CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:6
Arguments:6
Total Votes:6
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
  (6)

Debate Creator

brontoraptor(28599) pic



Atheist molecular biologist destroys Darwinian Theory?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6ElA0--JNg&t=69s

Darwinian Theory uses Adhoc Constraints to come to its conclusions, which is? Bad science, well... horrible science. It does not even meet the bare minimum of the scientific method. Is Darwinian Theory true? Maybe, maybe not. Is it provable or shown by significant and convincing evidence? Nope.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hoc
Add New Argument
1 point

Before I clicked on here I said: "Oh, NO! Another Brontoraptor anti- Atheist, alt-right "fact study!" It's beginning to get to where one can smell them coming! He certainly is committed to unbelievable, fictitious make believe! Wouldn't it be great to be able to just say ... "He certainly is committed."

1 point

Ad hominem. So which part are you going to argue with an Atheist biologist about? You must be anti-science?

1 point

Hello bront:

Evolution isn't true, huh?? So, then I guess you believe the church's version of creation... But, I SWEAR you said church is NOT a good place to learn your science, and here you go believing that very thing..

Dude!

excon

LichPotato(362) Disputed
1 point

Presenting Darwinian Evolution and "the Church's version of creation" as the only two options is ludicrous. To begin with, there is no single universally agreed-upon worldview between Creationists (the schism between taking Genesis literally and viewing it as an allegory come to mind), and even if there were, we're talking about the people themselves, not some monolithic organization (as you seem to imply).

1 point

Church isn't a good place to learn science, and the liberal, atheist church fits into that category. Explain to us the Cambrian explosion and why there aren't billions of intermediaries in the fossil record to get us from simple to human, and if you can't provide us a reasonable response, we actually, logically should oppose the theory because it makes no logical sense in comparison to the actual evidence.