Are there any topics that should be considered inapropriate for debate?
Definitely
Side Score: 10
|
Hell no
Side Score: 9
|
|
|
|
1
point
I'm sorry Pyggy but you are dead wrong here and extraordinarily insulting to boot. I'm a gay woman and detest NAMBLA, however, for you to state, unequivocally, that these are the only people who rape or have sex with children is an out and out lie. You don't want to attract NAMBLA members??? Well who does but who the hell are you? PC fags indeed. You've said some pretty harsh things in your arguments but I take the greatest exception to this type of comment. In fact, it is the STRAIGHT male who is the guiltiest in this department. What shall we call them now? How about simply HAMBLA! Now please, back up your statement. Side: Hell NO
NAMBLA is the only openly pedophilia organization that i know of. has really nothing to do with gayness or not. as for PC fags, fag is really just a netz term to generalize people. instead of saying "republicans" we say "republifags". but, i still forget that not everyone here knows about the internetz just yet, so i'm sorry i wasn't clear enough. Side: Definitely
Yes, please refer to this link in which I am basing my evidence upon. Side: Definitely
1
point
1
point
|
Freedom of speech is a defining mark of a civilised society, and to be meaningful it has to extend to everyone, whatever they want to say! If we restrict freedom of speech to people we disagree with, then speech is not really free. All in all every topic of debate should be able to be up for discussion Side: Hell NO
2
points
What you say is true Wolf but only one point must be made I think...and that would be that the debates be in good taste. The debate on the board the other day just blew my mind. JC had one up about "What's worse? To be called a dick, an a$$ or a pussy? And why not call someone a tit?" and a lesser one named "Why do they use letters in bra cup sizes? Findout here..." Good taste, Bad taste, No taste? I think that topics can be much broader here on line but I find those listed to be in rather bad taste. Side: Hell NO
No. Even if people decide to make crazy debates like "how to properly rape a child", then it gives decent people the opportunity to tell them why they are screwed up in the head. Everything is debatable. Without communication we don't solve anything. ESPECIALLY for the things we don't want to see or debate about. Side: Hell NO
It depends on the setting. Religion is definitely an inappropriate conversation topic between an atheist and Mutaween (religious police of Saudi Arabia) in a police station or jail there. No topic should be inappropriate but in the real world people try to stay mum on dicey topics and grey areas. Side: Hell NO
|