CreateDebate


Debate Info

11
7
It does It does a lot
Debate Score:18
Arguments:12
Total Votes:18
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 It does (7)
 
 It does a lot (4)

Debate Creator

brontoraptor(28599) pic



Atheism acts like a mental disorder

Ask an atheist how we got here, they don't know. Point out to them that something can never come from nothing, they'll agree or give you some tortured definition of "nothing" as opposed to the definition in the dictionary: "Not a thing"

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nothing

Ask an atheist about the infinite regress of causality and their only response is "well where did God come from"? Never ever grasping that they MUST have a naturalistic answer of which "something from nothing" and "the infinite regress of causes" are not naturalistic answers. Those are answers that mean you must believe in magic or voodoo or the like. "Where did God come from"? is a nonsensical question because if God created time and "having a beginning" and is abstract or unknowable as to "how" to the naturalist, the Theist still has an answer, while the atheist has no answer and no logic. Where does God come from? With an answer from beyond our reality we can answer theoretically. Examples? There is no "where" to God. He created "where". There is no "when" to God. He created "When". Time, space, beginnings, endings, etc, are all illusionary abstract creations by God, etc. Time is subjective and tenseless to God; he can move through it like a library as his own abstract creation from his tense which just "is". Still yet, the Atheist has not even a theory about "how" or "when", even though naturalism demands it. Atheism is actually a "non-intellectual" position.




It does

Side Score: 11
VS.

It does a lot

Side Score: 7
3 points

I mean, so does the constant pathological desire to spread one's views by creating a hundred new debates every day with the same topics and buzzwords, and not replying to opposing points. It doesn't mean it's a mental disorder.

Onto the actual topic, I did respond to you when you posted this in a debate earlier -- as I have done the last few times you've taken a debate argument into a new debate -- but like the other times, I'm still awaiting a reply.

Side: It does
2 points

Ask an atheist how we got here, they don't know.

Perhaps the answer is the same as "How did God come about". We/He just did.

Let's face it, neither side has all of the answers so parading around and puffing our chest out like we do is almost the ultimate lie. The difference in power is whichever side is the most convincing.

Side: It does
2 points

Sorry, but when someone tells you they don't know the answer to something and you start arguing with them over an answer they didn't give, that's more like a mental disorder.

Side: It does
3 points

Ask an atheist how we got here, they don't know.

But you don't know either. The difference is that they are honest enough to admit it, whereas you guys invented a fantasy about an all powerful bearded wizard.

Side: It does a lot
1 point

But you don't know either.

Perhaps, but I have a lot more to back my position than you do.

https://www.facebook.com/The-Beast-is-Strong-in-This-One-273041423117102/

You have NO answer. I have an answer. I have a first cause. Naturalism defies the concept of "first cause".

Side: It does
Quantumhead(749) Disputed
1 point

Perhaps, but I have a lot more to back my position than you do

(links Facebook and expects you to take him seriously)

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Side: It does a lot
1 point

The difference is that they are honest enough to admit it

Not really. Most Atheists are pretty arrogant on their position, as was exampled by your last sentence.

Side: It does
Quantumhead(749) Disputed
2 points

Not really.

You are now contradicting your own opening post, in which you claimed: "Ask an atheist how we got here, they don't know."

Side: It does a lot
1 point

you guys invented a fantasy about an all powerful bearded wizard.

Hmmm... nope. Jesus is a historical figure even according to Atheist historians. I have no idea if he has a beard, and he isn't a wizard. Something coming from nothing is magic in its deepest, darkest form.

Side: It does
Quantumhead(749) Disputed
1 point

Hmmm... nope. Jesus is a historical figure even according to Atheist historians.

Bullshit. Literally everything you write is complete bullshit.

Did historical Jesus really exist? The evidence just doesn’t add up.

There are clearly good reasons to doubt Jesus’ historical existence.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/12/18/did-historical-jesus-exist-the-traditional-evidence-doesnt-hold-up/?utm_term=.e13ec4135af8

Side: It does a lot
outlaw60(15368) Clarified
1 point

"Their logic has become outright religious on the issue of 9/11. The evidence is extraordinarily clear that there was a cover up, but they simply point blank refuse to acknowledge or entertain the idea. We have had a 16 year narrative of Islamic terrorism justifying horrible acts of American aggression which is thoroughly and entirely rooted in the lie that 9/11 was the responsibility of al Qaeda."

Hey dummy why are you defending religion then ? LeatherHead you are just another Spun Out Leftist and you show you are by your own words.

Side: It does