" Bush's entire term. Republicans made us less safe with their cowboy diplomacy bs. No one likes a cowboy unless they're at the movies. Cowboys are annoying in real life.

Anyway, Clinton left Bush a memo, which Rice read and remembered entitled "Osama determined to attack America"

And what happened? Did the tough-on-terrorists Republicans stop Osama? Nope, worst terrorist attack in American history on the Republican's watch.

Side: Yes!

The Democrats don't like terrorism and they are diligent in their efforts to combat terrorism.

Side: Yes!
1 point

Man made disasters...... not terrorism .

Side: No!

From what I see with this current administration, I don't think so. But, this administration has only had two years to deal with the terrorists, so maybe in a couple of more years, this question will be easier to answer.

Side: No!

Democrats are incapable of comprehending how to get out of a wet paper bag.

Side: No!