Are trees sentient?
|
1
point
You are using the Left's latest catch word to tell us when a viable unborn life can be protected. They say when the child is sentient. I guess sentient does not even protect a baby born alive from a botched abortion today! Remember when Feminists and Pro abortion Democrats told us that Life of mother was why we should legalize abortions, and most of us agreed. But that was not their true goals. From life of mother, it went to 1st Trimester convenience abortions, to brain wave activity, to feeling pain, to viability, but that was STILL not good enough. Today the Democrat Party can ot find an unborn baby that should be protected, so the newest buzz word is Sentient! Inhuman politicians selling their souls to radical Feminst and Pro abortion lobbies, and people still vote for them! You are using the Left's latest catch word to tell us when a viable unborn life can be protected. Hello From: Hold on podner... I'm talking about trees - not babies.. But, now that you brought it up, if I think a tree is sentient, I surly think a baby is sentient.. Nonetheless, I remain pro choice.. Being sentient or not, has NEVER been reason to force women to have babies they don't want. excon 1
point
If you knew God, and had the least amount of humanity, you would realize that a viable baby should be protected the same as any baby after birth. To say a woman should never be forced to protect a baby she does not want, is no different then saying a mother who no longer wants her 1 year old baby should have the right to kill it. Do you ever actually sit down, look in the mirror, and think about the lunacy of your excuses for killing living growing human beings? TRY IT! |
